Location Decisions of Spin-offs from Public Research Institutions

Researchers who start their own businesses are expected to locate close to the parent organisation (i.e. universities, public research labs) in order to benefit from spillovers, thus transferring localised knowledge into the regional economy. However, empirical evidence on location patterns of public research spin-offs is rather limited and usually restricted to case studies for certain universities and regions. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the spatial distribution of new firm formations by researchers from universities and public research organisations, based on a representative data set for Germany. It shows that location patterns of public research spin-offs do not differ from other new firm formations. Proximity to the parent institution is of little significance for location decisions, whereas spin-offs are attracted by locations with a high number of potential customers and a large supply of highly qualified labour. Public research spin-offs rather contribute to an interregional than to an intraregional knowledge transfer.

[1]  Scott Shane,et al.  When do start-ups that exploit patented academic knowledge survive? , 2003 .

[2]  Elizabeth Garnsey,et al.  Do Academic Spin-Outs Differ and Does it Matter? , 2004 .

[3]  Elizabeth Garnsey,et al.  Do Academic Spin-Outs Differ and Does it Matter? , 2004 .

[4]  Scott Shane,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation , 2004 .

[5]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  The geography of opportunity: spatial heterogeneity in founding rates and the performance of biotechnology firms , 2003 .

[6]  Marie C. Thursby,et al.  Proofs and Prototypes for Sale: The Licensing of University Inventions , 2001 .

[7]  Kevin Morgan,et al.  Regional advantage: Culture and competition in Silicon Valley and route 128: AnnaLee Saxenian, (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994) 226 pp; Price [UK pound]19.95, ISBN 0 674 75339 9 , 1996 .

[8]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[9]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Spin-offs from research centers at a research university☆ , 2000 .

[10]  D. Foray,et al.  The Economics of Codification and the Diffusion of Knowledge , 1997 .

[11]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[12]  Andrés Rodríguez-Pose,et al.  The Link between Local Production Systems and Public and University Research in Italy , 2003 .

[13]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[14]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Company-Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology , 1996 .

[15]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[16]  Marian Beise.  Public research and industrial innovations , 1999, PICMET '99: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology. Proceedings Vol-1: Book of Summaries (IEEE Cat. No.99CH36310).

[17]  James D. Adams,et al.  Bounding the Effects of R&D an Investigation Using Matched Establishment-Firm Data , 1996 .

[18]  Randall W. Eberts,et al.  Universities and the Startup of New Companies: Can We Generalize from Route 128 and Silicon Valley? , 1993 .

[19]  M. Meyer.  Academic entrepreneurs or entrepreneurial academics? research–based ventures and public support mechanisms , 2003 .

[20]  D. Engel,et al.  The Mannheim Foundation Panels of the Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW) : German and English Version , 2000 .