Conventional studies on residual stresses induced by manufacturing processes have focused on the average residual stress value over the processed surface area. However, what dictates the fatigue life of a manufactured surface is its weakest point. Thus, it is not the average value of the stress but the local extreme that is most relevant for safety considerations. Therefore, it is very important to study the variations of residual stresses over the machined surface. This paper is the continuation of the work [1] investigating the magnitude of surface residual stress scatter between the face-turned and ground samples. The objective of this research is to test the hypotheses that the scatter of surface residual stresses over the faced samples is smaller than that of the ground ones and that the scatter of surface residual stresses varies significantly among ground samples while it does not vary in a statistically significant sense among faced specimens for the given cutting conditions. In order to compare the surface residual stress variations, two sets of the specimens of Ti 6Al-4V bar are ground while the other two sets faced. The residual stresses over a small surface area (5mm × 8 mm) are measured at four locations of each machined sample using an X-ray diffraction technique. Statistical analysis of the measured residual stresses shows that the proposed hypotheses hold. Experimental data also show that a different number of grinding passes may induce a different scatter of microhardness. The possible causes and ramifications of the foregoing results are discussed. It is suggested that the variations of residual stress be included as a surface integrity parameter, joining its average value.
[1]
T. Warren Liao,et al.
Surface/subsurface damage and the fracture strength of ground ceramics
,
1996
.
[2]
S. Mittal,et al.
Optimal pre-stressing the surface of a component by superfinish hard turning for maximum fatigue life in rolling contact
,
1998
.
[3]
C. Richard Liu,et al.
An Experimental Study on Fatigue Life Variance, Residual Stress Variance, and Their Correlation of Face-Turned and Ground Ti 6Al-4V Samples
,
2002
.
[4]
J. Cohen,et al.
Residual Stress: Measurement by Diffraction and Interpretation
,
1987
.
[5]
C. O. Ruud.
Practical applications of residual stress technology : proceedings of the third international conference, 15-17 May 1991, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
,
1991
.
[6]
S. Malkin.
ASME Review of Materials Processing Literature 1973–1975: Grinding
,
1977
.
[7]
W. König,et al.
Residual Stresses — Measurement and Causes in Machining Processes
,
1982
.
[8]
G. Enderlein,et al.
Miller, I., and J. E. Freund: Probability and Statistics for Engineers. Prentice‐Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 1965. 432 S., Preis 96. s.
,
1968
.
[9]
John F. Kahles,et al.
Surface Integrity of Machined Structural Components
,
1970
.
[10]
Richard A. Johnson.
Miller & Freund's Probability and Statistics for Engineers
,
1993
.