The influence of lateral load patterns on the seismic design of zipper braced frames

Concentrically braced frames are prone to excessive interstorey drift concentrated within a single floor, have a limited ability to redistribute damage across the structure height and experience lateral strength degradation after braces have buckled. To overcome these drawbacks, an innovative system labeled zipper braced frames with elastic zipper columns (E-ZBFs) is analyzed and a method for zipper column design is proposed based on the use of invariant load patterns. Thus, the purpose of this study is twofold: (i) to validate the suitable static method for zipper column design through nonlinear time-history analyses and; (ii) to investigate the inelastic behavior of the 4-, 8- and 12-storey E-ZBF buildings located in a high risk seismic zone (Victoria, BC) under crustal, subduction, and near-field ground motion ensembles. Accordingly, the potential performance of E-ZBF buildings subjected to a giant Cascadia subduction earthquake was investigated. It was found that the long-period shaking from the megathrust Tohoku earthquake (2011) may cause severe structural damage in the 12-storey building and even collapse. In addition, findings of the present study are significant for the development of displacement loading protocols.

[1]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Conditional Mean Spectrum: Tool for Ground-Motion Selection , 2011 .

[2]  Brad Shaback,et al.  Behaviour of square hollow structural steel braces with end connections under reversed cyclic axial loading , 2003 .

[3]  G. Atkinson.  Earthquake time histories compatible with the 2005 National building code of Canada uniform hazard spectrum , 2009 .

[4]  Alexander Remennikov,et al.  Seismic Behavior and Deterministic Design Procedures for Steel V-Braced Frames , 1998 .

[5]  S. Kunnath,et al.  Relevance of Absolute and Relative Energy Content in Seismic Evaluation of Structures , 2008 .

[6]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Inelastic seismic response of steel bracing members , 2002 .

[7]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Modal-Pushover-Based Ground-Motion Scaling Procedure , 2011 .

[8]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Predicted Ground Motions for Great Interface Earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zone , 2009 .

[9]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Adaptive Modal Combination Procedure for Nonlinear Static Analysis of Building Structures , 2006 .

[10]  Anastasios Sextos,et al.  Selection of earthquake ground motion records: A state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective , 2010 .

[11]  Liang Chen,et al.  Innovative Bracing System for Earthquake Resistant Concentrically Braced Frame Structures , 2011 .

[12]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF CONCENTRICALLY BRACED STEEL FRAMES MADE WITH RECTANGULAR HOLLOW BRACING MEMBERS , 2003 .

[13]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Practical guidelines to select and scale earthquake records for nonlinear response history analysis of structures , 2010 .

[14]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Effective Cyclic Energy as a Measure of Seismic Demand , 2007 .

[15]  Julian J. Bommer,et al.  Selection and Scaling of Real Accelerograms for Bi-Directional Loading: A Review of Current Practice and Code Provisions , 2007 .

[16]  Gail M. Atkinson,et al.  Development of seismic hazard maps for the proposed 2005 edition of the National Building Code of Canada , 2003 .

[17]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Pushover Response of a Braced Frame with Suspended Zipper Struts , 2008 .

[18]  Erol Kalkan,et al.  Required number of records for ASCE/SEI 7 ground-motion scaling procedure , 2011 .

[19]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Seismic performance of low- and medium-rise chevron braced steel frames , 2001 .