Microbubbles in ultrasound-triggered drug and gene delivery.

Ultrasound contrast agents, in the form of gas-filled microbubbles, are becoming popular in perfusion monitoring; they are employed as molecular imaging agents. Microbubbles are manufactured from biocompatible materials, they can be injected intravenously, and some are approved for clinical use. Microbubbles can be destroyed by ultrasound irradiation. This destruction phenomenon can be applied to targeted drug delivery and enhancement of drug action. The ultrasonic field can be focused at the target tissues and organs; thus, selectivity of the treatment can be improved, reducing undesirable side effects. Microbubbles enhance ultrasound energy deposition in the tissues and serve as cavitation nuclei, increasing intracellular drug delivery. DNA delivery and successful tissue transfection are observed in the areas of the body where ultrasound is applied after intravascular administration of microbubbles and plasmid DNA. Accelerated blood clot dissolution in the areas of insonation by cooperative action of thrombolytic agents and microbubbles is demonstrated in several clinical trials.

[1]  Xiaohong Li,et al.  In Vitro Protein Release and Degradation of Poly-dl-lactide-poly(ethylene glycol) Microspheres with Entrapped Human Serum Albumin: Quantitative Evaluation of the Factors Involved in Protein Release Phases , 2004, Pharmaceutical Research.

[2]  Raffi Bekeredjian,et al.  Augmentation of cardiac protein delivery using ultrasound targeted microbubble destruction. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[3]  E. Unger,et al.  MRX 501: a novel ultrasound contrast agent with therapeutic properties. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[4]  Stefaan C De Smedt,et al.  Ultrasound-responsive polymer-coated microbubbles that bind and protect DNA. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[5]  Xie Kechang Advances and prospects of methand fuel , 2008 .

[6]  Jonathan R. Lindner,et al.  Imaging Tumor Angiogenesis With Contrast Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to &agr;v&bgr;3 , 2003 .

[7]  M. Wheatley,et al.  Development and characterization of a nano-scale contrast agent. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[8]  T. Kissel,et al.  Effects of salt addition on the microencapsulation of proteins using W/O/W double emulsion technique , 2000, Journal of microencapsulation.

[9]  G Trübestein,et al.  Thrombolysis by ultrasound. , 1976, Clinical science and molecular medicine. Supplement.

[10]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Micromanipulation of endothelial cells: ultrasound-microbubble-cell interaction. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  D. Crossman,et al.  Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound for vascular gene delivery , 2000, Gene Therapy.

[12]  C. Xiong,et al.  Optimization of preparative conditions for poly-DL-lactide- polyethylene glycol microspheres with entrapped Vibrio cholera antigens. , 1999, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[13]  Y. Izumi,et al.  Inhibition of melanoma by ultrasound-microbubble-aided drug delivery suggests membrane permeabilization , 2007, Cancer biology & therapy.

[14]  William R Wagner,et al.  Ultrasonic imaging of tumor angiogenesis using contrast microbubbles targeted via the tumor-binding peptide arginine-arginine-leucine. , 2005, Cancer research.

[15]  P A van Der Wouw,et al.  Premature ventricular contractions during triggered imaging with ultrasound contrast. , 2000, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[16]  M. Alonso,et al.  Protein encapsulation and release from poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres: effect of the protein and polymer properties and of the co-encapsulation of surfactants. , 1998, European journal of pharmaceutics and biopharmaceutics : official journal of Arbeitsgemeinschaft fur Pharmazeutische Verfahrenstechnik e.V.

[17]  M. Kohno,et al.  Treatment of ischemic limbs based on local recruitment of vascular endothelial growth factor-producing inflammatory cells with ultrasonic microbubble destruction. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  N. Pandian,et al.  Therapeutic Ultrasound in Cardiology , 2002, Herz.

[19]  Douglas L. Miller Overview of experimental studies of biological effects of medical ultrasound caused by gas body activation and inertial cavitation. , 2007, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[20]  Raquel Delgado-Mederos,et al.  Microbubble administration accelerates clot lysis during continuous 2-MHz ultrasound monitoring in stroke patients treated with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator. , 2006, Stroke.

[21]  M. Kurosaka,et al.  Sustained Transgene Expression in Intervertebral Disc Cells In Vivo Mediated by Microbubble-Enhanced Ultrasound Gene Therapy , 2006, Spine.

