A risk perspective suitable for resilience engineering

In recent years, resilience engineering has been given considerable attention among safety researchers and analysts. The area represents a new way of thinking about safety. Whereas conventional risk management approaches are based on hindsight knowledge, failure reporting and risk assessments calculating historical data-based probabilities, resilience engineering looks for ways to enhance the ability of organisations to be resilient in the sense that they recognise, adapt to and absorb variations, changes, disturbances, disruptions and surprises. The implications of this shift in thinking are many. We focus in this paper on the understanding of the risk concept and how risk can be assessed and treated. The traditional ways of looking at risk are not suitable for use in resilience engineering, but other risk perspectives exist. A main purpose of this paper is to draw attention to such perspectives, in particular one category of perspectives where probability is replaced by uncertainty in the definition of risk. We argue that the basic ideas of resilience engineering can be supported by such risk perspectives.

[1]  David Woods,et al.  Resilience Engineering: Concepts and Precepts , 2006 .

[2]  T. Aven,et al.  EXPRESSING AND COMMUNICATING UNCERTAINTY IN RELATION TO QUANTITATIVE RISK ANALYSIS , 2009 .

[3]  Carlos T. Formoso,et al.  An analysis of construction safety best practices from a cognitive systems engineering perspective , 2008 .

[4]  Terje Aven,et al.  Perspectives on risk in a decision-making context – Review and discussion , 2009 .

[5]  Terje Aven,et al.  On how to define, understand and describe risk , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Terje Aven,et al.  Foundations of risk analysis : a knowledge and decision-oriented perspective , 2003 .

[7]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  On the use of the hybrid causal logic method in offshore risk analysis , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[9]  Snorre Sklet,et al.  Methodology for Incorporating Human and Organizational Factors in Risk Analysis for Offshore Installations , 2006 .

[10]  Zahra Mohaghegh,et al.  Incorporating organizational factors into Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) of complex socio-technical systems: A hybrid technique formalization , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Andrew Hale,et al.  I-Risk: development of an integrated technical and management risk methodology for chemical installations , 2003 .

[12]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Barriers And Accident Prevention , 2004 .

[13]  Terje Aven,et al.  The Role of Quantitative Risk Assessments for Characterizing Risk and Uncertainty and Delineating Appropriate Risk Management Options, with Special Emphasis on Terrorism Risk , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Human and management factors in probabilistic risk analysis: the SAM approach and observations from recent applications , 1996 .

[15]  Nijs Jan Duijm,et al.  Quantifying the influence of safety management on the reliability of safety barriers. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[16]  T. Aven,et al.  On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain , 2009 .