Distributed Opportunistic Interference Alignment Using Threshold-Based Beamforming in MIMO Overlay Cognitive Radio

To achieve the full multiplexing gain of a K-multiuser multiple-input-multiple-output (MIMO) overlay cognitive radio (CR) network, a distributed opportunistic interference alignment (DOIA) technique using a new beamforming algorithm, namely, threshold-based beamforming (TBF), is proposed. The MIMO overlay CR system consists of one primary user (PU) and K secondary users (SUs) where the local channel state information is available at both the transmitters and receivers of SUs. Assuming that the receiver and the transmitter of the PU have perfect knowledge of their own channel matrix, the PU uses a maximum eigenmode beamforming (MEB) scheme for its data transmission to release some of its eigenmodes for the SUs. For this virtual cooperation, the SUs align their transmitted signals to the spatial directions (SDs) associated with the unused PU's eigenmodes to ensure orthogonality between the links of the PU and the SUs. In addition, the MEB scheme overcomes the limitation of the conventional water-filling power allocation (WPA) in releasing the PU's eigenmodes for the SUs at high signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). A noniterative and distributed power-allocation strategy, namely, TBF, is proposed, in which the SUs' links with a maximum eigenvalue above a certain threshold transmit data at full power, and the rest remain silent. This protocol, along with the MEB scheme, enables the MIMO overlay CR system to enhance the throughput of the network described as the average sum rate of both the PU and SUs. The proposed DOIA-TBF protocol allows the opportunistic SUs to use the same frequency band of a preexisting PU and guarantees that no interference is imposed on the PU's performance for such a MIMO overlay CR system.

[1]  Joseph Mitola,et al.  Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal , 1999, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[2]  Jamshid Abouei,et al.  Cooperative spectrum sensing against noise uncertainty using Neyman-Pearson lemma on fuzzy hypothesis test , 2013, Appl. Soft Comput..

[3]  Ioannis Krikidis Space Alignment for Cognitive Transmission in MIMO Uplink Channels , 2010, EURASIP J. Wirel. Commun. Netw..

[5]  Patrick Mitran,et al.  Achievable rates in cognitive radio channels , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  Y. Thomas Hou,et al.  Cognitive radio communications and networks: principles and practice , 2012 .

[7]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  Interference Alignment and Degrees of Freedom of the $K$-User Interference Channel , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  Interference Alignment and Spatial Degrees of Freedom for the K User Interference Channel , 2007, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[9]  Mérouane Debbah,et al.  From Spectrum Pooling to Space Pooling: Opportunistic Interference Alignment in MIMO Cognitive Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[10]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive Dynamic Systems: The perception–action cycle , 2012 .

[11]  Audra E. Kosh,et al.  Linear Algebra and its Applications , 1992 .

[12]  Amir K. Khandani,et al.  Communication Over MIMO X Channels: Interference Alignment, Decomposition, and Performance Analysis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[13]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Cognitive Dynamic Systems: Perception-action Cycle, Radar and Radio , 2012 .

[14]  David Tse,et al.  Fundamentals of Wireless Communication , 2005 .

[15]  M. J. Gans,et al.  MIMO communications in ad hoc networks , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  Kamyar Moshksar,et al.  Randomized Resource Allocation in Decentralized Wireless Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[17]  Cong Shen,et al.  Opportunistic Spatial Orthogonalization and Its Application in Fading Cognitive Radio Networks , 2009, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[18]  Syed Ali Jafar,et al.  A Distributed Numerical Approach to Interference Alignment and Applications to Wireless Interference Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[19]  Arumugam Nallanathan,et al.  Enhancing the Capacity of Spectrum Sharing Cognitive Radio Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[20]  Joseph Lipka,et al.  A Table of Integrals , 2010 .

[21]  Amr El-Keyi,et al.  Constrained Interference Alignment and the Spatial Degrees of Freedom of MIMO Cognitive Networks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[22]  Kerstin Vogler,et al.  Table Of Integrals Series And Products , 2016 .

[23]  Feifei Gao,et al.  Optimization of Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[24]  Thomas M. Cover,et al.  Elements of Information Theory , 2005 .

[25]  Alireza Bayesteh,et al.  Virtual Cooperation for Throughput Maximization in Distributed Large-Scale Wireless Networks , 2011, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[26]  Caijun Zhong,et al.  On the Performance of Eigenvalue-Based Cooperative Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[27]  Jamshid Abouei,et al.  Fuzzy likelihood ratio test for cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio , 2013, Signal Process..

[28]  Yuan Yuan He,et al.  Throughput Maximization in Cognitive Radio Under Peak Interference Constraints With Limited Feedback , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[29]  Alireza Bayesteh,et al.  On the Delay-Throughput Tradeoff in Distributed Wireless Networks , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[30]  Amir K. Khandani,et al.  Broadcast in MIMO Systems Based on a Generalized QR Decomposition: Signaling and Performance Analysis , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.