The mental health continuum-short form: The structure and application for cross-cultural studies-A 38 nation study.

OBJECTIVE The Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) is a brief scale measuring positive human functioning. The study aimed to examine the factor structure and to explore the cross-cultural utility of the MHC-SF using bifactor models and exploratory structural equation modelling. METHOD Using multigroup confirmatory analysis (MGCFA) we examined the measurement invariance of the MHC-SF in 38 countries (university students, N = 8,066; 61.73% women, mean age 21.55 years). RESULTS MGCFA supported the cross-cultural replicability of a bifactor structure and a metric level of invariance between student samples. The average proportion of variance explained by the general factor was high (ECV = .66), suggesting that the three aspects of mental health (emotional, social, and psychological well-being) can be treated as a single dimension of well-being. CONCLUSION The metric level of invariance offers the possibility of comparing correlates and predictors of positive mental functioning across countries; however, the comparison of the levels of mental health across countries is not possible due to lack of scalar invariance. Our study has preliminary character and could serve as an initial assessment of the structure of the MHC-SF across different cultural settings. Further studies on general populations are required for extending our findings.

[1]  Mohsen Joshanloo,et al.  The factor structure of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in Serbia: an evaluation using exploratory structural equation modeling , 2017, Journal of mental health.

[2]  Rachel M. Calogero,et al.  Measurement of Psychological Entitlement in 28 Countries , 2017 .

[3]  Yan Wang,et al.  Measurement Invariance Testing with Many Groups: A Comparison of Five Approaches , 2017 .

[4]  N. Frijda,et al.  The evolutionary emergence of what we call “emotions”‡ , 2016, Cognition & emotion.

[5]  Herbert W. Marsh,et al.  A Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Framework for the Identification of Distinct Sources of Construct-Relevant Psychometric Multidimensionality , 2016 .

[6]  G. D. Bruin,et al.  Bifactor analysis of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF). , 2015 .

[7]  Bogdan Wojciszke,et al.  Belief in a Zero-Sum Game as a Social Axiom , 2015 .

[8]  V. Jovanović.  Structural validity of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: The bifactor model of emotional, social and psychological well-being , 2015 .

[9]  C. Keyes,et al.  The Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC–SF) as a Measure of Well-Being in the Italian Context , 2015 .

[10]  E. S. Kim,et al.  A comparison of sequential and nonsequential specification searches in testing factorial invariance , 2013, Behavior Research Methods.

[11]  C. Keyes,et al.  The Polish adaptation of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form (MHC-SF) , 2014 .

[12]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research , 2014 .

[13]  E. Nosenko,et al.  ON ASSESSING EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AS A PRECURSOR OF POSITIVE PERSONALITY FUNCTIONING AND MENTAL HEALTH , 2014 .

[14]  Hally Quinn.  Bifactor Models, Explained Common Variance (ECV), and the Usefulness of Scores from Unidimensional Item Response Theory Analyses , 2014 .

[15]  Leslie Rutkowski,et al.  Assessing the Hypothesis of Measurement Invariance in the Context of Large-Scale International Surveys , 2014 .

[16]  M. Wissing,et al.  Measurement invariance of the Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC–SF) across three cultural groups , 2013 .

[17]  Richard Scheines,et al.  Multidimensionality and Structural Coefficient Bias in Structural Equation Modeling , 2013 .

[18]  S. Reise.  The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models , 2012 .

[19]  R. Veenhoven,et al.  Income inequality and happiness in 119 nations. In search for an optimum that does not appear to exist , 2010 .

[20]  C. Welzel,et al.  Agency, Values, and Well-Being: A Human Development Model , 2010, Social indicators research.

[21]  C. Keyes,et al.  Evaluation of the mental health continuum-short form (MHC-SF) in setswana-speaking South Africans. , 2008, Clinical psychology & psychotherapy.

[22]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  University of Southern Denmark Prevalence of depressive symptoms in university students from Germany , Denmark , Poland and , 2008 .

[23]  Daniel Eisenberg,et al.  Prevalence and correlates of depression, anxiety, and suicidality among university students. , 2007, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[24]  F. Chen.  Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement Invariance , 2007 .

[25]  Anne-Wil Harzing.  Response Styles in Cross-national Survey Research , 2006 .

[26]  S. West,et al.  A Comparison of Bifactor and Second-Order Models of Quality of Life , 2006, Multivariate behavioral research.

[27]  L. Laflamme,et al.  Perceived Quality of Life and Self-Rated Health among First-Year University Students , 2004 .

[28]  A. Krämer,et al.  Differences in health complaints among university students from three European countries. , 2003, Preventive medicine.

[29]  R. Cummins,et al.  Developing a National Index of Subjective Wellbeing: The Australian Unity Wellbeing Index , 2003 .

[30]  C. Keyes,et al.  The mental health continuum: from languishing to flourishing in life. , 2002, Journal of health and social behavior.

[31]  Gordon W. Cheung,et al.  Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance , 2002 .

[32]  K. Bollen,et al.  Improper Solutions in Structural Equation Models , 2001 .

[33]  Ron Roberts,et al.  Mental and physical health in students: The role of economic circumstances , 2000 .

[34]  Michael Eid,et al.  A multitrait-multimethod model with minimal assumptions , 2000 .

[35]  J. Arnett.  Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[36]  S. Cross,et al.  The relational-interdependent self-construal and relationships. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  S. Schwartz,et al.  Value priorities and subjective well‐being: direct relations and congruity effects , 2000 .

[38]  Albert Satorra,et al.  A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis , 1999 .

[39]  Corey L. M. Keyes,et al.  Social well-being. , 1998 .

[40]  C. A. Lewis,et al.  A cross-cultural analysis of religion and life satisfaction , 1998 .

[41]  T. Singelis,et al.  The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals , 1994 .

[42]  H. Marsh,et al.  Confirmatory Factor Analyses of Multitrait-Multimethod Data: A Comparison of Alternative Models , 1991 .

[43]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[44]  R. Larsen,et al.  The Satisfaction with Life Scale , 1985, Journal of personality assessment.

[45]  M. Sirgy,et al.  Consequences of Hedonic Well-Being, Life Satisfaction, and Eudaimonia , 2012 .

[46]  Masoud Nosratabadi,et al.  Levels of Mental Health Continuum and Personality Traits , 2009 .

[47]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[48]  C. Ryff.  Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. , 1989 .