Zipf's Law for Cities and Beyond: The Case of Denmark

Zipf's law for cities is one of the most conspicuous and robust empirical facts in the social sciences. It says that for most countries, the size distribution of cities must fit the power law: the number of cities with populations greater than "S" is inversely proportional to "S". The present paper answers three questions related to Zipf's law: (1) does the Danish case refute Zipf's law for cities?, (2) what are the implications of Zipf's law for models of local growth?, and (3) do we have a Zipf's law for firms? Based on empirical data on the 61 largest Danish cities for year 2000, the answer to (1) is NO-the Danish case is not the exception which refutes Zipf's law. The consideration of (2) then leads to an empirical test of (3). The question of the existence of Zipf's law for firms is tested on a sample of 14,541 Danish production companies (the total population for 1997 with 10 employees or more). Based on the empirical evidence, the answer to (3) is YES in the sense that the growth pattern of Danish production companies follows a clean rank-size distribution consistent with Zipf's law. Copyright 2001 The American Journal of Economics and Sociology.

[1]  M. Reder Economics: The Culture of a Controversial Science , 1999 .

[2]  Gordon Fisher,et al.  Random Processes and the Growth of Firms , 1967 .

[3]  George Kingsley Zipf,et al.  Human behavior and the principle of least effort , 1949 .

[4]  H. Simon,et al.  ON A CLASS OF SKEW DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS , 1955 .

[5]  R. Schmalensee Sunk Costs and Market Structure: A Review Article , 1992 .

[6]  1 What Is Game Theory Trying to Accomplish ? , 1985 .

[7]  Kenneth T. Rosen,et al.  The Size Distribution of Cities: An Examination of the Pareto Law and Primacy , 1980 .

[8]  Shragga Irmay,et al.  The relationship between Zipf's law and the distribution of first digits , 1997 .

[9]  H. A. Simon,et al.  Skew Distributions and the Size of Business Firms , 1977 .

[10]  P. Ribenboim,et al.  Collected Papers, Volume 1+2 , 1999 .

[11]  Steven Brakman,et al.  The Return of Zipf: Towards a Further Understanding of the Rank‐Size Distribution , 1999 .

[12]  Glenn R. Carroll,et al.  National city-size distributions , 1982 .

[13]  J B Parr,et al.  A note on the size distribution of cities over time. , 1985, Journal of urban economics.

[14]  P. Krugman Geography and Trade , 1992 .

[15]  G. Zipf,et al.  The Psycho-Biology of Language , 1936 .

[16]  John Sutton,et al.  Technology and Market Structure: Theory and History , 1998 .

[17]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Random processes and the growth of firms , 1965 .

[18]  George Hendrikse,et al.  The Theory of Industrial Organization , 1989 .

[19]  J. Sutton Technology and Market Structure , 1998 .

[20]  G. Āllport The Psycho-Biology of Language. , 1936 .

[21]  X. Gabaix Zipf's Law for Cities: An Explanation , 1999 .

[22]  P. Kooij Peripheral Cities and Their Regions in the Dutch Urban System until 1900 , 1988, The Journal of Economic History.