Targeting TAZ-Driven Human Breast Cancer by Inhibiting a SKP2-p27 Signaling Axis

Deregulated expression of the transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (WWTR1/TAZ) is a common feature of basal-like breast cancer (BLBC). Yet, how oncogenic TAZ regulates cell-cycle progression and proliferation in breast cancer remains poorly understood, and whether TAZ is required for tumor maintenance has not been established. Here, using an integrative oncogenomic approach, TAZ-dependent cellular programs essential for tumor growth and progression were identified. Significantly, TAZ-driven tumor cells required sustained TAZ expression, given that its withdrawal impaired both genesis and maintenance of solid tumors. Moreover, temporal inhibition of TAZ diminished the metastatic burden in established macroscopic pulmonary metastases. Mechanistic investigation revealed that TAZ controls distinct gene profiles that determine cancer cell fate through cell-cycle networks, including a specific, causal role for S-phase kinase–associated protein 2 (SKP2) in mediating the neoplastic state. Together, this study elucidates the molecular events that underpin the role of TAZ in BLBC and link to SKP2, a convergent communication node for multiple cancer signaling pathways, as a key downstream effector molecule. Implications: Understanding the molecular role of TAZ and its link to SKP2, a signaling convergent point and key regulator in BLBC, represents an important step toward the identification of novel therapeutic targets for TAZ-dependent breast cancer.

[1]  R. Danesi,et al.  Phosphorylation of AKT and ERK1/2 and mutations of PIK3CA and PTEN are predictive of breast cancer cell sensitivity to everolimus in vitro , 2018, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[2]  D. Lim,et al.  Mechanical cue‐induced YAP instructs Skp2‐dependent cell cycle exit and oncogenic signaling , 2017, The EMBO journal.

[3]  Jingmei Li,et al.  Assessment of Breast Cancer Risk Factors Reveals Subtype Heterogeneity. , 2017, Cancer research.

[4]  Xianming Deng,et al.  Hippo Signaling Suppresses Cell Ploidy and Tumorigenesis through Skp2. , 2017, Cancer cell.

[5]  A. Eger,et al.  ErbB Family Signalling: A Paradigm for Oncogene Addiction and Personalized Oncology , 2017, Cancers.

[6]  Michael B. Mann,et al.  Transposon mutagenesis identifies genes that cooperate with mutant Pten in breast cancer progression , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  A. Berns,et al.  Drugging the addict: non‐oncogene addiction as a target for cancer therapy , 2016, EMBO reports.

[8]  Ju Han,et al.  Erratum: Stiffness of the microenvironment upregulates ERBB2 expression in 3D cultures of MCF10A within the range of mammographic density , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Bahram Parvin,et al.  Stiffness of the microenvironment upregulates ERBB2 expression in 3D cultures of MCF10A within the range of mammographic density , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Hyun‐Suk Lim,et al.  Skp2 Inhibitors: Novel Anticancer Strategies. , 2016, Current medicinal chemistry.

[11]  Stefano Piccolo,et al.  YAP/TAZ at the Roots of Cancer. , 2016, Cancer cell.

[12]  J. Xu,et al.  Skp2 is over-expressed in breast cancer and promotes breast cancer cell proliferation , 2016, Cell cycle.

[13]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Hippo Pathway in Organ Size Control, Tissue Homeostasis, and Cancer , 2015, Cell.

[14]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Comprehensive Molecular Portraits of Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer , 2015, Cell.

[15]  C. Vakoc,et al.  Targeting Transcription Factors in Cancer. , 2015, Trends in cancer.

[16]  Antonio Rosato,et al.  Genome-wide association between YAP/TAZ/TEAD and AP-1 at enhancers drives oncogenic growth , 2015, Nature Cell Biology.

[17]  W. Sellers,et al.  Oncogene addiction: pathways of therapeutic response, resistance, and road maps toward a cure , 2015, EMBO reports.

[18]  N. Yang,et al.  Characterization of TAZ domains important for the induction of breast cancer stem cell properties and tumorigenesis , 2015, Cell cycle.

[19]  Maxime Blijlevens,et al.  Molecular profiling and computational network analysis of TAZ-mediated mammary tumorigenesis identifies actionable therapeutic targets , 2014, Oncotarget.

