Factors Affecting the Use of Market Research Information: A Path Analysis

The authors evaluate several factors affecting the attention given to or “use” of specific market research information by marketing managers. They apply path analysis to test a model of research use involving 11 variables. Factors found to be especially important are organizational structure, technical quality, surprise, actionability, and researcher-manager interaction. The topic and findings of the study relate to a central activity of the marketing profession—the application of knowledge—and to the use of an important product—market research. Both the knowledge system of marketing and the behavior of managers as consumers of research products have been relatively neglected.

[1]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  Spurious Correlation: A Causal Interpretation* , 1954 .

[3]  Robert P. Abelson,et al.  Modes of resolution of belief dilemmas , 1959 .

[4]  A. R. Ilersic,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1961 .

[5]  Hubert M. Blalock,et al.  Correlated Independent Variables: The Problem of Multicollinearity , 1963 .

[6]  Cognitive Dissonance and Consumer Behavior , 1965 .

[7]  R. Hall,et al.  Organizational Size, Complexity, and Formalization , 1967 .

[8]  J. Hage,et al.  Program Change and Organizational Properties a Comparative Analysis , 1967, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Paul F. Lazarsfeld,et al.  The Uses Of Sociology , 1967 .

[10]  Hubert M. Blalock,et al.  Causal Inferences, Closed Populations, and Measures of Association , 1967, American Political Science Review.

[11]  D. Pugh,et al.  Dimensions of Organization Structure , 1968 .

[12]  M. Aiken,et al.  Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure. , 1968 .

[13]  M. Aiken,et al.  Routine Technology, Social Structure, and Organization Goals , 1969 .

[14]  R. Havelock.  Planning for innovation through dissemi-nation and utilization of knowledge , 1969 .

[15]  D. Silverman,et al.  The Structure of Organizations. , 1971 .

[16]  Gloria L. Lee,et al.  Dimensions of Organization Structure and their Context: A Replication , 1971 .

[17]  L. D. Brown.  "Research Action": Organizational Feedback, Understanding, and Change , 1972 .

[18]  J. Child.  Organization Structure and Strategies of Control: A Replication of the Aston Study , 1972 .

[19]  R. Duncan.  Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty. , 1972 .

[20]  B. Lazerwitz.  Religious Identification and Its Ethnic Correlates: A Multivariate Model , 1973 .

[21]  H. Orlans.  Contracting for knowledge , 1973 .

[22]  Beverlee B. Anderson,et al.  Metatheory and Consumer Research , 1974 .

[23]  John Seidler,et al.  On Using Informants: A Technique for Collecting Quantitative Data and Controlling Measurement Error in Organization Analysis , 1974 .

[24]  D. Campbell.  III. “Degrees of Freedom” and the Case Study , 1975 .

[25]  R. Hauser,et al.  The Decomposition of Effects in Path Analysis , 1975 .

[26]  Manfred Kochen.  Information for action : from knowledge to wisdom , 1975 .

[27]  R. Payne,et al.  Organizational structure and climate , 1976 .

[28]  Arthur J. Kover.  Careers and Noncommunication: The Case of Academic and Applied Marketing Research , 1976 .

[29]  M. Moch,et al.  Size, Centralization and Organizational Adoption of Innovations , 1977 .

[30]  Terence A. Shimp,et al.  Enhancing the Role of Marketing Research in Public Policy Decision Making , 1977 .

[31]  G. Zaltman,et al.  Strategies for Planned Change. , 1978 .

[32]  Richard H. Hall,et al.  Organizations: Structure and process , 1977 .

[33]  Wesley J. Johnston,et al.  Industrial buying behavior , 1977 .

[34]  Jac L. Goldstucker,et al.  What Techniques are Used by Marketing Researchers in Business? , 1977 .

[35]  M. DiVincenti,et al.  Strategies for Planned Change , 1978 .

[36]  B for Marketing research Departments , 1978 .

[37]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE DIMENSIONALITY OF THE CONCEPT OF INFORMATION , 1978 .

[38]  Vijay Sathe,et al.  Institutional Versus Questionnaire Measures of Organizational Structure , 1978 .

[39]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[40]  Janice M. Beyer,et al.  Implementing Change: Alcoholism Policies in Work Organizations , 1978 .

[41]  Gerald Zaltman,et al.  Knowledge Utilization as Planned Social Change , 1979 .

[42]  John G. Myers,et al.  The Effectiveness of Marketing's “R&D” for Marketing Management: An Assessment , 1979 .

[43]  James N. Danziger.  The Use of Automated Information in Local Government , 1979 .

[44]  David A. Lingwood.  Producing Usable Research , 1979 .

[45]  R Schofield,et al.  Reliable Knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science , 1979 .

[46]  T. Cook,et al.  Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings , 1979 .

[47]  Toward a theoretical model of the utilization of marketing research information for consumer product strategy decisions , 1979 .

[48]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Usable Knowledge: Social Science and Social Problem Solving , 1979 .

[49]  B. Holzner,et al.  Knowledge application: The knowledge system in society , 1979 .

[50]  Using the social sciences , 1979 .

[51]  Rohii Deshpandé.  Book Review : The Use, Nonuse, and Abuse of Social Science Knowledge , 1979 .

[52]  The marketing manager's view of Marketing research , 1979 .

[53]  Carol H. Weiss,et al.  Knowledge Creep and Decision Accretion , 1980 .

[54]  C. Weiss,et al.  TRUTH TESTS AND UTILITY TESTS: DECISION-MAKERS' FRAMES OF REFERENCE FOR SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH* , 1980 .

[55]  The Political Realization of Social Science Knowledge and Research , 1980 .

[56]  J. K. Larsen.  Review Essay : Knowledge Utilization , 1980 .

[57]  Rohit Deshpandé.  A ction and Enlightenment Functions of Research , 1981 .

[58]  The Nature of Information Utilization in Local Organizations , 1983 .

[59]  Robert E. Kelley,et al.  Theories of organizations , 1983 .