Risk-Based Indexation

A capitalization-weighted index is the most common way to gain access to broad equity market performance. These portfolios are generally concentrated in a few stocks and present some lack of diversification. In order to avoid this drawback or to simply diversify market exposure, alternative indexation methods have recently prompted great interest, both from academic researchers and market practitioners. Fundamental indexation computes weights with regard to economic measures, while risk-based indexation focuses on risk and diversification criteria. This paper describes risk-based indexation methodologies, highlights potential practical issues when implemented, and illustrates these issues as it applies to the Euro Stoxx 50 universe.

[1]  R. Haugen,et al.  The efficient market inefficiency of capitalization–weighted stock portfolios , 1991 .

[2]  Richard O. Michaud,et al.  The Markowitz Optimization Enigma: Is ‘Optimized’ Optimal? , 2005 .

[3]  Jason Hsu,et al.  Fundamental Indexation , 2005 .

[4]  Edward Qian,et al.  Risk Parity Portfolios : Efficient Portfolios Through True Diversification , 2008 .

[5]  R. Green,et al.  Positively Weighted Portfolios on the Minimum-Variance Frontier , 1986 .

[6]  Richard O. Michaud The Markowitz Optimization Enigma: Is 'Optimized' Optimal? , 1989 .

[7]  Olivier Ledoit,et al.  Improved estimation of the covariance matrix of stock returns with an application to portfolio selection , 2003 .

[8]  J. Guerard Handbook of portfolio construction : contemporary applications of Markowitz techniques , 2010 .

[9]  R. Thaler,et al.  Naive Diversification Strategies in Defined Contribution Saving Plans , 2001 .

[10]  Anil K. Bera,et al.  Optimal Portfolio Diversification Using the Maximum Entropy Principle , 2008 .

[11]  Elroy Dimson,et al.  Murphy's Law and Market Anomalies , 1998 .

[12]  Simon Benninga,et al.  Shrinking the Covariance Matrix , 2007 .

[13]  Philippe Jorion Bayes-Stein Estimation for Portfolio Analysis , 1986, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[14]  Christoffer Bengtsson On Portfolio Selection : Improved Covariance Matrix Estimation for Swedish Asset Returns , 2002 .

[15]  John Hannon,et al.  Diversity-Weighted Indexing , 1998 .

[16]  Fischer Black,et al.  Beta and Return , 1993 .

[17]  O. Scaillet,et al.  False Discoveries in Mutual Fund Performance: Measuring Luck in Estimated Alphas , 2005 .

[18]  Richard C. Grinold Are Benchmark Portfolios Efficient? , 1992 .

[19]  J. Hsu,et al.  Cap-Weighted Portfolios are Sub-Optimal Portfolios , 2004 .

[20]  Victor DeMiguel,et al.  Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy? , 2009 .

[21]  Steven Thorley,et al.  Minimum-Variance Portfolios in the U.S. Equity Market , 2006 .

[22]  Jack L. Treynor Why Market-Valuation-Indifferent Indexing Works , 2005 .

[23]  E. Elton,et al.  ESTIMATING THE DEPENDENCE STRUCTURE OF SHARE PRICES —IMPLICATIONS FOR PORTFOLIO SELECTION , 1973 .

[24]  Knute H Mlott Case closed. , 2006, JEMS : a journal of emergency medical services.

[25]  Andrei Shleifer,et al.  Good News for Value Stocks: Further Evidence on Market Efficiency , 1995 .

[26]  L. Martellini Toward the Design of Better Equity Benchmarks , 2008 .

[27]  Phelim P. Boyle,et al.  The 1/n Pension Investment Puzzle , 2004 .

[28]  J. Hubbard Minimum-Variance Portfolios in the U.S. Equity Market , 2007 .

[29]  Javier Estrada Fundamental Indexation and International Diversification , 2006 .

[30]  Olivier Ledoit,et al.  Honey, I Shrunk the Sample Covariance Matrix , 2003 .

[31]  J. Bouchaud,et al.  Noise Dressing of Financial Correlation Matrices , 1998, cond-mat/9810255.

[32]  Yves Choueifaty,et al.  Toward Maximum Diversification , 2008, The Journal Of Portfolio Management.