When mirrors lie: “Visual capture” of arm position impairs reaching performance

If we stand at a mirror’s edge, we can see one half of our body reflected in the mirror, as if it were the other half of our body, seen “through” the mirror. We used this mirror illusion to examine the effect of conflicts between visually and proprioceptively specified arm positions on subsequent reaching movements made with the unseen right arm. When participants viewed their static left arm in the mirror (i.e., as if it were their right arm), subsequent right-arm reaching movements were affected significantly more when there was conflict between the apparent visual and the proprioceptively specified right-arm positions than when there was no conflict. This result demonstrates that visual capture of arm position can occur when individual body parts are viewed in the mirror and that this capture has a measurable effect on subsequent reaching movements made with an unseen arm. The result has implications for how the brain represents the body across different sensory modalities.

[1]  Karen D Davis,et al.  The effect of tactile and visual sensory inputs on phantom limb awareness. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  H. Pick,et al.  Visual capture produced by prism spectacles , 1965 .

[3]  J. Aselage,et al.  Hemispheric interaction and consciousness: Degree of handedness predicts the intensity of a sensory illusion , 2002, Laterality.

[4]  R. J. Seitz,et al.  Mirror agnosia and mirror ataxia constitute different parietal lobe disorders , 1999, Annals of neurology.

[5]  N Teasdale,et al.  Mirror drawing in a deafferented patient and normal subjects , 1992, Neurology.

[6]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Touching the phantom limb , 1995, Nature.

[7]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[8]  S L Wolf,et al.  Doing It with Mirrors: A Case Study of a Novel Approach to Neurorehabilitation , 2000, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[9]  L. Stone,et al.  Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror , 1999, The Lancet.

[10]  M S Graziano,et al.  Coding the location of the arm by sight. , 2000, Science.

[11]  Tony Ro,et al.  Visual Enhancing of Tactile Perception in the Posterior Parietal Cortex , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Tastevin,et al.  En partant de l'expérience d'Aristote les déplacements artificiels des parties du corps ne sont pas suivis par le sentiment de ces parties ni par les sensations qu'on peut y produire. , 1937 .

[13]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  C. S. Harris Perceptual adaptation to inverted, reversed, and displaced vision. , 1965, Psychological review.

[15]  R B Welch,et al.  An examination of the relationship between visual capture and prism adaptation , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  C. Spence,et al.  Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach , 2003, Current Biology.

[17]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Synaesthesia in the normal limb , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  A. Geva,et al.  Touch feel illusion in schizophrenic patients , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[19]  Torsten Ingemann Nielsen,et al.  VOLITION: A NEW EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH , 1963 .

[20]  C. Spence,et al.  Visual Capture of Touch: Out-of-the-Body Experiences With Rubber Gloves , 2000, Psychological science.

[21]  Studies in the influence of abnormal position upon the motor impulse. , 1904 .

[22]  R. Gregory Mirrors in Mind , 1996 .

[23]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Vectorial coding of movement: vision, proprioception, or both? , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  O. L. Zangwill,et al.  Experimental Finger Dyspraxia , 1952 .