Exploring the Potentials of ICT Tools for Human-Centric Regenerative Design

Aiming for sustainable buildings and cities is critical to achieving a future that is socially just, ecologically regenerative, culturally rich, and economically viable. However, our current concepts of sustainability often exclude the essential domains of data, information, and the knowledge relating to the relationship between buildings and people that inhabit them. Thus, the research questions at the core of this paper have been as follows: Can technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) be used to create systems that enhance relationships between buildings and inhabitants? Can social networks and natural interactions support further research relating to human-centric design tools for the built environment? The Human Observation Meta-Environment (HOME) project was developed to address this question. The ICT architecture has been tested to observe and collect human behaviour data within a sentient room at the Politecnico di Torino (IT), where the inhabitants were strategically aware of their behaviours. Methods of analysis included technologies related to the domain of AI (such as Natural Language Analysis, Computer Vision, Machine Learning and Deep Learning) that have been used in social network analysis in connection with the word ‘comfort’, and definitions resonate strongly with the realm of regenerative design. Results were used to further research the role of users that could serve as leverages to design (both spaces and related smart systems) according to actual user needs. People from very different disciplinary backgrounds interacted with the prototype in a workshop and provided stimuli for further considerations regarding the possible technological, psychological, cognitive, cultural, social, political, and aesthetical impacts of the use of these technologies inside sentient buildings. The paper enriches the discourse on how ICT data can be organised and read in a human-centric regenerative design process perspective.

[1]  Marketta Kyttä,et al.  Towards contextually sensitive urban densification: Location-based softGIS knowledge revealing perceived residential environmental quality , 2013 .

[2]  R. Hollands Will the real smart city please stand up? , 2008, The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities.

[3]  Derek Armitage,et al.  Place identity and climate change adaptation: a synthesis and framework for understanding , 2012 .

[4]  Tracy Bhamra,et al.  Design for Sustainable Behaviour: Using Products to Change Consumer Behaviour , 2011 .

[5]  P. Höppe Different aspects of assessing indoor and outdoor thermal comfort , 2002 .

[6]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Users, Technologies and Expectations of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience , 2003 .

[7]  Giulia Sonetti Di cosa parlano quando parlano di resilienza urbana , 2016 .

[8]  Gerhard P. Hancke,et al.  The Role of Advanced Sensing in Smart Cities , 2012, Sensors.

[9]  L. Whitmarsh,et al.  Social barriers to the adoption of smart homes , 2013 .

[10]  P. Devine‐Wright,et al.  Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study , 2010 .

[11]  D. Schaffner,et al.  Rethinking social psychology and intervention design: A model of energy savings and human behavior , 2017 .

[12]  Paul A. Longley,et al.  The Geotemporal Demographics of Twitter Usage , 2015 .

[13]  Angela Sanguinetti,et al.  Information, timing, and display: A design-behavior framework for improving the effectiveness of eco-feedback , 2018 .

[14]  Weiming Shen,et al.  Systems integration and collaboration in architecture, engineering, construction, and facilities management: A review , 2010, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[15]  Patrick Devine-Wright,et al.  Think global, act local? The relevance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world , 2013 .

[16]  F. Steiner Frontiers in urban ecological design and planning research , 2014 .

[17]  Naomi Klein,et al.  The Shock Doctrine: A Discussion , 2008 .

[18]  Sergio Altomonte,et al.  Human factors in the design of sustainable built environments , 2015 .

[19]  Nick Eyre,et al.  Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy , 2013 .

[20]  S Schiavon,et al.  Thermal comfort, perceived air quality, and cognitive performance when personally controlled air movement is used by tropically acclimatized persons , 2017, Indoor air.

[21]  J. C. Lam,et al.  Energy performance of building envelopes in different climate zones in China , 2008 .

[22]  Stefano Schiavon,et al.  Indoor environmental quality and occupant satisfaction in green-certified buildings , 2017, Building Research & Information.

[23]  P. Wargocki,et al.  Literature survey on how different factors influence human comfort in indoor environments , 2011 .

[24]  Charlie Wilson,et al.  Smart homes and their users: a systematic analysis and key challenges , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[25]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Natural user interfaces are not natural , 2010, INTR.

[26]  Adrian John Wilkinson,et al.  The sustainability debate , 2001 .