[20]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Multiplatform Analysis of 12 Cancer Types Reveals Molecular Classification within and across Tissues of Origin , 2014, Cell.

[21]  Ho-June Lee,et al.  Drug resistance via feedback activation of Stat3 in oncogene-addicted cancer cells. , 2014, Cancer cell.

[22]  M. Biffoni,et al.  TAZ is required for metastatic activity and chemoresistance of breast cancer stem cells , 2014, Oncogene.

[23]  G. Halder,et al.  The two faces of Hippo: targeting the Hippo pathway for regenerative medicine and cancer treatment , 2013, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[24]  T. Klabunde,et al.  Understanding drugs and diseases by systems biology? , 2013, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[25]  A. Pobbati,et al.  Emerging roles of TEAD transcription factors and its coactivators in cancers , 2013, Cancer biology & therapy.

[26]  S. Bicciato,et al.  Role of TAZ as Mediator of Wnt Signaling , 2012, Cell.

[27]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Ploidy and large-scale genomic instability consistently identify basal-like breast carcinomas with BRCA1/2 inactivation. , 2012, Cancer research.

[28]  B. Smith,et al.  Targeting basal-like breast cancers. , 2012, Current drug targets.

[29]  F. Markowetz,et al.  The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups , 2012, Nature.

[30]  S. Bicciato,et al.  The Hippo Transducer TAZ Confers Cancer Stem Cell-Related Traits on Breast Cancer Cells , 2011, Cell.

[31]  Shu Ichihara,et al.  Basal-like and triple-negative breast cancers: a critical review with an emphasis on the implications for pathologists and oncologists , 2011, Modern Pathology.

[32]  Chia-Hsin Chan,et al.  Regulation of Skp2 Expression and Activity and Its Role in Cancer Progression , 2010, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[33]  L. Stein,et al.  A human functional protein interaction network and its application to cancer data analysis , 2010, Genome Biology.

[34]  Ji Luo,et al.  Principles of Cancer Therapy: Oncogene and Non-oncogene Addiction , 2009, Cell.

[35]  Ian O Ellis,et al.  Basal-like breast cancer: a critical review. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[36]  D. Felsher Oncogene addiction versus oncogene amnesia: perhaps more than just a bad habit? , 2008, Cancer research.

[37]  Jill P. Mesirov,et al.  GSEA-P: a desktop application for Gene Set Enrichment Analysis , 2007, Bioinform..

[38]  Wen-Lin Kuo,et al.  A collection of breast cancer cell lines for the study of functionally distinct cancer subtypes. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[39]  Ajay N. Jain,et al.  Genomic and transcriptional aberrations linked to breast cancer pathophysiologies. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[40]  D. Haber,et al.  A common signaling cascade may underlie "addiction" to the Src, BCR-ABL, and EGF receptor oncogenes. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[41]  Jayanta Debnath,et al.  Modelling glandular epithelial cancers in three-dimensional cultures , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[42]  J. Brugge,et al.  Use of Three-Dimensional Basement Membrane Cultures to Model Oncogene-Induced Changes in Mammary Epithelial Morphogenesis , 2004, Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia.

[43]  K. Hunter,et al.  Modeling metastasis in vivo. , 2004, Carcinogenesis.

[44]  Michele Pagano,et al.  Deregulated degradation of the cdk inhibitor p27 and malignant transformation. , 2003, Seminars in cancer biology.

[45]  S. Ramaswamy,et al.  Oncogenic role of the ubiquitin ligase subunit Skp2 in human breast cancer. , 2002, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[46]  M. Bissell,et al.  ErbB2, but not ErbB1, reinitiates proliferation and induces luminal repopulation in epithelial acini , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[47]  F. Beca,et al.  Intratumor Heterogeneity in Breast Cancer. , 2016, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[48]  V. Stearns Novel Biomarkers in the Continuum of Breast Cancer , 2016, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.

[49]  M. Hallett,et al.  Absolute assignment of breast cancer intrinsic molecular subtype. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[50]  Tatiana Nikolskaya,et al.  Functional analysis of OMICs data and small molecule compounds in an integrated "knowledge-based" platform. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[51]  A. Joe,et al.  Oncogene addiction. , 2008, Cancer research.

[52]  Brad T. Sherman,et al.  Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources , 2008, Nature Protocols.