Iterative image reconstruction for positron emission tomography based on a detector response function estimated from point source measurements

The accuracy of the system model in an iterative reconstruction algorithm greatly affects the quality of reconstructed positron emission tomography (PET) images. For efficient computation in reconstruction, the system model in PET can be factored into a product of a geometric projection matrix and sinogram blurring matrix, where the former is often computed based on analytical calculation, and the latter is estimated using Monte Carlo simulations. Direct measurement of a sinogram blurring matrix is difficult in practice because of the requirement of a collimated source. In this work, we propose a method to estimate the 2D blurring kernels from uncollimated point source measurements. Since the resulting sinogram blurring matrix stems from actual measurements, it can take into account the physical effects in the photon detection process that are difficult or impossible to model in a Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, and hence provide a more accurate system model. Another advantage of the proposed method over MC simulation is that it can easily be applied to data that have undergone a transformation to reduce the data size (e.g., Fourier rebinning). Point source measurements were acquired with high count statistics in a relatively fine grid inside the microPET II scanner using a high-precision 2D motion stage. A monotonically convergent iterative algorithm has been derived to estimate the detector blurring matrix from the point source measurements. The algorithm takes advantage of the rotational symmetry of the PET scanner and explicitly models the detector block structure. The resulting sinogram blurring matrix is incorporated into a maximum a posteriori (MAP) image reconstruction algorithm. The proposed method has been validated using a 3 x 3 line phantom, an ultra-micro resolution phantom and a (22)Na point source superimposed on a warm background. The results of the proposed method show improvements in both resolution and contrast ratio when compared with the MAP reconstruction with a MC-based sinogram blurring matrix, and one without a detector response model. The reconstruction time is unaffected by the new method since the blurring component takes a relatively small part of the overall reconstruction time. The proposed method can be applied to other PET scanners for human and animal imaging.

[1]  M. King,et al.  Attenuation compensation for cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging: Part 1. Impact of attenuation and methods of estimating attenuation maps , 1995, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[2]  Donald W. Wilson,et al.  FastSPECT II: a second-generation high-resolution dynamic SPECT imager , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  M A Viergever,et al.  Estimation of the depth-dependent component of the point spread function of SPECT. , 1999, Medical physics.

[4]  Grant T. Gullberg,et al.  Implementation of a model-based nonuniform scatter correction scheme for SPECT , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  E. Veklerov,et al.  MLE reconstruction of a brain phantom using a Monte Carlo transition matrix and a statistical stopping rule , 1988 .

[6]  Jinyi Qi Maximum-Likelihood Estimation of Detector Response for PET Image Reconstruction , 2006, 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  R. Leahy,et al.  Model-based normalization for iterative 3D PET image reconstruction , 2002 .

[8]  M. Rafecas,et al.  Use of a Monte Carlo-based probability matrix for 3-D iterative reconstruction of MADPET-II data , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[9]  E C Frey,et al.  The importance and implementation of accurate 3D compensation methods for quantitative SPECT. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3-D whole body PET , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[11]  B.M.W. Tsui,et al.  Quantitative cardiac SPECT reconstruction with reduced image degradation due to patient anatomy , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[12]  E. Ficaro,et al.  Advances in quantitative perfusion SPECT imaging , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[13]  C.A. Bouman,et al.  Quantitative comparison of FBP, EM, and Bayesian reconstruction algorithms for the IndyPET scanner , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  High-resolution image reconstruction for PET using estimated detector response functions , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[15]  T G Turkington,et al.  A 3D model of non-uniform attenuation and detector response for efficient iterative reconstruction in SPECT. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  S R Meikle,et al.  Transmission-based scatter correction of 180 degrees myocardial single-photon emission tomographic studies. , 1996, European journal of nuclear medicine.

[17]  Vladimir Y. Panin,et al.  Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  E. DiBella,et al.  Analytical propagation of errors in dynamic SPECT: estimators, degrading factors, bias and noise. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  R. Leahy,et al.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  S. Cherry,et al.  MicroPET II: design, development and initial performance of an improved microPET scanner for small-animal imaging. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Exact and approximate rebinning algorithms for 3-D PET data , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  M. Casey,et al.  PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[23]  M A King,et al.  A Monte Carlo investigation of artifacts caused by liver uptake in single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion imaging with technetium 99m-labeled agents , 1996, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[24]  J. Fessler,et al.  Simultaneous transmission/emission myocardial perfusion tomography. Diagnostic accuracy of attenuation-corrected 99mTc-sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. , 1996, Circulation.

[25]  M A Viergever,et al.  SPECT scatter modelling in non-uniform attenuating objects. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Brian F. Hutton Cardiac single-photon emission tomography: Is attenuation correction enough? , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  R. Leahy,et al.  Accurate geometric and physical response modelling for statistical image reconstruction in high resolution PET , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[28]  R.L. Harrison,et al.  Measured spatially variant system response for PET image reconstruction , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[29]  Roger Lecomte,et al.  Detector response models for statistical iterative image reconstruction in high resolution PET , 1998 .

[30]  G. Gullberg,et al.  A three-dimensional ray-driven attenuation, scatter and geometric response correction technique for SPECT in inhomogeneous media. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  Brian F. Hutton,et al.  Transmission-based scatter correction of 180° myocardial single-photon emission tomographic studies , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.