Initial contaminant removal performance factors in horizontal flow reed beds used for treating urban wastewater.

This study evaluates the effect of hydraulic loading rate (HLR), aspect ratio, granular medium size and water depth on the removal of selected contaminants during the start up of horizontal subsurface flow reed beds (HFRBs). Experiments were carried out in a pilot-scale HFRB system comprising four pairs of lined beds of almost equal surface area (54-56 m(2) each bed), with the following aspect ratios: 1:1, 1.5:1, 2:1 and 2.5:1. The size of the granular medium of each pair varied from coarse granitic gravel ( D(60) = 10mm, C(u) = 1.6) to small granitic gravel (D(60) = 3.5 mm, C(u) = 1.7). The beds of the pair with longest aspect ratio were made shallower (0.27 m) than the rest (0.5m) The system was sampled weekly from May 2001 to January 2002. The results indicate that HLR and water depth are determining factors in the performance of the HFRBs. Beds with a water depth of 0.27 m removed more COD (70-80%), BOD(5) (70-85%), ammonia (40-50%) and dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP) (10-22%) than beds with a depth of 0.5m (60-65% for COD, 50-60% for BOD(5), 25-30% for ammonia, and 2-10% for DRP). The higher efficiency observed shallower beds was related to their less reducing conditions (average redox potential (E) ranging from -351 to -338 mV) than beds with a depth of 0.5m (-390 to -358 mV). The difference in E status between two bed types seems to lead to differences in the biochemical processes. In fact, denitrification was estimated to be a significant reaction in shallower beds.

[1]  A. Zehnder Biology of anaerobic microorganisms , 1988 .

[2]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[3]  J. Vymazal Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in the Czech Republic. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[4]  P. F. Cooper,et al.  Constructed wetlands in water pollution control. , 1990 .

[5]  P. S. Burgoon,et al.  Performance of subsurface flow wetlands with batch-load and continuous-flow conditions , 1995 .

[6]  Peter J. Fisher,et al.  HYDRAULIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS AT RICHMOND, NSW, AUSTRALIA , 1990 .

[7]  C. Tanner,et al.  Plants as ecosystem engineers in subsurface-flow treatment wetlands. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[8]  R. Netter Flow characteristics of planted soil filters , 1994 .

[9]  R. Shutes,et al.  Reed beds and constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment , 1997 .

[10]  G. Leite,et al.  Performance of two macrophyte species in experimental wetlands receiving variable loads of anaerobically treated municipal wastewater. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  K. Reddy,et al.  Vegetated Submerged Beds with Artificial Substrates. II: N and P Removal , 1991 .

[12]  Per Stålnacke,et al.  Removal Efficiency of Three Cold-Climate Constructed Wetlands Treating Domestic Wastewater: Effects of Temperature, Seasons, Loading Rates and Input Concentrations , 1999 .

[13]  Sherwood C. Reed,et al.  Natural systems for wastewater treatment , 1990 .

[14]  Gunther Geller,et al.  Horizontal subsurface flow systems in the German speaking countries: summary of long-term scientific and practical experiences; recommendations , 1997 .

[15]  Hans Brix,et al.  WASTEWATER TREATMENT IN CONSTRUCTED REED BEDS IN DENMARK — STATE OF THE ART , 1990 .

[16]  W. Mitsch Global wetlands: old world and new , 1994 .

[17]  Charles R. Goldman,et al.  Nitrogen removal in artificial wetlands , 1983 .

[18]  R. E. Lee,et al.  Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands For WasteWater Treatment A Technology Assessment , 1998 .