Full Frontal Intimacy - on HCI, Design & Intimacy

The HCI community increasingly expands the borders of what topics are acceptable to explore, discuss and research. Recent workshops and papers on sexuality, intimate facets of the body and other sensitive topics show that intimacy in its widest sense and its impact on people's lives and well-being is relevant to the HCI community. In this paper, we draw on the results of an ongoing literature review on intimacy which shows that the concept is rarely defined, even though it has a variety of meanings. Nonetheless, as the parameters in which intimacy is explored are comparable in many instances, a predominant view prevails on what intimacy means. We share an imaginary abstract that breaks with these conventions and shows potential benefits of expanding the view on intimacy. This provocation therefore urges HCI researchers to rethink their idea of what intimacy is and offers directions of how to do so.

[1]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  Hermes@Home: supporting awareness and intimacy between distant family members , 2006, OZCHI.

[2]  Sanghyun Yoo,et al.  Banana Kiss: A Participatory Interactive Installation to Enhance Intimacy with Kiss Interaction , 2017, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[3]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts , 2014, CHI.

[4]  Mikael B. Skov,et al.  Mediated intimacy in families: understanding the relation between children and parents , 2006, IDC '06.

[5]  Henrik I. Christensen,et al.  "My Roomba Is Rambo": Intimate Home Appliances , 2007, UbiComp.

[6]  Sarah Diefenbach,et al.  All You Need is Love: Current Strategies of Mediating Intimate Relationships through Technology , 2012, TCHI.

[7]  Rob Comber,et al.  On Looking at the Vagina through Labella , 2016, CHI.

[8]  Hong Li,et al.  Review of unconventional user interfaces for emotional communication between long-distance partners , 2018, MobileHCI.

[9]  Steven Gelineck OperaBooth: an installation for intimate remote communication through music , 2014, Audio Mostly Conference.

[10]  Ylva Fernaeus,et al.  Humor in design fiction to suspend disbelief and belief , 2018, NordiCHI.

[11]  Florian Mueller,et al.  Holding hands over a distance: technology probes in an intimate, mobile context , 2006, OZCHI.

[12]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  A stroking device for spatially separated couples , 2008, Mobile HCI.

[13]  Martin R. Gibbs,et al.  SynchroMate: a phatic technology for mediating intimacy , 2005, DUX '05.

[14]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Pleasure is your birthright: digitally enabled designer sex toys as a case of third-wave HCI , 2011, CHI.

[15]  Kristina Höök,et al.  The IKEA Catalogue: Design Fiction in Academic and Industrial Collaborations , 2016, GROUP.

[16]  Alexandra Roatis,et al.  A three-dimensional mirror augmented by medical imaging: questioning self-portraying at the limit of iintimacy , 2014, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[17]  Fabian Hemmert,et al.  Intimate mobiles: grasping, kissing and whispering as a means of telecommunication in mobile phones , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[18]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  United-pulse: feeling your partner's pulse , 2008, Mobile HCI.

[19]  Bruno Dumas,et al.  Designing for intimacy: how fashion design can address privacy issues in wearable computing , 2014, ISWC '14 Adjunct.

[20]  Joseph Lindley,et al.  Pushing the Limits of Design Fiction: The Case For Fictional Research Papers , 2016, CHI.