[22]  William R Wagner,et al.  Targeted ultrasound contrast agents: in vitro assessment of endothelial dysfunction and multi-targeting to ICAM-1 and sialyl Lewisx. , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  Ji Song,et al.  Influence of injection site, microvascular pressure and ultrasound variables on microbubble-mediated delivery of microspheres to muscle. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  Raffi Bekeredjian,et al.  Optimization of ultrasound parameters for cardiac gene delivery of adenoviral or plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid by ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[25]  H. Matsubara,et al.  Myocardium-targeted delivery of endothelial progenitor cells by ultrasound-mediated microbubble destruction improves cardiac function via an angiogenic response. , 2006, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[26]  J. Powers,et al.  Premature Ventricular Contractions During Triggered Imaging With Ultrasound Contrast. , 2000, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[27]  R. Shohet,et al.  DNA-loaded albumin microbubbles enhance ultrasound-mediated transfection in vitro. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[28]  P. Dayton,et al.  Acoustic radiation force in vivo: a mechanism to assist targeting of microbubbles. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[29]  C. Van de Wiele,et al.  Radioimmunoimaging. Advances and prospects. , 2004, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of....

[30]  Koichi Ogawa,et al.  Induction of cell-membrane porosity by ultrasound , 1999, The Lancet.

[31]  K. Tachibana,et al.  High-resolution scanning electron microscopic evaluation of cell-membrane porosity by ultrasound , 2001, Medical Electron Microscopy.

[32]  Hui-Xiong Xu,et al.  Microbubble-enhanced ultrasound exposure improves gene transfer in vascular endothelial cells. , 2006, World journal of gastroenterology.

[33]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Two-dimensional contrast echocardiography. II. Transpulmonary studies. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  D. H. Mellor,et al.  Real time , 1981 .

[35]  F J Ten Cate,et al.  Two-dimensional contrast echocardiography. I. In vitro development and quantitative analysis of echo contrast agents. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  Ryuichi Morishita,et al.  Local Delivery of Plasmid DNA Into Rat Carotid Artery Using Ultrasound , 2002, Circulation.

[37]  J. Israelachvili,et al.  Impact of polymer tether length on multiple ligand-receptor bond formation. , 2001, Science.

[38]  N. Kipshidze,et al.  Systemic targeted delivery of antisense with perflourobutane gas microbubble carrier reduced neointimal formation in the porcine coronary restenosis model. , 2003, Cardiovascular radiation medicine.

[39]  B. Gerber,et al.  Myocardial delivery of colloid nanoparticles using ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction. , 2006, European heart journal.

[40]  S. Kaul,et al.  Interactions between microbubbles and ultrasound: in vitro and in vivo observations. , 1997, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[41]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Microbubbles induce renal hemorrhage when exposed to diagnostic ultrasound in anesthetized rats. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[42]  D. Stewart,et al.  Therapeutic Arteriogenesis by Ultrasound-Mediated VEGF165 Plasmid Gene Delivery to Chronically Ischemic Skeletal Muscle , 2007, Circulation research.

[43]  Sanjiv Kaul,et al.  Targeted tissue transfection with ultrasound destruction of plasmid-bearing cationic microbubbles. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[44]  T. Porter,et al.  Thrombolytic enhancement with perfluorocarbon-exposed sonicated dextrose albumin microbubbles. , 1996, American heart journal.

[45]  P. Dayton,et al.  Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[46]  S. Kaul,et al.  In vivo myocardial kinetics of air-filled albumin microbubbles during myocardial contrast echocardiography. Comparison with radiolabeled red blood cells. , 1994, Circulation research.

[47]  T. Kissel,et al.  Brush-like branched biodegradable polyesters, part III. Protein release from microspheres of poly(vinyl alcohol)-graft-poly(D,L-lactic-co-glycolic acid). , 2001, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[48]  S S Segal,et al.  The behavior of sonicated albumin microbubbles within the microcirculation: a basis for their use during myocardial contrast echocardiography. , 1989, Circulation research.

[49]  Bogdan Draganski,et al.  Observation on the Integrity of the Blood‐Brain Barrier After Microbubble Destruction by Diagnostic Transcranial Color‐Coded Sonography , 2002, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[50]  S. Rajagopalan,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated transfection of canine myocardium by intravenous administration of cationic microbubble-linked plasmid DNA. , 2002, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[51]  S. Kaul,et al.  Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[52]  D. Crommelin,et al.  Adhesion molecules: a new target for immunoliposome‐mediated drug delivery , 1995, FEBS letters.

[53]  S. Kaul,et al.  Quantifying myocardial blood flow with contrast echocardiography. , 1993, American journal of cardiac imaging.

