Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of construction and demolition (C&D) derived biomass and U.S. northeast forest residuals gasification for electricity production.

With the goal to move society toward less reliance on fossil fuels and the mitigation of climate change, there is increasing interest and investment in the bioenergy sector. However, current bioenergy growth patterns may, in the long term, only be met through an expansion of global arable land at the expense of natural ecosystems and in competition with the food sector. Increasing thermal energy recovery from solid waste reduces dependence on fossil- and biobased energy production while enhancing landfill diversion. Using inventory data from pilot processes, this work assesses the cradle-to-gate environmental burdens of plasma gasification as a route capable of transforming construction and demolition (C&D) derived biomass (CDDB) and forest residues into electricity. Results indicate that the environmental burdens associated with CDDB and forest residue gasification may be similar to conventional electricity generation. Land occupation is lowest when CDDB is used. Environmental impacts are to a large extent due to coal cogasified, coke used as gasifier bed material, and fuel oil cocombusted in the steam boiler. However, uncertainties associated with preliminary system designs may be large, particularly the heat loss associated with pilot scale data resulting in overall low efficiencies of energy conversion to electricity; a sensitivity analysis assesses these uncertainties in further detail.

[1]  H. MacLean,et al.  Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  C. Perry,et al.  Forest Resources of the United States, 2007 , 2009 .

[3]  S. Hagard England , 1995, The Knight and the Blast Furnace.

[4]  Roland W. Scholz,et al.  Assessment of Land Use Impacts on the Natural Environment. Part 1: An Analytical Framework for Pure Land Occupation and Land Use Change (8 pp) , 2007 .

[5]  V. Rich Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[6]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  Life-Cycle Impacts of Inland Northwest and Northeast/North Central Forest Resources , 2010 .

[7]  Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study , 2022 .

[8]  Dominik Röser,et al.  Sustainable use of forest biomass for energy : a synthesis with focus on the Baltic and Nordic region , 2008 .

[9]  Helmut Schütz,et al.  Auswirkungen eines verstärkten Anbaus nachwachsender Rohstoffe im globalen Maßstab , 2008 .

[10]  Keith Weitz,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of End‐of‐Life Management Options for Construction and Demolition Debris , 2013 .

[11]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Global implications of biomass and biofuel use in Germany : recent trends and future scenarios for domestic and foreign agricultural land use and resulting GHG emissions , 2009 .

[12]  Konrad Saur,et al.  Life cycle impact assessment , 1997 .

[13]  Thomas Malkow,et al.  Novel and innovative pyrolysis and gasification technologies for energy efficient and environmentally sound MSW disposal. , 2004, Waste management.

[14]  Dominik Röser,et al.  Sustainable Use of Forest Biomass for Energy , 2008 .

[15]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Waste-to-Materials: The Longterm Option , 2012 .

[16]  James E. Smith,et al.  FORCARB2: An updated version of the U.S. Forest Carbon Budget Model , 2010 .

[17]  Michael Obersteiner,et al.  Supporting Online Material for Fixing a Critical Climate Accounting Error , 2009 .

[18]  H. Herzog,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage from Fossil Fuel Use 1 , 2022 .

[19]  Keith Weitz,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment of Construction and Demolition Derived Biomass/Wood Waste Management , 2013 .

[20]  G De Feo,et al.  Energy from gasification of solid wastes. , 2003, Waste management.

[21]  J. M. Earles,et al.  Consequential life cycle assessment: a review , 2011 .

[22]  Marta Herva,et al.  Development of a methodology to assess the footprint of wastes. , 2010, Journal of hazardous materials.

[23]  P. Stolpman,et al.  Environmental Protection Agency , 2020, The Grants Register 2022.

[24]  Caroline Ducharme Technical and economic analysis of Plasma-assisted Waste-to-Energy processes , 2010 .

[25]  G. Dóka Life Cycle Inventories of Waste Treatment Services , 2003 .

[26]  Eric Johnson,et al.  Goodbye to carbon neutral: Getting biomass footprints right , 2009 .

[27]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Towards Sustainable Production and Use of Resources: Assessing Biofuels , 2009 .

[28]  Frederic P. Miller,et al.  IPCC fourth assessment report , 2009 .

[29]  G. Norris,et al.  TRACI the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts , 2002 .

[30]  Avraam Karagiannidis,et al.  Waste to energy : opportunities and challenges for developing and transition economies , 2012 .

[31]  Gary C. Young,et al.  Municipal Solid Waste to Energy Conversion Processes: Economic, Technical, and Renewable Comparisons , 2010 .

[32]  THE FOREST RESOURCES OF THE UNITED STATES. , 1896, Science.

[33]  James William Levis A Life-Cycle Analysis of Alternatives for the Management ofWaste Hot-Mix Asphalt, Commercial Food Waste, and Construction and Demolition Waste. , 2008 .

[34]  T. Ekvall A market-based approach to allocation at open-loop recycling , 2000 .

[35]  J. LaFountain Inc. , 2013, American Art.