Finite element modeling of resurfacing hip prosthesis: estimation of accuracy through experimental validation.

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing is becoming increasingly popular, and a number of new devices have been recently introduced that, in the short term, appear to have satisfactory outcome but many questions are still open on the biomechanics of the resurfaced femur. This could be investigated by means of finite element analysis, but, in order to be effective in discerning potential critical conditions, the accuracy of the models' predictions should be assessed. The major goal of this study was to validate, through a combined experimental-numerical study, a finite element modeling procedure for the simulation of resurfaced femurs. In addition, a preliminary biomechanical analysis of the changes induced in the femoral neck biomechanics by the presence of the device was performed, under a physiologic range of hip joint reaction directions. For this purpose, in vitro tests and a finite element model based on the same specimen were developed using a cadaver femur. The study focused on the Conserve Plus, one of the most common contemporary resurfacing designs. Five loading configurations were identified to correspond to the extremes of physiological directions for the hip joint. The agreement between experimental measurements and numerical predictions was good both in the prediction of the femoral strains (R(2)>0.9), and in the prosthesis micromotions (error<20 microm), giving confidence in the model predictions. The preliminary biomechanical analysis indicated that the strains in the femoral neck are moderately affected by the presence of the prosthesis, apart from localized strain increments that can be considerable, always predicted near the stem. Low micromotions and contact pressure were predicted, suggesting a good stability of the prosthesis. The model accuracy was good in the prediction of the femoral strains and moderately good in the prediction of the bone-prosthesis micromovements. Although the investigated loading conditions were not completely physiological, the preliminary biomechanical analysis showed relatively small changes for the proximal femur after implantation. This validated model can support realistic simulations to examine physiological load configurations and the effects of variations in prosthesis design and implantation technique.

[1]  B Reggiani,et al.  Predicting the subject-specific primary stability of cementless implants during pre-operative planning: preliminary validation of subject-specific finite-element models. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[2]  M Viceconti,et al.  Changes in femur stress after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: response to physiological loads. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[3]  T. Seyler,et al.  Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty , 2006, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[4]  D. Mcminn,et al.  History and modern concepts in surface replacement , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[5]  Fabio Baruffaldi,et al.  Specialised CT scan protocols for 3-D pre-operative planning of total hip replacement. , 2004, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  M. N. Smith-Petersen,et al.  ARTHROPLASTY OF THE HIP , 1939 .

[7]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models implementing a maximum principal strain criterion are able to estimate failure risk and fracture location on human femurs tested in vitro. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  P. Roberts,et al.  The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. , 2005, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[9]  A R Ingraffea,et al.  Mechanical characteristics of the stem‐cement interface , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  H. Amstutz,et al.  Porous ingrowth in canine resurfacing hip arthroplasty: analysis of results with up to a 2-year follow-up. , 1984, The Hip.

[11]  P Roberts,et al.  Strain pattern following surface replacement of the hip , 2008, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[12]  N Shiba,et al.  Biomechanical study of the resurfacing hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis of the femoral component. , 2000, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: An in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Michael M Morlock,et al.  Modes of implant failure after hip resurfacing: morphological and wear analysis of 267 retrieval specimens. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  S M Kurtz,et al.  Biomechanics of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[16]  J. M. Lee,et al.  Observations on the Effect of Movement on Bone Ingrowth into Porous‐Surfaced Implants , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  L Cristofolini,et al.  Methods for quantitative analysis of the primary stability in uncemented hip prostheses. , 1999, Artificial organs.

[18]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  A new method to compare planned and achieved position of an orthopaedic implant , 2003, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[19]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Trabecular bone modulus-density relationships depend on anatomic site. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  W A Kalender,et al.  A phantom for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by QCT and DXA: design considerations and specifications. , 1992, Medical physics.