[54]  A. Kabalnov,et al.  Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 1. Theory. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[55]  David Needham,et al.  The Influence of Tiered Layers of Surface-Grafted Poly(ethylene glycol) on Receptor−Ligand-Mediated Adhesion between Phospholipid Monolayer-Stabilized Microbubbles and Coated Glass Beads , 2000 .

[56]  Y. Mori,et al.  Targeted delivery of bone marrow mononuclear cells by ultrasound destruction of microbubbles induces both angiogenesis and arteriogenesis response. , 2005, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[57]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Radiation-Force Assisted Targeting Facilitates Ultrasonic Molecular Imaging , 2004 .

[58]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Focused ultrasound for blood–brain disruption and delivery of therapeutic molecules into the brain , 2007, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[59]  P. Riesz,et al.  Effect of gas-containing microspheres and echo contrast agents on free radical formation by ultrasound. , 1998, Free radical biology & medicine.

[60]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  Targeted delivery of doxorubicin to the rat brain at therapeutic levels using MRI‐guided focused ultrasound , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[61]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Ultrasound Radiation Force Modulates Ligand Availability on Targeted Contrast Agents , 2006, Molecular imaging.

[62]  N de Jong,et al.  Absorption and scatter of encapsulated gas filled microspheres: theoretical considerations and some measurements. , 1992, Ultrasonics.

[63]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Impact of myocardial contrast echocardiography on vascular permeability: comparison of three different contrast agents. , 2004 .

[64]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  The magnitude of radiation force on ultrasound contrast agents. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  K. Nightingale,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[66]  D. Sahn Arrhythmias in Rat Hearts Exposed to Pulsed Ultrasound After Intravenous Injection of a Contrast Agent , 2002 .

[67]  Ji Song,et al.  Stimulation of Arteriogenesis in Skeletal Muscle by Microbubble Destruction With Ultrasound , 2002, Circulation.

[68]  G. Freeman,et al.  Ultrasound-targeted antisense oligonucleotide attenuates ischemia/reperfusion-induced myocardial tumor necrosis factor-alpha. , 2003, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[69]  Peng Li,et al.  Impact of myocardial contrast echocardiography on vascular permeability: an in vivo dose response study of delivery mode, pressure amplitude and contrast dose. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[70]  X. Li,et al.  Influence of process parameters on the protein stability encapsulated in poly-DL-lactide-poly(ethylene glycol) microspheres. , 2000, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[71]  M. Prausnitz,et al.  Intracellular Drug Delivery Using Low-Frequency Ultrasound: Quantification of Molecular Uptake and Cell Viability , 2001, Pharmaceutical Research.

[72]  E. Wisner,et al.  Optical and acoustical interrogation of submicron contrast agents , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[73]  G Van Camp,et al.  Destruction of Contrast Microbubbles by Ultrasound: Effects on Myocardial Function, Coronary Perfusion Pressure, and Microvascular Integrity , 2001, Circulation.

[74]  S. D. De Smedt,et al.  Microbubbles which bind and protect DNA against nucleases. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[75]  E. Unger,et al.  Targeted-Microbubble Binding Selectively to GPIIb IIIa Receptors of Platelet Thrombi , 2002, Investigative radiology.

[76]  Hairong Zheng,et al.  Acoustically-active microbubbles conjugated to liposomes: characterization of a proposed drug delivery vehicle. , 2007, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[77]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  MRI-guided targeted blood-brain barrier disruption with focused ultrasound: histological findings in rabbits. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[78]  Y Wu,et al.  Acoustically active lipospheres containing paclitaxel: a new therapeutic ultrasound contrast agent. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[79]  S. Kaul,et al.  Quantification of Cerebral Perfusion With “Real-Time” Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound , 2001, Circulation.

[80]  S. Kaul,et al.  Vascular recruitment in skeletal muscle during exercise and hyperinsulinemia assessed by contrast ultrasound. , 2002, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[81]  F. T. ten Cate,et al.  Radionuclide tumour therapy with ultrasound contrast microbubbles. , 2004, Ultrasonics.

[82]  D. Miller,et al.  Diagnostic Ultrasound Activation of Contrast Agent Gas Bodies Induces Capillary Rupture in Mice. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[83]  R Gramiak,et al.  Echocardiography of the aortic root. , 1968, Investigative radiology.

[84]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Microvascular permeabilization and cardiomyocyte injury provoked by myocardial contrast echocardiography in a canine model. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[85]  J. Hossack,et al.  Acoustic radiation force enhances targeted delivery of ultrasound contrast microbubbles: in vitro verification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[86]  S. Kaul,et al.  Skin perfusion assessed by contrast ultrasound predicts tissue survival in a free flap model , 2002 .

