Complexity of the Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1 cellulosome reflects an expansion of family-related protein-protein interactions

Protein-protein interactions play a vital role in cellular processes as exemplified by assembly of the intricate multi-enzyme cellulosome complex. Cellulosomes are assembled by selective high-affinity binding of enzyme-borne dockerin modules to repeated cohesin modules of structural proteins termed scaffoldins. Recent sequencing of the fiber-degrading Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1 genome revealed a particularly elaborate cellulosome system. In total, 223 dockerin-bearing ORFs potentially involved in cellulosome assembly and a variety of multi-modular scaffoldins were identified, and the dockerins were classified into six major groups. Here, extensive screening employing three complementary medium- to high-throughput platforms was used to characterize the different cohesin-dockerin specificities. The platforms included (i) cellulose-coated microarray assay, (ii) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and (iii) in-vivo co-expression and screening in Escherichia coli. The data revealed a collection of unique cohesin-dockerin interactions and support the functional relevance of dockerin classification into groups. In contrast to observations reported previously, a dual-binding mode is involved in cellulosome cell-surface attachment, whereas single-binding interactions operate for cellulosome integration of enzymes. This sui generis cellulosome model enhances our understanding of the mechanisms governing the remarkable ability of R. flavefaciens to degrade carbohydrates in the bovine rumen and provides a basis for constructing efficient nano-machines applied to biological processes.

[1]  N. Goldenfeld,et al.  Cellulosomics, a Gene-Centric Approach to Investigating the Intraspecific Diversity and Adaptation of Ruminococcus flavefaciens within the Rumen , 2011, PloS one.

[2]  E. Shapiro,et al.  A synthetic biology approach for evaluating the functional contribution of designer cellulosome components to deconstruction of cellulosic substrates , 2013, Biotechnology for Biofuels.

[3]  Raphael Lamed,et al.  Cellulosome gene cluster analysis for gauging the diversity of the ruminal cellulolytic bacterium Ruminococcus flavefaciens. , 2008, FEMS microbiology letters.

[4]  Harry J. Gilbert,et al.  Novel Clostridium thermocellum Type I Cohesin-Dockerin Complexes Reveal a Single Binding Mode* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  O. Schueler‐Furman,et al.  Measurements of relative binding of cohesin and dockerin mutants using an advanced ELISA technique for high-affinity interactions. , 2012, Methods in enzymology.

[6]  B. White,et al.  Biomass utilization by gut microbiomes. , 2014, Annual review of microbiology.

[7]  E. Bayer,et al.  Cohesin diversity revealed by the crystal structure of the anchoring cohesin from Ruminococcus flavefaciens , 2009, Proteins.

[8]  K. Sakka,et al.  Different Binding Specificities of S-Layer Homology Modules from Clostridium thermocellum AncA, Slp1, and Slp2 , 2006, Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry.

[9]  Raphael Lamed,et al.  A Novel Cell Surface-Anchored Cellulose-Binding Protein Encoded by the sca Gene Cluster of Ruminococcus flavefaciens , 2007, Journal of bacteriology.

[10]  E. Bayer,et al.  Cohesin‐dockerin microarray: Diverse specificities between two complementary families of interacting protein modules , 2008, Proteomics.

[11]  B. White,et al.  Crystal Structure of an Uncommon Cellulosome-Related Protein Module from Ruminococcus flavefaciens That Resembles Papain-Like Cysteine Peptidases , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  Daniel B. Fried,et al.  Elaborate cellulosome architecture of Acetivibrio cellulolyticus revealed by selective screening of cohesin–dockerin interactions , 2014, PeerJ.

[13]  Raphael Lamed,et al.  Conservation and Divergence in Cellulosome Architecture between Two Strains of Ruminococcus flavefaciens , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[14]  M. Himmel,et al.  The potential of cellulases and cellulosomes for cellulosic waste management. , 2007, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[15]  E. Bayer,et al.  Cohesin–dockerin interaction in cellulosome assembly: a single Asp‐to‐Asn mutation disrupts high‐affinity cohesin–dockerin binding , 2004, FEBS letters.

[16]  Edward A Bayer,et al.  Evidence for a dual binding mode of dockerin modules to cohesins , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  O. Schneewind,et al.  Proteolytic cleavage and cell wall anchoring at the LPXTG motif of surface proteins in Gram‐positive bacteria , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[18]  P. Dhurjati,et al.  Properties conferred on Clostridium thermocellum endoglucanase CelC by grafting the duplicated segment of endoglucanase CelD. , 1993, Protein engineering.

[19]  David K. Johnson,et al.  Biomass Recalcitrance: Engineering Plants and Enzymes for Biofuels Production , 2007, Science.

[20]  H. Flint,et al.  Organisation and Variable Incidence of Genes Concerned with the Utilization of Xylans in the Rumen Cellulolytic Bacterium Ruminococcus flavefaciens , 2000 .

[21]  B. Henrissat,et al.  Rumen Cellulosomics: Divergent Fiber-Degrading Strategies Revealed by Comparative Genome-Wide Analysis of Six Ruminococcal Strains , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  D. E. Akin,et al.  Bacteria, Fungi, and Protozoa of the Rumen , 1997 .

[23]  Raphael Lamed,et al.  ScaC, an Adaptor Protein Carrying a Novel Cohesin That Expands the Dockerin-Binding Repertoire of the Ruminococcus flavefaciens 17 Cellulosome , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[24]  E. Bayer,et al.  Unconventional Mode of Attachment of the Ruminococcus flavefaciens Cellulosome to the Cell Surface , 2005, Journal of bacteriology.

