A Geodesign approach to environmental design education: Framing the pedagogy, evaluating the results

Abstract This paper examines the outcomes of a Geodesign approach to training undergraduates and graduate students in environmental design and related professions. The focus of this paper is on the role of Geodesign in generalist environmental design training. This paper is organized in three parts. First, it describes a conceptual framework for Geodesign that seats it within a context of theory and practice. Second, we present a case study of the University of Colorado Geodesign program, including, at the time under review in this case, undergraduate and masters programs in architecture, landscape architecture and planning. Third, we reflect back both on the conceptual framework and the experience of the University of Colorado. In this research we developed an instrument with which to evaluate final class projects, and assess learning outcomes of beginning and advanced studios, special topics classes and Geodesign modules. While a number of Geodesign programs are underway relatively little has been written about Geodesign pedagogy. This paper explores issues and opportunities in Geodesign education based on the University of Colorado case.

[1]  M. Batty.  A CHRONICLE OF SCIENTIFIC PLANNING - THE ANGLO-AMERICAN MODELING EXPERIENCE , 1994 .

[2]  Lewis D. Hopkins.  Planning support systems for cities and regions , 2011, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[3]  David L. Tulloch.  Learning from students: geodesign lessons from the regional design studio , 2013 .

[4]  Thierry Ramadier,et al.  Transdisciplinarity and its challenges: the case of urban studies , 2004 .

[5]  R. Forman.  Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions , 1995 .

[6]  Andrés Manuel García,et al.  Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes: A review and analysis , 2010 .

[7]  Manfred A. Max-Neef.  Foundations of transdisciplinarity , 2005 .

[8]  Kees Dorst,et al.  The core of ‘design thinking’ and its application , 2011 .

[9]  C. Jacobson.  Identification and quantification of the hydrological impacts of imperviousness in urban catchments: a review. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Ali Mansourian,et al.  A web-based spatial decision support system to enhance public participation in urban planning processes , 2011 .

[11]  R. Klosterman.  Planning Support Systems: A New Perspective on Computer-Aided Planning , 1997 .

[12]  Greg Brown,et al.  Values Compatibility Analysis: Using Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) for Decision Support in National Forest Management , 2012 .

[13]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work , 2011 .

[14]  Frederick Steiner,et al.  The living landscape : an ecological approach to landscape planning , 2000 .

[15]  Andre Botequilha Leitão,et al.  Measuring Landscapes: A Planner's Handbook , 2006 .

[16]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[17]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[18]  J. Forester.  On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations , 2013 .

[19]  Thomas W. Paradis,et al.  Geodesign meets curriculum design: integrating geodesign approaches into undergraduate programs , 2013 .

[20]  Gregory Brown,et al.  Social Landscape Metrics: Measures for Understanding Place Values from Public Participation Geographic Information Systems (PPGIS) , 2012 .

[21]  I. Mcharg.  Design With Nature , 1969 .

[22]  Carl Steinitz,et al.  A Framework for Geodesign: Changing Geography by Design , 2012 .