Docking of hydrophobic ligands with interaction-based matching algorithms

MOTIVATION Matching of chemical interacting groups is a common concept for docking and fragment placement algorithms in computer-aided drug design. These algorithms have been proven to be reliable and fast if at least a certain number of hydrogen bonds or salt bridges occur. However, the algorithms typically run into problems if hydrophobic fragments or ligands should be placed. In order to dock hydrophobic fragments without significant loss of computational efficiency, we have extended the interaction model and placement algorithms in our docking tool FlexX. The concept of multi-level interactions is introduced into the algorithms for automatic selection and placement of base fragments. RESULTS With the multi-level interaction model and the corresponding algorithmic extensions, we were able to improve the overall performance of FlexX significantly. We tested the approach with a set of 200 protein-ligand complexes taken from the Brookhaven Protein Data Bank (PDB). The number of test cases which can be docked within 1.5 A RMSD from the crystal structure can be increased from 58 to 64%. The performance gain is paid for by an increase in computation time from 73 to 91 s on average per protein-ligand complex. AVAILABILITY The FlexX molecular docking software is available for UNIX platforms IRIX, Solaris and Linux. See http://cartan.gmd.de/FlexX for additional information.

[1]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[2]  J. Scott Dixon,et al.  A good ligand is hard to find: Automated docking methods , 1993 .

[3]  A. N. Jain,et al.  Hammerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. , 1996, Chemistry & biology.

[4]  Barry Robson,et al.  PRO_LIGAND: An approach to de novo molecular design. 1. Application to the design of organic molecules , 1995, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[5]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Multiple automatic base selection: Protein–ligand docking based on incremental construction without manual intervention , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[6]  S Vajda,et al.  Flexible docking and design. , 1995, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[7]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  The computer program LUDI: A new method for the de novo design of enzyme inhibitors , 1992, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[8]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Placement of medium-sized molecular fragments into active sites of proteins , 1996, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[10]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein–ligand docking , 1999, Proteins.

[11]  Wayne C. Guida,et al.  Software for structure-based drug design , 1994 .

[12]  I. Kuntz Structure-Based Strategies for Drug Design and Discovery , 1992, Science.

[13]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  LUDI: rule-based automatic design of new substituents for enzyme inhibitor leads , 1992, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[14]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  R. Glen,et al.  Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  Gerhard Klebe,et al.  A fast and efficient method to generate biologically relevant conformations , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[17]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Computational methods for biomolecular docking. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.