[25]  Charlotte K. Williams,et al.  The Path Forward for Biofuels and Biomaterials , 2006, Science.

[26]  Raphael Lamed,et al.  Cellulosomal Scaffoldin-Like Proteins fromRuminococcus flavefaciens , 2001, Journal of bacteriology.

[27]  E. Bayer,et al.  Enzymatic profiling of cellulosomal enzymes from the human gut bacterium, Ruminococcus champanellensis, reveals a fine-tuned system for cohesin-dockerin recognition. , 2016, Environmental microbiology.

[28]  E. Bayer,et al.  The cellulosome concept as an efficient microbial strategy for the degradation of insoluble polysaccharides. , 1999, Trends in microbiology.

[29]  B. White,et al.  Polysaccharide utilization by gut bacteria: potential for new insights from genomic analysis , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[30]  M. Morrison,et al.  Extending the Cellulosome Paradigm: the Modular Clostridium thermocellum Cellulosomal Serpin PinA Is a Broad-Spectrum Inhibitor of Subtilisin-Like Proteases , 2013, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[31]  A. Travis,et al.  Abundance and Diversity of Dockerin-Containing Proteins in the Fiber-Degrading Rumen Bacterium, Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1 , 2010, PloS one.

[32]  C. Fontes,et al.  Expression, purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray analysis of CttA, a putative cellulose-binding protein from Ruminococcus flavefaciens. , 2015, Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications.

[33]  E. Bayer,et al.  Intramolecular clasp of the cellulosomal Ruminococcus flavefaciens ScaA dockerin module confers structural stability☆ , 2013, FEBS open bio.

[34]  R. Bunch,et al.  Diversity of Ruminococcus strains: a survey of genetic polymorphisms and plant digestibility , 1999 .

[35]  Klaus Schulten,et al.  Ultrastable cellulosome-adhesion complex tightens under load , 2014, Nature Communications.

[36]  G P Hazlewood,et al.  Identification of the cellulose-binding domain of the cellulosome subunit S1 from Clostridium thermocellum YS. , 1992, FEMS microbiology letters.

[37]  J. Wu,et al.  Interactions of the CelS binding ligand with various receptor domains of the Clostridium thermocellum cellulosomal scaffolding protein, CipA , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[38]  E. Bayer,et al.  Cohesin‐dockerin recognition in cellulosome assembly: Experiment versus hypothesis , 2000, Proteins.

[39]  B. White,et al.  Atypical Cohesin-Dockerin Complex Responsible for Cell Surface Attachment of Cellulosomal Components , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[40]  E. Bayer,et al.  The cellulosome--a treasure-trove for biotechnology. , 1994, Trends in biotechnology.

[41]  E. Bayer,et al.  Structural and functional characterization of a novel type‐III dockerin from Ruminococcus flavefaciens , 2013, FEBS letters.

[42]  M. Wilchek,et al.  Expression, purification, and characterization of the cellulose-binding domain of the scaffoldin subunit from the cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum , 1995, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[43]  A. Ragauskas,et al.  Recent advances in understanding the role of cellulose accessibility in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates. , 2014, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[44]  E. Bayer,et al.  Matching fusion protein systems for affinity analysis of two interacting families of proteins: the cohesin–dockerin interaction , 2005, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[45]  Arthur M Lesk,et al.  Serpins in prokaryotes. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.

[46]  E. Bayer,et al.  Crystallization and preliminary X-ray characterization of a type III cohesin-dockerin complex from the cellulosome system of Ruminococcus flavefaciens. , 2012, Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications.

[47]  Edward A Bayer,et al.  The Clostridium cellulolyticum Dockerin Displays a Dual Binding Mode for Its Cohesin Partner* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  Gregg T Beckham,et al.  Modeling the Self-assembly of the Cellulosome Enzyme Complex* , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[49]  J. Whisstock,et al.  A serpin in the cellulosome of the anaerobic fungus Piromyces sp. strain E2. , 2008, Mycological research.

[50]  E. Bayer,et al.  The functional repertoire of prokaryote cellulosomes includes the serpin superfamily of serine proteinase inhibitors , 2006, Molecular microbiology.

[51]  A. C. O'sullivan Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels , 1997, Cellulose.

[52]  O. Shoseyov,et al.  Primary sequence analysis of Clostridium cellulovorans cellulose binding protein A. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  L. Weiss,et al.  Spatial regulation of developmental signaling by a serpin. , 2003, Developmental cell.

[54]  E. Bayer,et al.  The cellulosomes: multienzyme machines for degradation of plant cell wall polysaccharides. , 2004, Annual review of microbiology.

[55]  E. Bayer,et al.  Plant Cell Wall Breakdown by Anaerobic Microorganisms from the Mammalian Digestive Tract , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Edward A Bayer,et al.  Lignocellulose conversion to biofuels: current challenges, global perspectives. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[57]  Raphael Lamed,et al.  Novel Organization and Divergent Dockerin Specificities in the Cellulosome System of Ruminococcus flavefaciens , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[58]  Charlotte Schubert,et al.  Can biofuels finally take center stage? , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[59]  Edward A. Bayer,et al.  Unraveling enzyme discrimination during cellulosome assembly independent of cohesin–dockerin affinity , 2013, The FEBS journal.

[60]  Alvaro G. Hernandez,et al.  Diversity and Strain Specificity of Plant Cell Wall Degrading Enzymes Revealed by the Draft Genome of Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1 , 2009, PloS one.

[61]  Z. Jia,et al.  Purification and crystallization of a trimodular complex comprising the type II cohesin-dockerin interaction from the cellulosome of Clostridium thermocellum. , 2005, Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology and crystallization communications.