Methodological challenges confronting researchers of wheeled mobility aids and other assistive technologies

Purpose. To identify gaps in assistive technology (AT) research and solutions, with a focus on wheeled mobility. Methods. Literature review. Results. AT researchers have identified a need to move beyond determining whether a device works well in the laboratory or is perceived favorably by users. The vital next step in AT research is to determine the effects of AT when used for day-to-day activities by typical consumers. Four challenges affect AT research on everyday mobility: the heterogeneity of the population using AT, the environments in which AT is used, and the devices themselves; the dependency of empirical research on objective data for valid causal inference; the need for detailed information to capture the interaction between the person, the device, and the environment in which it is used; and the extent to which success or failure of AT is dependent on the personal perspectives of the individual using the device. These challenges are being addressed by AT researchers through use of new measures, novel data collection methods, and by linking quantitative with qualitative data. Conclusions. AT researchers are adapting traditional research designs and analytic methods to examine that effects of AT on everyday life.

[1]  N. Shoval,et al.  Application of Tracking Technologies to the Study of Pedestrian Spatial Behavior* , 2006 .

[2]  Gert Jan Gelderblom,et al.  The Assessment of Assistive Technology Outcomes, Effects and Costs , 2002 .

[3]  K. Berg,et al.  Receiving help at home: the interplay of human and technological assistance. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[4]  E. Blinde,et al.  Enhancing the Physical and Social Self through Recreational Activity: Accounts of Individuals with Physical Disabilities , 1997 .

[5]  P Karg,et al.  A randomized control trial to evaluate pressure-reducing seat cushions for elderly wheelchair users. , 2001, Advances in skin & wound care.

[6]  Helen Hoenig,et al.  Access to health care services for the disabled elderly. , 2006, Health services research.

[7]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[8]  T Mills,et al.  Development and consumer validation of the Functional Evaluation in a Wheelchair (FEW) instrument , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  R L Kirby,et al.  WHEELCHAIR-RELATED ACCIDENTS CAUSED BY TIPS AND FALLS AMONG NONINSTITUTIONALIZED USERS OF MANUALLY PROPELLED WHEELCHAIRS IN NOVA SCOTIA , 1994, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[10]  William C. Mann,et al.  Problems with wheelchairs experienced by frail elders , 1996 .

[11]  H. Ogata,et al.  A survey of wheelchair use by paraplegic individuals in Japan. Part 2: Prevalence of pressure sores , 1997, Spinal Cord.

[12]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2000 .

[13]  I. McDowell,et al.  Measuring health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires, 3rd ed. , 2006 .

[14]  R N Robertson,et al.  Life-cycle analysis of depot versus rehabilitation manual wheelchairs. , 1996, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  Effectiveness of provision of outdoor mobility services and devices in the Netherlands , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[16]  M J Scherer,et al.  Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life. , 1996, Disability and rehabilitation.

[17]  Jennifer C Cornman,et al.  Trends in the use of assistive technology and personal care for late-life disability, 1992-2001. , 2006, The Gerontologist.

[18]  R B Stein,et al.  Improved efficiency with a wheelchair propelled by the legs using voluntary activity or electric stimulation. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  Mary M Rodgers,et al.  Upper-limb fatigue-related joint power shifts in experienced wheelchair users and nonwheelchair users. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  R L Kirby,et al.  NONFATAL WHEELCHAIR-RELATED ACCIDENTS REPORTED TO THE NATIONAL ELECTRONIC INJURY SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM , 1994, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[21]  T. Mills,et al.  Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires , 2006 .

[22]  L S Halstead Wheelchair odometer: method for quantitating patients' mobility in wheelchairs. , 1973, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  J. Jutai,et al.  Development of a scale to measure the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: lessons learned and the road ahead , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[24]  Linda Resnik,et al.  Promoting independence for wheelchair users: the role of home accommodations. , 2006, The Gerontologist.

[25]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  The wheelchair circuit: reliability of a test to assess mobility in persons with spinal cord injuries. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  S. J. Sinclair,et al.  Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Participation Measure for Post-Acute Care (PM-PAC) , 2007, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[27]  S. Simmons,et al.  Wheelchairs as Mobility Restraints: Predictors of Wheelchair Activity in Nonambulatory Nursing Home Residents , 1995, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[28]  M J Scherer,et al.  A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[29]  E. Badley,et al.  Adaptation to chronic illness and disability and its relationship to perceptions of independence and dependence. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences.

[30]  Å. Brandt,et al.  Satisfaction with rollators among community-living users: a follow-up study , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[31]  J. Russell,et al.  Trends and differential use of assistive technology devices: United States, 1994. , 1997, Advance data.

[32]  M. Boninger,et al.  Comparison of fatigue life for 3 types of manual wheelchairs. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  Helen Hoenig,et al.  Wheelchair Users Are Not Necessarily Wheelchair Bound , 2002, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[34]  S Iwarsson,et al.  Physical Housing Environment: Development of a Self-Assessment Instrument , 1999, Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie.

