The aim of Taipei Smart Medical Package is to develop a mobile, low cost and stable telehealth model. The Taipei Smart Medical Package boasted several advantages. First, it supported Linux on SoC (System on a Chip) platform from Intel running on X86 architecture, which ensured stability and saved investment on hardware and software R & D. AA battery combining industrial fanless design reduced maintenance cost. Second, the mobile terminal equipment allowed convenient installation and budget transportation. Third, cloud hosting was an economic, maintenance-saving and effective solution. The program adopted innovative case management by attaching health risk assessment report to out-of-pocket health checkup clients, as a way to enlarge client base and extend service period. In order to understand people's opinions on the Taipei Smart Medical Package, this study carried out an acceptability questionnaire survey. Those willing to pay for Taipei Smart Medical Package accounted for 20.6 % of the health center clients at the hospital, 27.9 % of the local clinic patients and 51.5% of the electronics shoppers (p<;0.001). Among those willing to pay 84.6% had private insurance; 77.9% had regular health examination (p<;0.001). More than half (55.8%) of the middle class (monthly income at USD967~2,900) were willing to pay for the package. It clearly indicated that a demand existed not only in the higher income population. Our research discovered the advantage of combining insurance and health screening. Collaboration among healthcare facilities, health examination centers and insurance companies is expected to consolidate the market while integration of health screening, ICT and consumer products generates multiple sources of income.
[1]
Mark Perry,et al.
Multimodal and ubiquitous computing systems: supporting independent-living older users
,
2004,
IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.
[2]
Seung Hee Ho,et al.
Patient satisfaction with telemedicine in home health services for the elderly
,
2001,
Int. J. Medical Informatics.
[3]
Eric Campo,et al.
A review of smart homes - Present state and future challenges
,
2008,
Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..
[4]
Dong Zhao,et al.
Predictive value for the Chinese population of the Framingham CHD risk assessment tool compared with the Chinese Multi-Provincial Cohort Study.
,
2004,
JAMA.
[5]
Y. Higashi,et al.
An unconstrained monitoring system for home rehabilitation
,
2005,
IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.
[6]
Luis G. Kun.
Telehealth and the global health network in the 21st century. From homecare to public health informatics
,
2001,
Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..
[7]
Jason Fitzpatrick,et al.
An interview with Steve Furber
,
2011,
Commun. ACM.
[8]
E. Hanson,et al.
Supporting frail older people and their family carers at home using information and communication technology: cost analysis.
,
2005,
Journal of advanced nursing.
[9]
M. Skubic,et al.
Findings from a participatory evaluation of a smart home application for older adults.
,
2008,
Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.