Optimal sensor placement for damage detection of bridges subject to ship collision

Summary Ship collisions threaten the safety of bridges over navigable waterways in modern times. Postcollision damage and condition assessment is thus of significant importance for decision making on whether closure of bridge to traffic is necessary and for planning the consequent bridge strengthening or retrofitting. Online structural health monitoring systems provide a unique approach to monitor bridge responses during ship collisions and detect the structural damage. The damage information contained in the monitoring data, which is critical for damage detection, however, is largely dependent on the sensor layout. In this paper, an optimal sensor placement method targeting postcollision damage detection of bridges is proposed for selecting the optimal sensor set so that the measured data are most informative for damage detection. The sensor configuration is optimized by a multi-objective optimization algorithm, which simultaneously minimizes the information entropy index for each possible ship-bridge collision scenario. One advantage of the proposed method is that it can handle the uncertainty of ship collision position. It also guarantees a redundancy of sensors for the most informative regions and leaves a certain freedom to determine the critical elements for monitoring. The proposed method is applicable in practice to determine the sensor placement, prior to field testing, with the intention of identifying postcollision damage. The cable-stayed Ting Kau bridge in Hong Kong is employed to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

[1]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Technology developments in structural health monitoring of large-scale bridges , 2005 .

[2]  A. Rama Mohan Rao,et al.  Optimal sensor placement techniques for system identification and health monitoring of civil structures , 2008 .

[3]  D. Kammer Sensor Placement for On-Orbit Modal Identification and Correlation of Large Space Structures , 1990, 1990 American Control Conference.

[4]  D. Satpathi,et al.  Optimal transducer placement for health monitoring of long span bridge , 1997 .

[5]  Ting-Hua Yi,et al.  Sensor Placement Optimization in Structural Health Monitoring Using Niching Monkey Algorithm , 2014 .

[6]  Eric B. Flynn,et al.  A Bayesian approach to optimal sensor placement for structural health monitoring with application to active sensing , 2010 .

[7]  F. C. Hadipriono,et al.  ANALYSIS OF RECENT BRIDGE FAILURES IN THE UNITED STATES , 2003 .

[8]  Ernesto Heredia-Zavoni,et al.  Optimal instrumentation of uncertain structural systems subject to earthquake ground motions , 1998 .

[9]  Gangbing Song,et al.  An overheight vehicle–bridge collision monitoring system using piezoelectric transducers , 2007 .

[10]  S. S. Law,et al.  Optimum sensor placement for structural damage detection , 2000 .

[11]  H. F. Zhou,et al.  Modal Flexibility Analysis of Cable‐Stayed Ting Kau Bridge for Damage Identification , 2008, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[12]  Sami F. Masri,et al.  Monitoring the collision of a cargo ship with the Vincent Thomas Bridge , 2008 .

[13]  Richard G. Cobb,et al.  Sensor Placement and Structural Damage Identification from Minimal Sensor Information , 1997 .

[14]  Dilip K. Paul,et al.  ON THE OPTIMAL LOCATION OF SENSORS IN MULTI-STOREYED BUILDINGS , 2002 .

[15]  Dongsheng Li,et al.  The connection between effective independence and modal kinetic energy methods for sensor placement , 2007 .

[16]  Hong Hao,et al.  MEASUREMENT SELECTION FOR VIBRATION-BASED STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION , 2000 .

[17]  Tommy H.T. Chan,et al.  Structural damage alarming and localization of cable-supported bridges using multi-novelty indices: A feasibility study , 2015 .

[18]  Chenguang Huang,et al.  Application of model reduction technique and structural subsection technique on optimal sensor placement of truss structures , 2015 .

[19]  Keith Worden,et al.  Optimal sensor placement for fault detection , 2001 .

[20]  J. Beck,et al.  Entropy-Based Optimal Sensor Location for Structural Model Updating , 2000 .

[21]  L. Peterson,et al.  Measurement of static flexibility matrices for experiments with incomplete reciprocity , 1995 .

[22]  Daniel C. Kammer,et al.  Optimal sensor placement for modal identification using system-realization methods , 1996 .

[23]  C. Papadimitriou Pareto optimal sensor locations for structural identification , 2005 .

[24]  F. Udwadia Methodology for Optimum Sensor Locations for Parameter Identification in Dynamic Systems , 1994 .

[25]  Michele Meo,et al.  On the optimal sensor placement techniques for a bridge structure , 2005 .

[26]  Keith Worden,et al.  Impact Location and Quantification on a Composite Panel using Neural Networks and a Genetic Algorithm , 2000 .

[27]  Ahmad Beng Hong Kueh,et al.  Optimal sensor placement for mode shapes using improved simulated annealing , 2014 .

[28]  L. L. Zhang,et al.  Optimal placement of sensors for structural health monitoring using improved genetic algorithms , 2004 .

[29]  Yi-Qing Ni,et al.  Structural health monitoring of the Jiangyin Bridge: system upgrade and data analysis , 2013 .

[30]  Joel N. Morse,et al.  Reducing the size of the nondominated set: Pruning by clustering , 1980, Comput. Oper. Res..

[31]  Lucia Faravelli,et al.  Sensor placement driven by a model order reduction (MOR) reasoning , 2014 .

[32]  Kai-Yuen Wong,et al.  Instrumentation and health monitoring of cable‐supported bridges , 2004 .