You Can’t Think and Hit at the Same Time: Neural Correlates of Baseball Pitch Classification

Hitting a baseball is often described as the most difficult thing to do in sports. A key aptitude of a good hitter is the ability to determine which pitch is coming. This rapid decision requires the batter to make a judgment in a fraction of a second based largely on the trajectory and spin of the ball. When does this decision occur relative to the ball’s trajectory and is it possible to identify neural correlates that represent how the decision evolves over a split second? Using single-trial analysis of electroencephalography (EEG) we address this question within the context of subjects discriminating three types of pitches (fastball, curveball, slider) based on pitch trajectories. We find clear neural signatures of pitch classification and, using signal detection theory, we identify the times of discrimination on a trial-to-trial basis. Based on these neural signatures we estimate neural discrimination distributions as a function of the distance the ball is from the plate. We find all three pitches yield unique distributions, namely the timing of the discriminating neural signatures relative to the position of the ball in its trajectory. For instance, fastballs are discriminated at the earliest points in their trajectory, relative to the two other pitches, which is consistent with the need for some constant time to generate and execute the motor plan for the swing (or inhibition of the swing). We also find incorrect discrimination of a pitch (errors) yields neural sources in Brodmann Area 10, which has been implicated in prospective memory, recall, and task difficulty. In summary, we show that single-trial analysis of EEG yields informative distributions of the relative point in a baseball’s trajectory when the batter makes a decision on which pitch is coming.

[1]  P. Sajda,et al.  Temporal characterization of the neural correlates of perceptual decision making in the human brain. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Cortical origins of response time variability during rapid discrimination of visual objects , 2005, NeuroImage.

[3]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  Tadahiko Fukuda,et al.  Visual Search Strategies of Baseball Batters: Eye Movements during the Preparatory Phase of Batting , 2002, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  P R De Lucia,et al.  Perceptual Information for Batting Can Be Extracted Throughout a Ball's Trajectory , 1985, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  R. Benoit Functional specialisation within rostral prefrontal cortex , 2010 .

[7]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[8]  M. Shank,et al.  Eye Movements While Viewing a Baseball Pitch , 1987 .

[9]  C. Frith,et al.  Differential involvement of regions of rostral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann area 10) in time- and event-based prospective memory. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[10]  Kimihiro Inomata,et al.  Visual Search Strategies and Decision Making in Baseball Batting , 2009, Perceptual and motor skills.

[11]  Cambridge Educational The physics in baseball , 2004 .

[12]  C. Frith,et al.  Brain regions involved in prospective memory as determined by positron emission tomography , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[14]  C. Janelle,et al.  Perceptual Decision Making for Baseball Pitch Recognition: Using P300 Latency and Amplitude to Index Attentional Processing , 2001, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[15]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Neural Representation of Task Difficulty and Decision Making during Perceptual Categorization: A Timing Diagram , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  P. Pietrini,et al.  Neural correlates of "analytical-specific visual perception" and degree of task difficulty as investigated by the Mangina-Test: a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study in young healthy adults. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  Paul Sajda,et al.  Fast, Exact Model Selection and Permutation Testing for l2-Regularized Logistic Regression , 2012, AISTATS.

[18]  Keith Davids Visual search strategies , 2006 .

[19]  Laura Bottomley,et al.  The Physics Of Sports , 1999 .

[20]  Barak A. Pearlmutter,et al.  Linear Spatial Integration for Single-Trial Detection in Encephalography , 2002, NeuroImage.

[21]  David Friedman,et al.  Single-trial discrimination for integrating simultaneous EEG and fMRI: Identifying cortical areas contributing to trial-to-trial variability in the auditory oddball task , 2009, NeuroImage.

[22]  T. Koenig,et al.  Low resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) functional imaging in acute, neuroleptic-naive, first-episode, productive schizophrenia , 1999, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[23]  S. Scott,et al.  The role of the rostral frontal cortex (area 10) in prospective memory: a lateral versus medial dissociation , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  Stephen Lawrie,et al.  Functional Specialization within Rostral Prefrontal Cortex (Area 10): A Meta-analysis , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  Hierarchical Mixtures of Experts and the EM Algorithm , 1993, Neural Computation.

[26]  N. Alpert,et al.  Conscious recollection and the human hippocampal formation: evidence from positron emission tomography. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Recipes for the linear analysis of EEG , 2005, NeuroImage.