[87]  Simon C Watkins,et al.  Microbubbles targeted to intercellular adhesion molecule-1 bind to activated coronary artery endothelial cells. , 1998, Circulation.

[88]  Jiri Sklenar,et al.  Imaging tumor angiogenesis with contrast ultrasound and microbubbles targeted to alpha(v)beta3. , 2003, Circulation.

[89]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Influence of contrast agent dose and ultrasound exposure on cardiomyocyte injury induced by myocardial contrast echocardiography in rats. , 2005, Radiology.

[90]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Basic Acoustic Properties of Microbubbles , 2002, Echocardiography.

[91]  D. Cumberland,et al.  Ultrasound enhances reporter gene expression after transfection of vascular cells in vitro. , 1999, Circulation.

[92]  R. Busse,et al.  Vascular Gene Transfer of Phosphomimetic Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (S1177D) Using Ultrasound-Enhanced Destruction of Plasmid-Loaded Microbubbles Improves Vasoreactivity , 2002, Circulation.

[93]  P. Roberson,et al.  Microbubble-augmented ultrasound declotting of thrombosed arteriovenous dialysis grafts in dogs. , 2003, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[94]  Raffi Bekeredjian,et al.  Efficient gene delivery to pancreatic islets with ultrasonic microbubble destruction technology. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[95]  T C Skalak,et al.  Delivery of colloidal particles and red blood cells to tissue through microvessel ruptures created by targeted microbubble destruction with ultrasound. , 1998, Circulation.

[96]  C. Visser,et al.  Transient permeabilization of cell membranes by ultrasound-exposed microbubbles is related to formation of hydrogen peroxide. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[97]  M. Wheatley,et al.  Ultrasound degradation of novel polymer contrast agents. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[98]  Nico de Jong,et al.  High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[99]  N. Jong,et al.  Ultrasound microbubble induced endothelial cell permeability. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[100]  Y. Kaneda,et al.  Fetal gene transfer by intrauterine injection with microbubble-enhanced ultrasound. , 2002, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[101]  Raffi Bekeredjian,et al.  Ultrasound-Targeted Microbubble Destruction Can Repeatedly Direct Highly Specific Plasmid Expression to the Heart , 2003, Circulation.

[102]  Daniel M. Hallow,et al.  Ultrasonically targeted delivery into endothelial and smooth muscle cells in ex vivo arteries. , 2007, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[103]  K. Tachibana,et al.  Albumin microbubble echo-contrast material as an enhancer for ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis. , 1995, Circulation.

[104]  Zhong-gao Gao,et al.  Multifunctional nanoparticles for combining ultrasonic tumor imaging and targeted chemotherapy. , 2007, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[105]  D. Miller,et al.  Gas-body-based contrast agent enhances vascular bioeffects of 1.09 MHz ultrasound on mouse intestine. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[106]  R. Siegel,et al.  Microparticle-containing oncotic solutions augment in-vitro clot disruption by ultrasound. , 2000, Thrombosis research.

[107]  D S Segar,et al.  Improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation and opacification with OPTISON (FS069), a new echocardiographic contrast agent. Results of a phase III Multicenter Trial. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[108]  Dexi Liu,et al.  Hydrodynamic gene delivery: its principles and applications. , 2007, Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy.

[109]  D. Miller,et al.  The interaction of ultrasonic heating and cavitation in vascular bioeffects on mouse intestine. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[110]  Yi Yan Yang,et al.  Effect of preparation temperature on the characteristics and release profiles of PLGA microspheres containing protein fabricated by double-emulsion solvent extraction/evaporation method. , 2000, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[111]  K W Ferrara,et al.  Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with US: imaging, Doppler, and contrast agents. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[112]  J. Pikkemaat,et al.  Preparation of monodisperse polymer particles and capsules by ink-jet printing , 2006 .

[113]  Le-ming Fan,et al.  Ultrasound-targeted microbubble destruction improves the low density lipoprotein receptor gene expression in HepG2 cells. , 2006, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[114]  Paul A Dayton,et al.  Ultrasound radiation force enables targeted deposition of model drug carriers loaded on microbubbles. , 2006, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[115]  Michael Reinhardt,et al.  Evaluation of gas-filled microparticles and sonoporation as gene delivery system: feasibility study in rodent tumor models. , 2005, Radiology.

[116]  T C Skalak,et al.  Direct In Vivo Visualization of Intravascular Destruction of Microbubbles by Ultrasound and Its Local Effects on Tissue. , 1998, Circulation.

