Revision total knee arthroplasty: the end of the allograft era?
暂无分享，去创建一个
[1] A. Hanssen,et al. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up. , 2015, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[2] Stephen D. Fening,et al. Validation study of a pooled electronic healthcare database: the effect of obesity on the revision rate of total knee arthroplasty , 2014, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.
[3] D. Dalury,et al. Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised? , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[4] D. Huten. Femorotibial bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty. , 2013, Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR.
[5] H. Schrøder,et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cones: a randomized radiostereometric analysis with 2 years of follow-up. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[6] Larry E. Miller,et al. Clinical and Economic Burden of Revision Knee Arthroplasty , 2012, Clinical medicine insights. Arthritis and musculoskeletal disorders.
[7] G. Scuderi**,et al. Porous tantalum cones for large metaphyseal tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 2-year follow-up. , 2009, The Journal of arthroplasty.
[8] A. Hanssen,et al. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.