Life Cycle Assessment of Sustainable Road Pavements: Carbon Footprinting and Multi-attribute Analysis

Sustainability is increasingly becoming a significant part of strategic asset management worldwide. Road agencies are providing guidelines to assess the relative sustainability of road projects. Unfortunately, environmental features of a road project are still considered as standalone evaluations, an added value. Very little has been done to integrate environmental impacts as a part of pavement management systems and other decision support tools to choose between different strategies. In this way, being awarded with a “green” certificate for a specific road project could result in the belief that recognition would correspond to the optimal strategy. Furthermore, a road project awarded with a “green” rating during the construction phase does not mean that the project results “green” if a life cycle approach is considered. Indeed, the most environmental friendly strategies may not be the ones with the highest performance. Using “greener” materials or performing recycle-related practices may lead to a lower performance over the life cycle and therefore produce an increase in maintenance needed, which could in turn result into more congestion due to work zones and higher total emissions. Therefore, construction and maintenance strategies should be analyzed according to three main parameters: cost, performance or effectiveness, and environmental impacts. The cost analysis part takes into account outflows over the service life of the pavement according to the well-known Life Cycle Cost Analysis methodology. The cheapest maintenance technique over the analysis period was expounded and sensitivity analyses to involved factors were conducted. Performance assessment was developed according to experimental on site data gathered and analyzed over several years to develop deterioration pavement models. Effectiveness of maintenance treatments is further provided and compared to the volume of traffic. In addition, environmental impacts related to maintenance and rehabilitation strategies were analyzed. Emissions were computed over the life cycle of the pavement from the manufacture of raw materials for the initial construction, placement, and maintenance phase.

[1]  Carlos E. Correa,et al.  LTPP DATA ANALYSIS: EFFECTIVENESS OF MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION OPTIONS , 2002 .

[2]  Stella Papasavva,et al.  Global warming potentials of CFC-alternatives , 1995 .

[3]  Samuel Labi,et al.  Measures of Short-Term Effectiveness of Highway Pavement Maintenance , 2003 .

[4]  Dominique Pittenger Evaluating Sustainability of Selected Airport Pavement Treatments with Life-Cycle Cost, Raw Material Consumption, and Greenroads Standards , 2011 .

[5]  Zheng Wu,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Various Rehabilitation and Preservation Treatments , 2010 .

[6]  Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Primer , 2002 .

[7]  F Giustozzi,et al.  Effectiveness of preventive maintenance treatments on road pavements , 2012 .

[8]  J. Minx,et al.  A definition of “carbon footprint” , 2010 .

[9]  Samuel Labi,et al.  Life-Cycle Evaluation of Flexible Pavement Preventive Maintenance , 2005 .

[10]  Shreenath Rao,et al.  Rational Procedures for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pavement Preservation Treatments , 2010 .

[11]  Khaled A. Abaza Deterministic Performance Prediction Model for Rehabilitation and Management of Flexible Pavement , 2004 .

[12]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[13]  Said Kenai,et al.  Performance of compacted cement-stabilised soil , 2004 .

[14]  E. Toraldo,et al.  Experimental investigation on the use of crushed concrete slabs for subbase layers in airport pavements , 2007 .

[15]  Katherine Begg,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol International Climate Policy for the 21st Century , 2001 .

[16]  James R. Stevenson,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Crack Sealing Materials and Techniques for Asphalt Pavements , 2000 .

[17]  Vincent R. Gray Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[18]  W R Hudson,et al.  LONG-TERM COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION , 1994 .

[19]  Mitja Jurgele Life cycle cost analysis in pavement design , 2013 .

[20]  A T Papagiannakis,et al.  Incorporating User Costs into Pavement Management Decisions , 2001 .

[21]  Weng Tat Chan,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization for Pavement Maintenance Programming , 2000 .

[22]  M. Crispino,et al.  An innovative rehabilitation technique for airport concrete pavements , 2007 .

[23]  Maurizio Crispino,et al.  Multi-attribute life cycle assessment of preventive maintenance treatments on road pavements for achieving environmental sustainability , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[24]  Jay Wintergreen,et al.  ISO 14064, International Standard for GHG Emissions Inventories and Verification , 2006 .

[25]  F Berry,et al.  Airport Sustainability Practices , 2008 .

[26]  John P Zaniewski,et al.  Modern Pavement Management , 1994 .

[27]  J Walls,et al.  Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design — Interim Technical Bulletin , 1998 .

[28]  Samuel Labi,et al.  The Effectiveness of Maintenance and Its Impact on Capital Expenditures , 2003 .

[29]  Kathryn A Zimmerman PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGIES TO SELECT PROJECTS AND RECOMMEND PRESERVATION TREATMENTS , 1995 .