DELEN - A Process Model for the Systematic Development of Legitimate Digital Nudges

Digital nudging is a promising approach from behavioral economics. In decisions where individuals tend to struggle, nudges can support users of digital systems by aligning their behavior with their preferences. Despite their wide use, most digital nudges are designed to support the intended behavior from the perspective of a company while neglecting potential legal, ethical, or individual constraints or preferences. With modern technologies such as artificial intelligence or big data, these issues multiply and with the increasing effectiveness of digital nudges and use of new technologies, this has become even more critical. Thus, in this paper we follow a Design Science Research approach to develop a process model for the systematic development of legitimate nudges (DELEN). Legitimacy requires that dealings between different entities shall be fair. Unlike other models, we set normative boundaries derived from literature, expert interviews, and target group segmentation as integral elements. Target group segmentation increases nudge effectiveness and avoids unnecessary burdens for other individuals. By doing so, the DELEN process model paves the way for legitimate and effective digital nudges.

[1]  Alfred Benedikt Brendel,et al.  To Nudge or not to Nudge: Ethical Considerations of Digital nudging based on its Behavioral Economics roots , 2019, ECIS.

[2]  Mark C. Suchman Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches , 1995 .

[3]  Keonwook Kim Implementation Matters , 2020, Conceptual Digital Signal Processing with MATLAB.

[4]  A. A. Romanovsky,et al.  Standing on the shoulders of giants , 2014, Temperature.

[5]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[6]  Chong Wang,et al.  Socially Nudged: A Quasi-Experimental Study of Friends' Social Influence in Online Product Ratings , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Midas Nouwens,et al.  Dark Patterns after the GDPR: Scraping Consent Pop-ups and Demonstrating their Influence , 2020, CHI.

[8]  E. de Vet,et al.  How autonomy is understood in discussions on the ethics of nudging , 2020, Behavioural Public Policy.

[9]  Christian Meske,et al.  Ethical Guidelines for the Construction of Digital Nudges , 2020, HICSS.

[10]  R. Thaler,et al.  Choice Architecture , 2010 .

[11]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? , 2006, Journal of personality.

[12]  Randi Karlsen,et al.  Designing Dynamic and Personalized Nudges , 2020, WIMS.

[13]  Marta Indulska,et al.  Business Process Modeling: Perceived Benefits , 2009, ER.

[14]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Digital Nudging , 2016, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[15]  Karen Renaud,et al.  A Framework to Maximise the Communicative Power of Knowledge Visualisations , 2019, SAICSIT '19.

[16]  WebsterJane,et al.  Analyzing the past to prepare for the future , 2002 .

[17]  Serge Egelman,et al.  The Myth of the Average User: Improving Privacy and Security Systems through Individualization , 2015, NSPW.

[18]  Tobias Potthoff,et al.  The Dinu-Model - a Process Model for the Design of Nudges , 2017, ECIS.

[19]  Andreas Janson,et al.  The Dark Side of Privacy Nudging - An Experimental Study in the Context of a Digital Work Environment , 2021, HICSS.

[20]  J. Durlak,et al.  Implementation Matters: A Review of Research on the Influence of Implementation on Program Outcomes and the Factors Affecting Implementation , 2008, American journal of community psychology.

[21]  Torben Jan Barev,et al.  Towards an Integrative Understanding of Privacy Nudging – Systematic Review and Research Agenda , 2020 .

[22]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Digital nudging , 2018, Commun. ACM.

[23]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Online Privacy Heuristics that Predict Information Disclosure , 2020, CHI.

[24]  Christiane Lehrer,et al.  Making Digital Nudging Applicable: The Digital Nudge Design Method , 2018, ICIS.

[25]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Medicine. Do defaults save lives? , 2003, Science.

[26]  Andreas Janson,et al.  Understanding User Preferences of Digital Privacy Nudges - A Best-Worst Scaling Approach , 2020, HICSS.

[27]  Lucia A. Reisch,et al.  Green by Default , 2013 .

[28]  Jonathan Mayer,et al.  Dark Patterns at Scale , 2019, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[29]  John M. Blythe,et al.  Personality and Social Framing in Privacy Decision-Making: A Study on Cookie Acceptance , 2016, Front. Psychol..