The utility of pelvic coil SNR testing in the quality assurance of a clinical MRgFUS system

During MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) treatments of uterine fibroids using ExAblate 2000, tissue ablations are delivered by a FUS transducer while MR imaging is performed with a pelvic receiver coil. The consistency of the pelvic coil performance is crucial for reliable MR temperature measurements as well as detailed anatomic imaging in patients. Test sonications in a gel phantom combined with MR thermometry are used to test the performance of the FUS transducer prior to each treatment. As we show, however, these tests do not adequately evaluate receiver coil performance prior to clinical use. This could become a problem since the posterior part of the coil is frequently moved and can malfunction. The aim of this work is to demonstrate the utility of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) as a reliable indicator of pelvic coil performance. Slight modification of the vendor-provided coil support was accomplished to assure reproducible coil positioning. The SNR was measured in a gel phantom using axial acquisitions from the 3D-localizer scan. MR temperature and SNR measurements were obtained using a degraded receiver coil (with posterior element removed) and a known faulty coil, and compared to those obtained with a fully functioning coil. While the MR temperature-based tests were insensitive to change in pelvic coil performance, (degraded, p = 0.24; faulty, p = 0.28), the SNR tests were highly sensitive to coil performance, (degraded, p < 0.001; faulty, p < 0.001). Additional clinical data illustrate the utility of SNR testing of the receiver coil. These tests require minimal (or possibly no) additional scan time and have proven to be effective in our clinical practice.

[1]  H. Gudbjartsson,et al.  The rician distribution of noisy mri data , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  Jean-François Geschwind,et al.  MRI guidance of focused ultrasound therapy of uterine fibroids: early results. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Krzysztof R. Gorny,et al.  A Clinical Review of Focused Ultrasound Ablation With Magnetic Resonance Guidance: An Option for Treating Uterine Fibroids , 2008, Ultrasound quarterly.

[4]  Elizabeth A Stewart,et al.  Clinical outcomes of focused ultrasound surgery for the treatment of uterine fibroids. , 2006, Fertility and sterility.

[5]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Quality assurance and system stability of a clinical MRI-guided focused ultrasound system: four-year experience. , 2006, Medical physics.

[6]  W. G. Schneider,et al.  Proton Magnetic Resonance Chemical Shift of Free (Gaseous) and Associated (Liquid) Hydride Molecules , 1958 .

[7]  Joel P Felmlee,et al.  Noninvasive treatment of uterine fibroids: early Mayo Clinic experience with magnetic resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound. , 2006, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[8]  F A Jolesz,et al.  Focused US system for MR imaging-guided tumor ablation. , 1995, Radiology.

[9]  J P Felmlee,et al.  MR guided focused ultrasound: technical acceptance measures for a clinical system , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Matthias David,et al.  Focused ultrasound treatment of uterine fibroid tumors: safety and feasibility of a noninvasive thermoablative technique. , 2003, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[11]  J. Hindman,et al.  Proton Resonance Shift of Water in the Gas and Liquid States , 1966 .

[12]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of uterine leiomyomas: a feasibility study. , 2003, Radiology.