The effect of stiffness on the localization of tensile stress at the surface of bonded posterior restorations.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to assess the distribution of tensile stress under the conditions representative of tooth-food contact in a restored posterior tooth. The ideal stiffness for a bonded restoration will be predicted. METHODS A two-dimensional plane-strain finite element representation of a restored first maxillary molar is created. The restoration with Class I/II bucco-lingual geometry is assigned a range of Young's moduli (E = 10-80 GPa), representative of the range of materials available. In addition, a hypothetical multi-phase model, in which stiffness is gradually increased from the intercuspal concavity to the adjacent enamel, is also created. A food particle is modeled and pushed close to the interface onto the site of (1) intact enamel and (2) restored surface. RESULTS For all single-phase models tested, the magnitude of tensile stress at the surface is far greater than that present elsewhere in the tooth. However, the exact position and magnitude of the maximum tensile stress varied according to the modulus assigned to the restoration and the position of load. The results of the model imply that interfacial problems are likely in low-modulus restorations (E = 10-20 GPa), whereas stress-related problems could occur in the intercuspal concavity of high-modulus restorations (E = 40-80 GPa). Of all the single-phase models, tensile stresses are lowest when the Young's modulus assigned to the restoration is 30 GPa. These tensile stresses are reduced in the multi-phase model. SIGNIFICANCE Given the limitations of the model, the results indicate that the most suitable modulus for a single-phase posterior bonded restoration is around 30 GPa. Such a modulus is approached in compact-filled composites. In addition, the highly desirable dissipation of load in the multi-phase model should warrant further investigation. It is suggested that the use of an incremental filling technique with region-specific proportions of hard-filler could be one way forward.

[1]  K Asaoka,et al.  Effects of Creep Value and Occlusal Force on Marginal Adaptation of Amalgam Filling , 1994, Journal of dentistry research.

[2]  A J Plasschaert,et al.  Clinical Science The Influence of Modification of Cavity Design on Distribution of Stresses in a Restored Molar , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[3]  J. Rees,et al.  Finite element stress analysis of restored teeth. , 1987, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[4]  R DeLong,et al.  Development of an Artificial Oral Environment for the Testing of Dental Restoratives: Bi-axial Force and Movement Control , 1983, Journal of dental research.

[5]  J. Katz,et al.  Elastic Properties of Dental Resin Restorative Materials , 1974, Journal of dental research.

[6]  P. Lucas,et al.  The ecology of Mezzettia leptopoda (Hk. f. et Thoms.) Oliv. (Annonaceae) seeds as viewed from a mechanical perspective , 1991 .

[7]  I C Howard,et al.  The Effects of Enamel Anisotropy on the Distribution of Stress in a Tooth , 1993, Journal of dental research.

[8]  H. Shimokobe,et al.  Deformation of cavities and resin fillings in loaded teeth. , 1976, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[9]  A. H. Tjan,et al.  Effect of various incremental techniques on the marginal adaptation of class II composite resin restorations. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  R. Bowen,et al.  Tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of tooth structure and several restorative materials. , 1962, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[11]  V K Goel,et al.  Effect of cavity depth on stresses in a restored tooth. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  Julian Vincent,et al.  The mechanical properties of biological materials , 1979 .

[13]  C. Davidson,et al.  Effect of mechanical load cycling on the marginal integrity of adhesive Class I resin composite restorations. , 1996, Journal of dentistry.

[14]  G Willems,et al.  A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[15]  W. Eakle,et al.  Fractures of posterior teeth in adults. , 1986, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[16]  W H Douglas,et al.  Considerations for modeling. , 1996, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[17]  A L Yettram,et al.  Finite Element Stress Analysis of the Crowns of Normal and Restored Teeth , 1976, Journal of dental research.

[18]  A. Heuer,et al.  Fracture Properties of Human Enamel and Dentin , 1976, Journal of dental research.

[19]  H. W. Poort,et al.  Biomechanical Stress Analysis of the Amalgam-Tooth Interface , 1983 .

[20]  H. Saunders,et al.  Mechanics of Materials (2nd Ed.) , 1986 .

[21]  W H Douglas,et al.  A simple model of crack propagation in dental restorations. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[22]  M. Cross,et al.  Does an Incremental Filling Technique Reduce Polymerization Shrinkage Stresses? , 1996, Journal of dental research.

[23]  Waters Ne,et al.  Some mechanical and physical properties of teeth. , 1980 .

[24]  J. Kirkham,et al.  Dental enamel : formation to destruction , 1995 .

[25]  M C Peters,et al.  Distributed Crack Analysis of Ceramic Inlays , 1993, Journal of dental research.

[26]  I. Spears,et al.  A Three-dimensional Finite Element Model of Prismatic Enamel: A Re-appraisal of the Data on the Young's Modulus of Enamel , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[27]  H. Fransson,et al.  Compressive fracture resistance of the marginal ridge in large Class II tunnels restored with cermet and composite resin. , 1994, Swedish dental journal.

[28]  R DeLong,et al.  Independent movement of cusps during occlusal loading. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[29]  I. C. Howard,et al.  A study of the interfacial shear and tensile stresses in a restored molar tooth. , 1988, Journal of dentistry.

[30]  G. Macho,et al.  Enamel thickness and the helicoidal occlusal plane. , 1994, American journal of physical anthropology.