The degree of verb movement in embedded clauses in three varieties of Norwegian

The position of the verb(s) in embedded non-V2 contexts varies in Norwegian dialects. In Eastern Norwegian (EastN), all verbs have to follow all adverbs in non-V2 contexts. In Tromso Northern Norwegian (TrNN) main verbs and non-finite auxiliaries have to follow all adverbs, but finite auxiliaries may precede adverbs they take scope over. In Regional Northern Norwegian (ReNN) all finite verbs (main/auxiliary) may precede all adverbs, and non-finite auxiliaries may precede adverbs they take scope over. These data are accounted for within a remnant movement approach. The variation between the three dialects is argued to follow from differences in how selectional features on auxiliaries and T are checked. It is suggested that auxiliaries are associated with a pair of functional projections (so-called lifters): a VP lifter below and an AdvP lifter above. An auxiliary with these lifters ‘sinks’ below adverbs it takes scope over. Overt feature checking (through adjacency) occurs when the lifters are present; covert feature checking occurs when the lifters are absent. In EastN, overt feature checking, and the lifters, is obligatory for all auxiliaries; in TrNN this is obligatory for non-finite auxiliaries but optional for finite auxiliaries; in ReNN this is optional for all auxiliaries.

[1]  T. Ernst.  The Syntax of Adjuncts , 2002 .

[2]  Peter Svenonius,et al.  Subjects, Expletives, and the EPP , 2002 .

[3]  A. Kemenade.  Verb movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic languages By Sten Vikner (review) , 1995 .

[4]  Marit Julien.  Så vanleg at det kan ikkje avfeiast: om V2 i innføydde setningar. , 2008 .

[5]  Anna-Lena Wiklund,et al.  Rethinking Scandinavian verb movement , 2007 .

[6]  Kristine Bentzen,et al.  What's the better move? On verb placement in Standard and Northern Norwegian , 2005, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[7]  Øystein Nilsen,et al.  Eliminating Positions: Syntax and semantics of sentence modification , 2003 .

[8]  Guglielmo Cinque,et al.  Issues in adverbial syntax , 2004 .

[9]  Peter Svenonius,et al.  Subject Positions and the Placement of Adverbials , 2001 .

[10]  Shlomo Vinker,et al.  Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages , 1995 .

[11]  G. Cinque.  Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective , 1999 .

[12]  Fabian Beijer.  On the Relative Order of Adverbs in the I-domain: A study of English and Swedish , 2005 .

[13]  C. Reiss,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces , 2007 .

[14]  Gisbert Fanselow,et al.  On the correlation between morphology and syntax: The case of V-to-I , 2002 .

[15]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  The new comparative syntax , 2000 .

[16]  Øystein Nilsen,et al.  The syntax of circumstantial adverbials , 2000 .

[17]  S. Vikner.  V°-TO-I° movement and inflection for person in all tenses , 1995 .

[18]  Jonathan Bobaliik.  Adverbs:The Hierarchy Paradox. , 1999 .