Cartilage and subchondral bone thickness distribution with MR imaging.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The authors mapped articular cartilage (AC) and subchondral bone (SB) thicknesses in human acetabula in vitro by using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and validated AC measurements by using light microscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Left and right acetabula from a deceased patient who had undergone left hemiarthroplasty were imaged with fat-suppressed spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in the steady state (repetition time = 55 msec, echo time = 15 msec, flip angle = 50 degrees, matrix = 256 x 256, field of view = 8 cm). AC and SB thickness maps were generated from image data by using analytic geometry, which enabled correction for thickness overestimation due to oblique sectioning. Cartilage bone plugs were extracted from the acetabula, and light microscopy was used to validate the thickness measurements obtained with MR imaging. RESULTS Standard errors between thickness measurements obtained with MR imaging and light microscopy were 0.37 and 0.33 mm for the left and right AC, respectively, which is consistent with the voxel resolution of the MR imaging sequence (0.31 x 0.31 x 0.8 mm). SB thickness of the cartilage plugs could not be reliably measured with light microscopy and, therefore, could not be validated. Contour maps showed that SB thickness gradients were rapid and focal compared with the rather smooth gradients in AC thickness; however, thicker AC was accompanied by thicker SB for left (r2 = .261, P = .0001) and right (r2 = .308, P = .0001) acetabula. Average thickness differences between left and right acetabular AC and SB were 0.13 mm (P = .015) and 0.11 mm (P = .026), respectively. Although it was the operated hip that had thicker articular tissues, the differences were within the pixel resolution (< 0.31 mm). CONCLUSION AC and SB thickness distribution can be accurately determined by combining noninvasive MR imaging and analytic geometry, which may also provide a means for quantitative, longitudinal assessment of focal AC defects.

[1]  H J Kurrat,et al.  The thickness of the cartilage in the hip joint. , 1978, Journal of anatomy.

[2]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Chemical composition and swelling of normal and osteoarthrotic femoral head cartilage. II. Swelling. , 1977, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  D Resnick,et al.  Width of the articular cartilage of the hip: quantification by using fat-suppression spin-echo MR imaging in cadavers. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  W M Lai,et al.  Biphasic indentation of articular cartilage--II. A numerical algorithm and an experimental study. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  D. Disler,et al.  Fat-suppressed spoiled GRASS imaging of knee hyaline cartilage: technique optimization and comparison with conventional MR imaging. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  D. Disler,et al.  Accuracy of Volume Measurements of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phantoms by Three-Dimensional Reconstruction and Preliminary Clinical Application , 1994, Investigative radiology.

[7]  V C Mow,et al.  Quantitation of articular surface topography and cartilage thickness in knee joints using stereophotogrammetry. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  A. Grodzinsky,et al.  Cartilage electromechanics--I. Electrokinetic transduction and the effects of electrolyte pH and ionic strength. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Roland W. Moskowitz,et al.  Osteoarthritis: Diagnosis and Medical/Surgical Management , 1992 .

[10]  R W Mann,et al.  Optical verification of a technique for in situ ultrasonic measurement of articular cartilage thickness. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  F Eckstein,et al.  The potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for quantifying articular cartilage thickness -- a methodological study. , 1995, Clinical biomechanics.

[12]  W E Palmer,et al.  Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with three-dimensional MR imaging. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[13]  R N Villar,et al.  Diagnosis of the painful hip by magnetic resonance imaging and arthroscopy. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[14]  C. Ohlsson,et al.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  D Resnick,et al.  Knee Joint Hyaline Cartilage Defects: A Comparative Study of MR and Anatomic Sections , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  J. B. Kneeland,et al.  Articular cartilage: correlation of histologic zones with signal intensity at MR imaging. , 1991, Radiology.

[17]  G. Bentley,et al.  Repair of articular surfaces by allografts of articular and growth-plate cartilage. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[18]  F Eckstein,et al.  Non-invasive determination of cartilage thickness throughout joint surfaces using magnetic resonance imaging. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  D Resnick,et al.  Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the knee: analysis of available MR techniques. , 1993, Radiology.

[20]  V. Mow,et al.  Determination of in situ contact areas in diarthrodial joints by MRI , 1995 .

[21]  C C Glüer,et al.  Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. , 1994, Radiology.

[22]  H. Mankin,et al.  The response of articular cartilage to mechanical injury. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  M. Helvie,et al.  Precision of Hyaline Cartilage Thickness Measurements , 1992, Acta radiologica.

[24]  R M Henkelman,et al.  Effects of collagen orientation on MR imaging characteristics of bovine articular cartilage. , 1993, Radiology.

[25]  P. D. Rushfeldt,et al.  Improved techniques for measuring in vitro the geometry and pressure distribution in the human acetabulum--I. Ultrasonic measurement of acetabular surfaces, sphericity and cartilage thickness. , 1981, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  J S Jurvelin,et al.  Comparison of optical, needle probe and ultrasonic techniques for the measurement of articular cartilage thickness. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  S Sinha,et al.  MR imaging of joints: analytic optimization of GRE techniques at 1.5 T. , 1992, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  B. Weightman,et al.  Mechanical and biochemical properties of human articular cartilage in osteoarthritic femoral heads and in autopsy specimens. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[29]  N. Kawabe,et al.  The repair of full-thickness articular cartilage defects. Immune responses to reparative tissue formed by allogeneic growth plate chondrocyte implants. , 1991, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[30]  J. Kofod,et al.  Moore prosthesis in the treatment of fresh femoral neck fractures. A critical review with special attention to secondary acetabular degeneration. , 1983, Injury.

[31]  H. Rechl,et al.  Structure, function, and degeneration of bovine hyaline cartilage: assessment with MR imaging in vitro. , 1989, Radiology.

[32]  V. Pellegrini,et al.  Rate of degeneration of human acetabular cartilage after hemiarthroplasty. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.