The role of self-service technology and graduates’ perceived job performance in assessing university service quality

Purpose This paper aims to investigate how graduates’ perceptions of self-service technology and perceived job performance can be used to assess university service quality. Also, this study examines the mediating role of perceived job performance on the effect of university service quality on graduates’ satisfaction and loyalty. Design/methodology/approach A quantitative methodology was adopted where university graduates’ perceptions of self-service technology and job performance were used to assess the level of the university’s service quality. Through a cross-sectional survey, data were collected from 280 university graduates employed in Chinhoyi town, Zimbabwe, during the period between August and December 2021. Findings This study’s findings indicate that self-service technology influences university service quality which in turn impacts on graduates’ perceived job performance, satisfaction and loyalty. Graduates' perceived job performance was also found to partially mediate the effect of university service quality on satisfaction and loyalty among graduates. Research limitations/implications This study’s results are instrumental to enable university’s management in developing economies to adopt and improve self-service technologies as this enhances university service quality and graduates’ perceived job performance, satisfaction and loyalty. Originality/value This paper provides new insights, that is, the incorporation of graduates’ perceptions of self-service technology and job performance in assessing the university’s service quality. This research further clarifies the function of graduates’ perceived job performance in mediating the effect of university service quality on graduate satisfaction and loyalty. This study further adds to our understanding of tools, criteria and methods for assuring university service quality.

[1]  B. Nyagadza,et al.  The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) in the Heart of the SDG Agenda , 2022, Africa Review.

[2]  L. Chikazhe,et al.  Promotion of Perceived Service Quality Through Employee Training and Empowerment: The Mediating Role of Employee Motivation and Internal Communication , 2021, Services Marketing Quarterly.

[3]  Diego Bufquin,et al.  Service Quality Dimensions in Hotel Service Delivery Options: Comparison between Human Interaction Service and Self-Service Technology , 2021, International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration.

[4]  M. Camilleri Evaluating service quality and performance of higher education institutions: a systematic review and a post-COVID-19 outlook , 2021, International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences.

[5]  Charles Makanyeza,et al.  Understanding mediators and moderators of the effect of customer satisfaction on loyalty , 2021, Cogent Business & Management.

[6]  J. Abbas Service quality in higher education institutions: qualitative evidence from the students’ perspectives using Maslow hierarchy of needs , 2020 .

[7]  Ziguang Chen,et al.  Uncovering the impact of triadic relationships within a team on job performance: an application of balance theory in predicting feedback‐seeking behaviour , 2020 .

[8]  M. Paais,et al.  Effect of Motivation, Leadership, and Organizational Culture on Satisfaction and Employee Performance , 2020, The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business.

[9]  Syed Aziz Anwar,et al.  Quality assurance dimensions for e-learning institutions in Gulf countries , 2020, Quality Assurance in Education.

[10]  Charles Makanyeza,et al.  The effect of perceived service quality, satisfaction and loyalty on perceived job performance: perceptions of university graduates , 2020, Journal of Marketing for Higher Education.

[11]  T. L. Martínez,et al.  How loyal can a graduate ever be? The influence of motivation and employment on student loyalty , 2020 .

[12]  Maruša Hauptman Komotar,et al.  Discourses on quality and quality assurance in higher education from the perspective of global university rankings , 2020 .

[13]  D. Susilo,et al.  Influence of self-service technology (SST) service quality dimensions as a second-order factor on perceived value and customer satisfaction in a mobile banking application , 2020 .

[14]  J. Abbas,et al.  Identification of key employability attributes and evaluation of university graduates’ performance , 2019 .

[15]  B. López,et al.  Quality assurance and the classification of universities: the case of Chile , 2019 .

[16]  S. Parayitam,et al.  Antecedents of graduate student satisfaction through e-portfolio: content analysis , 2019, Education + Training.

[17]  Measuring the Effect of Service Quality and Corporate Image on Student Satisfaction and Loyalty in Higher Learning Institutes of Technical and Vocational Education and Training , 2019, International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology.

[18]  R. Perdue,et al.  Self-Service Technology Research: A bibliometric co-citation visualization analysis , 2019, International Journal of Hospitality Management.

[19]  K. Khairiah,et al.  The Effects of University Leadership Management: Efforts to Improve the Education Quality of State Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN) of Bengkulu , 2019, Jurnal Pendidikan Islam.

[20]  N. Güreş,et al.  Assessing the self-service technology usage of Y-Generation in airline services , 2018, Journal of Air Transport Management.

[21]  Souad Djelassi,et al.  How self-service technology experience evaluation affects waiting time and customer satisfaction? A moderated mediation model , 2018, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  Leonnard The Performance of SERVQUAL to Measure Service Quality in Private University. , 2018 .

[23]  Hon Keung Yau,et al.  Analyzing customer satisfaction in self-service technology adopted in airports , 2018 .

[24]  Ume Habibah,et al.  Impact of self-service technology (SST) service quality on customer loyalty and behavioral intention: The mediating role of customer satisfaction , 2018 .

[25]  V. Kumar Integrating Theory and Practice in Marketing , 2017 .

[26]  Paul G. LeMahieu,et al.  Lean for Education. , 2017 .

[27]  M. Martínez-Argüelles,et al.  Perceived Service Quality and Student Loyalty in an Online University , 2016 .

[28]  Kuldip Singh Influence of Internal Service Quality on Job Performance: A Case Study of Royal Police Department , 2016 .

[29]  Eui Jun Jeong,et al.  A Study of Online Portal Users’ Loyalty From Core Service, Additional Value-added Service and Switching Barriers Perspectives , 2015, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[30]  H. Park Univariate Analysis and Normality Test Using SAS, STATA, and SPSS , 2015 .

[31]  Marco Wolf,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling: A Practical Introduction , 2013 .

[32]  Marnis Atmojo The Influence Of Transformational Leadership On Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, And Employee Performance , 2012 .

[33]  Dan T. Dunn,et al.  Understanding how technology paradoxes affect customer satisfaction with self‐service technology: The role of performance ambiguity and trust in technology , 2008 .

[34]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective , 1994 .

[35]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research , 1985 .

[36]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[37]  R. Oliver A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions , 1980 .

[38]  Tamara Rajić,et al.  An integrative model of relationship quality in higher education setting: Evidence from Serbia , 2019, Industrija.

[39]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling , 2015 .