Conceptual design of an off-shore topside CO2 injection system

Abstract Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one of the dominant technologies to tackle the global warming issue. The transport of CO 2 for geological storage may become economically feasible by ship when the storage site location is off-shore and installment of an off-shore pipeline requires a huge capital cost. Ship transportation requires the captured CO 2 to be in liquid phase under pressurized thermodynamic conditions. The injection of liquid CO 2 into the geological reservoir involves pressurization and heating in order to maintain the safe well head operating conditions. This study presents two alternative top side injection process designs that can reduce the power requirement compared to the base case design. The base case design and alternative designs are simulated using Aspen HYSYS ® in order to decide the process design variables. The results show that the well head temperature of 5 °C should be maintained to avoid any hydrate formation in the injection well or at the well outlet, while, utilizing the minimum amount of energy for the injection. The study employed two-stage rankine cycle in order to extract the cold energy available from the liquid CO 2 before its injection into the reservoir. The alternative designs also proposed to utilize a vapor return line in order to maintain the CO 2 vessel pressure within safe limits by performing a dynamic simulation. The results show that the alternative design 1 and alternative design 2 consume almost 28% and 27.9% less power compared to that of the base case design. The specific cost per unit ton of CO 2 injected for the three designs came out to be 0.75 $, 0.69 $ and 0.69 $ respectively. Finally, a sensitivity analysis has been done in order to investigate the effect of some important variables in the study.

[1]  Rene Mikkelsen,et al.  Development of a Compact Topside Processing Plant , 2013 .

[2]  Erik Skontorp Hognes,et al.  Benchmarking of CO2 transport technologies: Part I—Onshore pipeline and shipping between two onshore areas , 2013 .

[3]  Andrea Ramírez,et al.  Investing in CO2 transport infrastructure under uncertainty : A comparison between ships and pipelines , 2015 .

[4]  Álvaro Hernández,et al.  Economic modeling of the CO2 transportation phase and its application to the Duero Basin, Spain , 2016 .

[5]  Machteld van den Broek,et al.  Cost-effective balance between CO2 vessel and pipeline transport: Part II – Design of multimodal CO2 transport: The case of the West Mediterranean region ☆ , 2015 .

[6]  Chonghun Han,et al.  Design and Operation Strategy of CO2 Terminal , 2015 .

[7]  Chonghun Han,et al.  Techno‐economic assessment of CO 2 liquefaction for ship transportation , 2014 .

[8]  J. Gross,et al.  Modeling Copolymer Systems Using the Perturbed-Chain SAFT Equation of State , 2003 .

[9]  James A. Sorensen,et al.  Operational Flexibility of CO2 Transport and Storage , 2014 .

[10]  J. D. Hemptinne,et al.  Simultaneous modeling of VLE, LLE and VLLE of CO2 and 1, 2, 3 and 4 alkanol containing mixtures using GC-PPC-SAFT EOS , 2014 .

[11]  Andrzej Witkowski,et al.  The Analysis of Pipeline Transportation Process for CO2 Captured From Reference Coal-Fired 900 MW Power Plant to Sequestration Region , 2014 .

[12]  Dong-Kyu Choi,et al.  A Feasibility Study on CO2 Marine Transport in South Korea , 2013 .

[13]  Keni Zhang,et al.  A full chain CCS demonstration project in northeast Ordos Basin, China: Operational experience and challenges , 2016 .

[14]  David Peters,et al.  Flow Assurance in the Design and Operability of a CO2 Transportation System , 2012 .

[15]  Cory S. Silva,et al.  Phase equilibria of triolein to biodiesel reactor systems , 2016 .

[16]  Espen Krogh,et al.  Liquefied CO2 Injection Modelling , 2012 .

[17]  Youngkyun Seo,et al.  Performance Analysis of Cold Energy Recovery from CO2 Injection in Ship-Based Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) , 2014 .

[18]  A. Aspelund,et al.  Ship Transport of CO2: Technical Solutions and Analysis of Costs, Energy Utilization, Exergy Efficiency and CO2 Emissions , 2006 .

[19]  Mohammed Salim,et al.  Process Design Aspects for Taking CO2 Enhanced Oil Recovery Offshore , 2012 .

[20]  Moses O. Tadé,et al.  The importance of ground temperature to a liquid carbon dioxide pipeline , 2015 .

[21]  Li Zheng,et al.  Economic evaluation of CO2 pipeline transport in China , 2012 .