[35]  Stephen Haley,et al.  Development of the home and community environment (HACE) instrument. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[36]  Luigi Ferrucci,et al.  Assessing Environmentally Determined Mobility Disability: Self‐Report Versus Observed Community Mobility , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[37]  G. Whiteneck,et al.  Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[38]  J. Perry,et al.  Temporal-spatial characteristics of wheelchair propulsion. Effects of level of spinal cord injury, terrain, and propulsion rate. , 1996, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[39]  J. Dekker,et al.  Factors contributing to possession and use of walking aids among persons with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. , 2003, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[40]  R. L. Kirby,et al.  The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[41]  Halstead Ls Wheelchair odometer: method for quantitating patients' mobility in wheelchairs. , 1973 .

[42]  Christopher A. Faircloth,et al.  Embodied Fluidity and the Commitment to Movement: Constructing the Moral Self through Arthritis Narratives , 2004 .

[43]  H. Hoenig,et al.  Activity Restriction Among Wheelchair Users , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[44]  M. Morey,et al.  Using Step Activity Monitoring to Characterize Ambulatory Activity in Community‐Dwelling Older Adults , 2007, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[45]  Susanne Iwarsson,et al.  Assistive devices among very old people in five European countries , 2005, Scandinavian journal of occupational therapy.

[46]  R. L. Kirby,et al.  WHEELCHAIR SAFETY—ADVERSE REPORTS TO THE UNITED STATES FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION , 1994, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[47]  Luigi Ferrucci,et al.  Environmental Components of Mobility Disability in Community‐Living Older Persons , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[48]  M J Fuhrer,et al.  Assistive Technology Outcomes Research: Challenges Met and Yet Unmet , 2001, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[49]  C. Winstein,et al.  Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[50]  William C Mann,et al.  Variable-ratio pushrim-activated power-assist wheelchair eases wheeling over a variety of terrains for elders. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[51]  E. Blinde,et al.  Stigma Management Through Participation in Sport and Physical Activity: Experiences of Male College Students with Physical Disabilities , 1999 .

[52]  Helen Hoenig,et al.  Effect of motorized scooters on physical performance and mobility: a randomized clinical trial. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[53]  Denise Reid,et al.  Acceptance and meanings of wheelchair use in senior stroke survivors. , 2004, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[54]  B Phillips,et al.  Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. , 1993, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[55]  Helen Hoenig,et al.  A Clinical Trial of a Rehabilitation Expert Clinician Versus Usual Care for Providing Manual Wheelchairs , 2005, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[56]  Krista L Best,et al.  Wheelchair skills training for community-based manual wheelchair users: a randomized controlled trial. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[57]  Purvi Sevak,et al.  Disability Symptoms and the Price of Self-Sufficiency , 2004, Journal of aging and health.

[58]  Frank DeRuyter,et al.  Psychometric and Administrative Properties of Measures Used in Assistive Technology Device Outcomes Research , 2005, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[59]  G Smith,et al.  Home Medical Equipment Receipt in a Home Care Appropriate Population , 1999, Journal of aging and health.

[60]  Suzanne G. Leveille,et al.  Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. , 2000, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[61]  Marcel Dijkers,et al.  Environmental factors and their role in participation and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[62]  G. Whiteneck,et al.  A tale of two countries: environmental impacts on social participation after spinal cord injury , 2002, Spinal Cord.

[63]  Stephen Sprigle,et al.  Wheelchair use by veterans newly prescribed a manual wheelchair. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[64]  L. P. de Witte,et al.  Measuring effectiveness of and satisfaction with assistive devices from a user perspective: An exploration of the literature , 2004 .

[65]  G. Whiteneck,et al.  Quantifying handicap: a new measure of long-term rehabilitation outcomes. , 1992, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[66]  D Veeger,et al.  Mechanical advantage in wheelchair lever propulsion: effect on physical strain and efficiency. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[67]  Barbara A. Crane,et al.  Test-Retest Reliability, Internal Item Consistency, and Concurrent Validity of the Wheelchair Seating Discomfort Assessment Tool , 2005, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[68]  Angela Colantonio,et al.  Wheelchair Use Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Prevalence and Risk Factors in a National Sample , 2005, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement.

[69]  Aftab E. Patla,et al.  Dimensions of Mobility: Defining the Complexity and Difficulty Associated with Community Mobility , 1999 .

[70]  K. Roach,et al.  Development of the Wheelchair User's Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI) , 1995, Paraplegia.

[71]  C. Wolfson,et al.  Reliability, validity, and applicability of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0) for adults with multiple sclerosis , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[72]  E. Agree,et al.  The influence of personal care and assistive devices on the measurement of disability. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[73]  J. Rogers,et al.  Assistive technology device use in patients with rheumatic disease: a literature review. , 1992, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[74]  Rory A Cooper,et al.  A kinetic analysis of manual wheelchair propulsion during start-up on select indoor and outdoor surfaces. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[75]  Ronnie Linda Leavitt,et al.  Cross-Cultural Rehabilitation: An International Perspective , 1999 .

[76]  L. Lenert,et al.  Health Values and Prospect Theory , 1999, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[77]  Alan M Jette,et al.  Computer adaptive testing improved accuracy and precision of scores over random item selection in a physical functioning item bank. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[78]  Anthony J. Hayter,et al.  Poster 203 : Manual Wheelchair Use by Community-Dwelling and Institutionalized Veterans , 2005 .