[117]  Susannah H Bloch,et al.  Application of Ultrasound to Selectively Localize Nanodroplets for Targeted Imaging and Therapy , 2006, Molecular imaging.

[118]  A. George,et al.  Delivery of oligodeoxynucleotides into human saphenous veins and the adjunct effect of ultrasound and microbubbles. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[119]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Optical observation of lipid- and polymer-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents , 2004 .

[120]  M. Kohno,et al.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor facilitates the angiogenesis induced by ultrasonic microbubble destruction. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[121]  R V Shohet,et al.  Echocardiographic destruction of albumin microbubbles directs gene delivery to the myocardium. , 2000, Circulation.

[122]  P. Marmottant,et al.  Controlled vesicle deformation and lysis by single oscillating bubbles , 2003, Nature.

[123]  M. Stiller,et al.  Physical enhancement of dermatologic drug delivery: iontophoresis and phonophoresis. , 1996, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[124]  David Needham,et al.  Equilibrium and Dynamic Interfacial Tension Measurements at Microscopic Interfaces Using a Micropipet Technique. 2. Dynamics of Phospholipid Monolayer Formation and Equilibrium Tensions at the Water−Air Interface , 2001 .

[125]  William R Wagner,et al.  Ultrasound Imaging of Acute Cardiac Transplant Rejection With Microbubbles Targeted to Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 , 2003, Circulation.

[126]  Ryuichi Morishita,et al.  Local delivery of E2F decoy oligodeoxynucleotides using ultrasound with microbubble agent (Optison) inhibits intimal hyperplasia after balloon injury in rat carotid artery model. , 2004, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[127]  E. Picano,et al.  In vitro modulation of intracellular oxidative stress of endothelial cells by diagnostic cardiac ultrasound. , 2003, Cardiovascular research.

[128]  Y. Taniyama,et al.  Development of safe and efficient novel nonviral gene transfer using ultrasound: enhancement of transfection efficiency of naked plasmid DNA in skeletal muscle , 2002, Gene Therapy.

[129]  William R. Wagner,et al.  Modulating Targeted Adhesion of an Ultrasound Contrast Agent to Dysfunctional Endothelium , 2002, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[130]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Novel site‐specific systemic delivery of Rapamycin with perfluorobutane gas microbubble carrier reduced neointimal formation in a porcine coronary restenosis model , 2005, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[131]  Douglas L. Miller,et al.  Histological Characterization of Microlesions Induced by Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography , 2005, Echocardiography.

[132]  S. Kaul,et al.  Assessment of Endogenous and Therapeutic Arteriogenesis by Contrast Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of Integrin Expression , 2005, Circulation.

[133]  J. Isner,et al.  Direct intramuscular gene transfer of naked DNA encoding vascular endothelial growth factor augments collateral development and tissue perfusion. , 1996, Circulation.

[134]  Michael Reinhardt,et al.  Molecular targeting of lymph nodes with L-selectin ligand-specific US contrast agent: a feasibility study in mice and dogs. , 2004, Radiology.

[135]  K. Tachibana,et al.  Microbubble‐enhanced sonoporation: Efficient gene transduction technique for chick embryos , 2003, Genesis.

[136]  Junru Wu,et al.  Reparable sonoporation generated by microstreaming. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[137]  C. Molina,et al.  Timing of Recanalization After Microbubble-Enhanced Intravenous Thrombolysis in Basilar Artery Occlusion , 2007, Stroke.

[138]  M. L. La Rotonda,et al.  Influence of the co-encapsulation of different non-ionic surfactants on the properties of PLGA insulin-loaded microspheres. , 2000, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[139]  T. Marwick,et al.  What is the relationship between flow and function in diabetic cardiomyopathy? A quantitative study using contrast echo and strain rate imaging , 2004 .

[140]  Ronald A. Roy,et al.  Conventional and hypobaric activation of an ultrasound contrast agent. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[141]  T. Kodama,et al.  Spinal gene transfer using ultrasound and microbubbles. , 2007, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[142]  Junru Wu,et al.  Ultrasound-induced cell lysis and sonoporation enhanced by contrast agents. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[143]  M. Wheatley,et al.  Polymeric ultrasound contrast agents targeted to integrins: importance of process methods and surface density of ligands. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[144]  C. Porter,et al.  Targeted retroviral gene delivery using ultrasound , 2007, The journal of gene medicine.

[145]  S. Kaul,et al.  Microvascular remodeling and accelerated hyperemia blood flow restoration in arterially occluded skeletal muscle exposed to ultrasonic microbubble destruction. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[146]  Paul A. Dayton,et al.  Optical observation of contrast agent destruction , 2000 .