Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA-GMO-BE-2011-98) for the placing on the market of herbicide-tolerant genetically modified soybean FG72 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Bayer CropScience

This scientific opinion is an evaluation of a risk assessment for the genetically modified herbicide tolerant soybean A5547-127 for food and feed uses, import and processing. Soybean A5547-127 was developed through particle bombardment. It contains a single insertion site consisting of a copy of the intact pat expression cassette, encoding the PAT protein that confers tolerance to glufosinateammonium containing herbicides. Other inserted sequences include two truncated parts of the betalactamase (bla) gene from the transformation vector on each side of the pat expression cassette. The stability of the inserted DNA was confirmed over multiple generations. The results of the bioinformatic analyses of the insert and the flanking regions, and the levels of newly expressed protein did not raise a safety concern. The comparative analysis of compositional, phenotypic and agronomic characteristics indicated that soybean A5547-127 is not different from its conventional counterpart (A5547), except for the newly expressed protein (PAT). The safety assessment of the PAT protein and the soybean A5547-127 identified no concerns regarding potential toxicity and allergenicity. A feeding study on broiler chickens confirmed that seeds of soybean A5547-127 are as nutritional as seeds of the conventional counterpart. There are no indications of an increased likelihood of establishment and spread of feral soybean plants, except in the presence of the glufosinate-ammonium containing herbicides. The risk caused by a possible transfer of the recombinant gene from soybean A5547-127 to environmental micro-organisms is regarded to be negligible due to the lack of any advantage that would be conferred in the context of its intended uses. The potential interactions of the GM plant with target organisms, non-target organisms and the abiotic environment and biogeochemical cycles were not considered an issue by the EFSA GMO Panel. The monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of soybean A5547-127. The EFSA GMO Panel considers that the information available for soybean A5547-127 addresses the scientific comments raised by the Member States and that the soybean A5547-127, as described in this application, is as safe as its conventional counterpart with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment in the context of its intended uses.

[1]  J. Gressel,et al.  Crop ferality and volunteerism , 2005 .

[2]  T. Harris,et al.  Yeilds and Cross-pollination of Soybeans As Affected by Honey Bees and Alfalfa Leafcutting Bees , 1978 .

[3]  Sangkyu Park,et al.  Monitoring the occurrence of genetically modified soybean and maize around cultivated fields and at a grain receiving port in Korea , 2006, Journal of Plant Biology.

[4]  J. Gressel,et al.  Multidirectional gene flow among wild, weedy, and cultivated soybeans. , 2005 .

[5]  G. Gumisiriza Factors that influence outcrossing in soybean , 1978 .

[6]  T. Sakurai,et al.  Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean , 2010, Nature.

[7]  H. Yamaguchi,et al.  Natural hybridization in wild soybean (Glycine max ssp. soja) by pollen flow from cultivated soybean (Glycine max ssp. max) in a designed population , 2002 .

[8]  Wilfried Wackernagel,et al.  Double illegitimate recombination events integrate DNA segments through two different mechanisms during natural transformation of Acinetobacter baylyi , 2008, Molecular microbiology.

[9]  H. Horner,et al.  Insect-mediated seed-set evaluation of 21 soybean lines segregating for male sterility at 10 different loci , 2006, Euphytica.

[10]  C. E. Caviness,et al.  Natural Cross‐Pollination of Twelve Soybean Cultivars in Arkansas , 1994 .

[11]  Antoine Messéan,et al.  Guidance on the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) ofgenetically modified plants , 2011 .

[12]  Muthukumar V. Bagavathiannan,et al.  Crop ferality: Implications for novel trait confinement , 2008 .

[13]  Efsa Publication,et al.  EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO); Draft Scientific Opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants and microorganisms and derived food and feed , 2010 .

[14]  B. Tinland,et al.  General Surveillance: Roles and Responsibilities The Industry View , 2007, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[15]  Efsa Publication,et al.  Scientific Opinion on Statistical considerations for the safety evaluation of GMOs: EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) , 2010 .

[16]  Jack T. Trevors,et al.  Detection of transgenic cp4 epsps genes in the soil food web , 2009, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[17]  Kazuhito Matsuo,et al.  Gene flow from GM glyphosate-tolerant to conventional soybeans under field conditions in Japan. , 2006, Environmental biosafety research.

[18]  M. Owen,et al.  Maize and soybeans - controllable volunteerism without ferality? , 2005 .

[19]  Kazuhito Matsuo,et al.  Flowering phenologies and natural hybridization of genetically modified and wild soybeans under field conditions , 2009 .

[20]  J. Sweet,et al.  Introgression from Genetically Modified Plants into Wild Relatives , 2004 .

[21]  B. van Ravenzwaay,et al.  Health and nutritional status of Wistar rats following subchronic exposure to CV127 soybeans. , 2012, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[22]  C. E. Caviness Estimates of Natural Crosspollination in Jackson Soybeans in Arkansas1 , 1966 .

[23]  A. Kaga,et al.  Hybridization between GM soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) and wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. et Zucc.) under field conditions in Japan. , 2010, Environmental Biosafety Research.

[24]  K. Mikami,et al.  Membrane fluidity and the perception of environmental signals in cyanobacteria and plants. , 2003, Progress in lipid research.

[25]  H. Kuiper,et al.  Scientific Opinion on the assessment of allergenicity of GM plants andmicroorganisms and derived food and feed , 2010 .

[26]  E. Rech,et al.  Gene flow from transgenic to nontransgenic soybean plants in the Cerrado region of Brazil. , 2007, Genetics and molecular research : GMR.

[27]  B. Tinland,et al.  General Surveillance for Import and Processing: the EuropaBio approach , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[28]  J. Shannon,et al.  Honey Bee Pollination Increases Soybean Yields in the Mississippi Delta Region of Arkansas and Missouri , 1978 .

[29]  T. Hymowitz,et al.  The Genomes of the Glycine , 2010 .

[30]  C. R. Weber,et al.  Natural Hybridization With and Without Ionizing Radiation in Soybeans 1 , 1961 .

[31]  Y. Yoshimura Wind tunnel and field assessment of pollen dispersal in Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] , 2010, Journal of plant research.

[32]  J. Abe,et al.  Introgression between wild and cultivated soybeans of Japan revealed by RFLP analysis for chloroplast DNAs , 1999, Economic Botany.

[33]  D. Rouquié,et al.  Investigation of endogenous soybean food allergens by using a 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis approach. , 2010, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[34]  H. Horner,et al.  Seed-set evaluation of four male-sterile, female-fertile soybean lines using alfalfa leafcutting bees and honey bees as pollinators , 2008, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[35]  Hwan-Mook Kim,et al.  Monitoring the occurrence of genetically modified soybean and maize in cultivated fields and along the transportation routes of the Incheon Port in South Korea , 2009 .

[36]  Robert L. Paris,et al.  Soybean natural cross-pollination rates under field conditions. , 2003, Environmental biosafety research.