An approach to optimise the critical sensor locations in one-dimensional novel distributive tactile surface to maximise performance

The distributive approach to tactile sensing is a novel approach. The method relies on the distributed deformation of the surface in response to the applied load to a few sensing points within the surface area. The description of the contacting load is then interpreted into meaningful descriptors typically by using a neural network or fuzzy rules. The method has been shown to interpret descriptors such as load position, load value and load width and relies on strong coupling between the sensory data retrieved. This opposes the design aims in many alternative tactile sensing systems that formulate load description from isolated discrete data detected over an array of sensing elements, or that delineate force descriptions through a structure that minimises coupling on Cartesian axes. For distributive tactile sensors, the performance can be optimised through placement of sensing points such that the obtained information is optimal. This paper examines the effect on performance of sensor location points on an experimental one-dimensional surface designed for this purpose. The algorithm interpreting load descriptors was a back-propagation neural network. The critical parameter of sensor location is optimised using the genetic algorithm (GA) and principal component analysis (PCA) approach. It is shown that when an optimised configuration is used load position can be predicted to within 5% of the full range by using as few as two sensing elements, and that performance is improved by using additional sensor points. The results of this study are a basis for selecting sensor locations to achieve high performance with planar one- and two-dimensional distributive tactile surfaces.

[1]  Matteo Campanella,et al.  Detection of incipient object slippage by skin-like sensing and neural network processing , 1998, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[2]  R. S. Fearing,et al.  Tactile Sensing Mechanisms , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[3]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  A tactile sensor based on thin-plate deformation , 1994, Robotica.

[4]  P N Brett,et al.  Computer Simulation of the Deformation of Dough-Like Materials in a Parallel Plate Gripper , 1996 .

[5]  John Kenneth Salisbury,et al.  Application of Change Detection to Dynamic Contact Sensing , 1994, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[7]  Jackson A. Nickerson,et al.  Data reduction techniques and hypothesis testing for analysis of benchmarking data , 1999 .

[8]  Pn Brett,et al.  A Sensing Technique for the Measurement of Tactile Forces in the Gripping of Dough-Like Materials , 1996 .

[9]  Theodora Kourti,et al.  Statistical Process Control of Multivariate Processes , 1994 .

[10]  Thomas Parisini,et al.  Towards the realization of an artificial tactile system: fine-form discrimination by a tensorial tactile sensor array and neural inversion algorithms , 1995, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[11]  J. B. Gomm,et al.  Diagnosis of process faults with neural networks and principal component analysis , 2000 .

[12]  Shahram Payandeh,et al.  Application of adaptive neural network to localization of objects using pressure array transducer , 1996, Robotica.

[13]  Desire L. Massart,et al.  Feature selection in principal component analysis of analytical data , 2002 .

[14]  A J Harrison,et al.  A moment-based technique for the automatic spatial alignment of plantar pressure data , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[15]  A. Spalanzani,et al.  Improving robustness of connectionist speech recognition systems by genetic algorithms , 1999, Proceedings 1999 International Conference on Information Intelligence and Systems (Cat. No.PR00446).