Institutionalizing Bicycle and Pedestrian Monitoring Programs in Three States

Information about nonmotorized traffic is needed to support management of transportation systems. However, transportation officials across the United States generally have not monitored nonmotorized traffic, and most agencies lack bicycle and pedestrian counts. This paper describes current efforts by the Colorado, Minnesota, and Oregon Departments of Transportation (DOTs) to establish programs for monitoring non-motorized traffic. With FHWA principles for traffic monitoring as a framework, this case study summarizes state approaches for initiating monitoring, agency collaboration with local governments, and continuous and short-duration monitoring efforts. Agency protocols for data collection, analysis, and management, including development of factors for purposes such as estimating average daily bicyclists or bicycle miles traveled, are also compared. Agency efforts to demonstrate the effectiveness of monitoring technologies are described. This study reveals similar objectives across states, both similarities and differences in approaches, differing rates of implementation, and similar problems in implementation. The paper summarizes lessons learned and identifies challenges that DOTs will face in institutionalizing the monitoring of nonmotorized traffic.

[1]  B. Pushkarev,et al.  PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL DEMAND , 1971 .

[2]  Gary A Davis,et al.  Sample-Based Estimation of Bicycle Miles of Travel (BMT) , 2001 .

[3]  David R. Ragland,et al.  Methodology for Counting Pedestrians at Intersections , 2009 .

[4]  Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos,et al.  Practical Methods for Analyzing Pedestrian and Bicycle Use of a Transportation Facility , 2010 .

[5]  Mara Chagas Diogenes,et al.  Effectiveness of a Commercially Available Automated Pedestrian Counting Device in Urban Environments: Comparison with Manual Counts , 2008 .

[6]  Christopher D Porter,et al.  Forecasting Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel: State of the Practice and Research Needs , 1999 .

[7]  Luis F. Miranda-Moreno,et al.  Classification of Bicycle Traffic Patterns in Five North American Cities , 2013 .

[8]  Mia Birk,et al.  National Bicycle And Pedestrian Documentation Project , 2006 .

[9]  Shawn Turner,et al.  Forecasting Bicycle and Pedestrian Usage and Research Data Collection Equipment , 2010 .

[10]  Daniel P. Piatkowski,et al.  Using Inductive Loops to Count Bicycles in Mixed Traffic , 2011 .

[11]  U. C. Bureau Statistical Abstract of the United States , 2004 .

[12]  D A Noyce,et al.  AN EVALUATION OF TECHNOLOGIES FOR AUTOMATED DETECTION AND CLASSIFICATION OF PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS , 2002 .

[13]  Greg Lindsey,et al.  The Minnesota Bicycle and Pedestrian Counting Initiative: Methodologies for Non-motorized Traffic Monitoring , 2013 .

[14]  Jahanbakhsh Behnam,et al.  A METHOD FOR ESTIMATING PEDESTRIAN VOLUME IN A CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (ABRIDGMENT) , 1977 .

[15]  Xize Wang,et al.  Estimating use of non-motorized infrastructure: Models of bicycle and pedestrian traffic in Minneapolis, MN , 2012 .

[16]  Greg Lindsey,et al.  Estimating Mixed-Mode Urban Trail Traffic Using Negative Binomial Regression Models , 2014 .

[17]  Scott E. Davis,et al.  PREDICTING PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK VOLUMES , 1988 .

[18]  William W. Hunter,et al.  USER COUNTS ON BICYCLE LANES AND MULTIUSE TRAILS IN THE UNITED STATES , 1995 .

[19]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  Investigating the Performance of Automatic Counting Sensors for Pedestrian Traffic Data Collection , 2019 .

[20]  Krista Nordback,et al.  Automated Bicycle Counts , 2010 .

[21]  Mara Chagas Diogenes,et al.  Estimating Pedestrian Accident Exposure: Automated Pedestrian Counting Devices Report , 2007 .

[22]  Robert J. Schneider,et al.  Pedestrian and bicycle data collection in United States communities: quantifying use, surveying users, and documenting facility extent , 2005 .

[23]  Krista Nordback,et al.  Counting Bicyclists with Pneumatic Tube Counters on Shared Roadways , 2014 .