[21]  P. Campbell,et al.  Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  W Rüther,et al.  Biomechanical, morphological, and histological analysis of early failures in hip resurfacing arthroplasty , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[23]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Comparative in vitro study on the long term performance of cemented hip stems: validation of a protocol to discriminate between "good" and "bad" designs. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  Harlan C. Amstutz,et al.  Metal on Metal Bearings in Hip Arthroplasty , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[25]  D W Murray,et al.  Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[26]  L Cristofolini,et al.  A critical analysis of stress shielding evaluation of hip prostheses. , 1997, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[27]  D J Beard,et al.  The five-year results of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[28]  D W Murray,et al.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A two-year study. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[29]  M. Daniel,et al.  Computer Determination of Contact Stress Distribution and Size of Weight Bearing Area in the Human Hip Joint , 2002, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[30]  D. Howie,et al.  Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years. , 1990, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Pre-clinical validation of joint prostheses: a systematic approach. , 2009, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[32]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[33]  W. Head,et al.  Wagner surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Analysis of fourteen failures in forty-one hips. , 1981, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[34]  I A J Radcliffe,et al.  Investigation into the affect of cementing techniques on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[35]  S J Eastaugh-Waring,et al.  Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. , 2006, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[36]  W. Krause,et al.  Fatigue properties of acrylic bone cement: S-N, P-N, and P-S-N data. , 1988, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[37]  H. Amstutz,et al.  Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[38]  D. Bartel,et al.  Surgical Variables Affect the Mechanics of a Hip Resurfacing System , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[39]  A Arndt,et al.  Stability of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty at two years. A radiostereophotogrammetric analysis study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[40]  R. Huiskes,et al.  The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[41]  D W Murray,et al.  The anterolateral approach leads to less disruption of the femoral head-neck blood supply than the posterior approach during hip resurfacing. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[42]  P Roberts,et al.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: The evolution of contemporary designs , 2006, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[43]  L Cristofolini,et al.  Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[44]  M. Viceconti,et al.  Strain distribution in the proximal human femoral metaphysis , 2009, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[45]  D. Back,et al.  Femoral neck fractures following Birmingham hip resurfacing: a national review of 50 cases. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[46]  Z. Jin,et al.  Elastohydrodynamic lubrication analysis of metal-on-metal hip-resurfacing prostheses. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[47]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Border-tracing algorithm implementation for the femoral geometry reconstruction , 2001, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[48]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  A simple error estimator and adaptive procedure for practical engineerng analysis , 1987 .

[49]  Mark Taylor,et al.  Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[50]  G. Bergmann,et al.  Hip contact forces and gait patterns from routine activities. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[51]  J Schatzker,et al.  A study of implant failure in the Wagner resurfacing arthroplasty. , 1985, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[52]  M. Freeman,et al.  ICLH surface replacement of the hip. An analysis of the first 10 years. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[53]  P. Pynsent,et al.  Metal on Metal Surface Replacement of the Hip: Experience of the McMinn Prosthesis , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[54]  P B Pynsent,et al.  Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[55]  N Rushton,et al.  Proximal femoral surface strain gauge analysis of a new epiphyseal prosthesis. , 1989, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[56]  J H Keyak,et al.  Estimation of material properties in the equine metacarpus with use of quantitative computed tomography , 1994, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[57]  J Bare,et al.  Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty. , 2005, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[58]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[59]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  Mechanical effects of the use of vancomycin and meropenem in acrylic bone cement , 2006, Acta orthopaedica.

[60]  F. Dorey,et al.  THARIES Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Evolution and Long‐term Results , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[61]  J Charnley,et al.  Arthroplasty of the hip. A new operation. , 1961, Lancet.

[62]  W. Walter,et al.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the Australian experience. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[63]  M A Ritter,et al.  Conventional versus resurfacing total hip arthroplasty. A long-term prospective study of concomitant bilateral implantation of prostheses. , 1986, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[64]  C. Hing,et al.  The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[65]  S M Kurtz,et al.  A small punch test technique for characterizing the elastic modulus and fracture behavior of PMMA bone cement used in total joint replacement. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[66]  P B Pynsent,et al.  Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[67]  Mark Taylor Finite element analysis of the resurfaced femoral head. , 2006 .

[68]  L Cristofolini,et al.  In-vitro method for assessing femoral implant—bone micromotions in resurfacing hip implants under different loading conditions , 2007, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[69]  Barbara Reggiani,et al.  Finite-Element Modeling of Bones From CT Data: Sensitivity to Geometry and Material Uncertainties , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[70]  H. Wagner,et al.  Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. , 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[71]  F. Dorey,et al.  Survivorship comparison of THARIES and conventional hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 40 years old. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[72]  T Nishii,et al.  Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[73]  F. Dorey,et al.  Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip , 1998, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[74]  Mark Taylor,et al.  Investigation into the effect of varus-valgus orientation on load transfer in the resurfaced femoral head: a multi-femur finite element analysis. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[75]  A Shimmin,et al.  Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[76]  M. Viceconti,et al.  The material mapping strategy influences the accuracy of CT-based finite element models of bones: an evaluation against experimental measurements. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.