Leadership and Performance in Virtual Teams: Exploring Brokerage in Electronic Communication

This article explores the structural foundations of leadership and performance in virtual project teams. In an experimental business case, the article demonstrates the effect of structural brokerage in team communication on leadership and team performance. This research suggests that social roles as well as the acknowledgement of leadership and performance are conditional to the way individuals and teams relate to their environment. It supports structural hole theory in that leaders and a winner team achieved the highest values of flow betweenness and network efficiency. Strategically, managers of virtual knowledge networks should focus their attention not only on the qualifications of individuals, but also on communication structures within their work groups.

[1]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Understanding Virtual Team Development: An Interpretive Study , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Anthony R. Hendrickson,et al.  Virtual teams: Technology and the workplace of the future , 1998 .

[3]  Sherry K. Schneider,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION AND SOCIAL INFORMATION: STATUS SALIENCE AND STATUS DIFFERENCES , 1995 .

[4]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  E-Leadership and Virtual Teams , 2008, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[5]  M. Mizruchi.  Social Network Analysis: Recent Achievements and Current Controversies , 1994 .

[6]  Gernot Grabher,et al.  The Project Ecology of Advertising: Tasks, Talents and Teams , 2002 .

[7]  Richard A. Guzzo,et al.  Teams in organizations: recent research on performance and effectiveness. , 1996, Annual review of psychology.

[8]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Emergent leadership in virtual teams: what do emergent leaders do? , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[9]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1999 .

[10]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Attribution of the "causes" of performance: A general alternative interpretation of cross-sectional research on organizations. , 1975 .

[11]  Merrill Warkentin,et al.  Training to improve virtual team communication , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[12]  Jonathon N. Cummings,et al.  Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[13]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[14]  M. Tushman.  Work Characteristics and Subunit Communication Structure: A Contingency Analysis. , 1979 .

[15]  Andrew Parker,et al.  Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks , 2001 .

[16]  Maria Manuela Cunha,et al.  Encyclopedia of Networked and Virtual Organizations , 2007 .

[17]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Leadership Effectiveness in Global Virtual Teams , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  R. Burt.  The contingent value of social capital. , 1997 .

[19]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Social Networks and the Performance of Individuals and Groups , 2001 .

[20]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[21]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Individual Centrality and Performance in Virtual R&D Groups: An Empirical Study , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[22]  Robert R. Faulkner,et al.  Social networks and loss of capital , 2004, Soc. Networks.

[23]  Robin M. Hogarth,et al.  The Social Capital of French and American Managers , 2000 .

[24]  Patrice Braun,et al.  Trust in Networks and Clusters , 2008 .

[25]  Charles B. Shrader,et al.  Attribution Theories of Leadership and Network Analysis , 1986 .

[26]  David Krackardt,et al.  QAP partialling as a test of spuriousness , 1987 .

[27]  Ned Kock,et al.  The Psychobiological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[28]  Gernot Grabher.  Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks? , 2004 .

[29]  Johannes Glückler,et al.  What makes mobile computer supported cooperative work mobile? Towards a better understanding of cooperative mobile interactions , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[30]  D. Krackhardt,et al.  Bringing the Individual Back in: A Structural Analysis of the Internal Market for Reputation in Organizations , 1994 .

[31]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Personality correlates of structural holes , 1998 .

[32]  James C. McElroy,et al.  A Typology of Attribution Leadership Research , 1982 .

[33]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[34]  Sara B. Kiesler,et al.  The Equalization Phenomenon: Status Effects in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Decision-Making Groups , 1991, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[35]  Olivier Caya,et al.  Virtual Teams: What We Know, What We Don't Know , 2005, Int. J. e Collab..

[36]  I. Zigurs.  Leadership in virtual teams: Oxymoron or opportunity? , 2003 .

[37]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Getting It Together: Temporal Coordination and Conflict Management in Global Virtual Teams , 2001 .

[38]  R. Cross,et al.  The people who make organizations go--or stop. , 2002, Harvard business review.

[39]  L. Freeman,et al.  Centrality in valued graphs: A measure of betweenness based on network flow , 1991 .