EMPIRICAL RESULTS ON DETERMINANTS OF ACCEPTANCE AND EMOTION ATTRIBUTION IN CONFRONTATION WITH A ROBOT RABBIT
暂无分享,去创建一个
Nicole C. Krämer | Sabrina C. Eimler | Astrid M. Rosenthal-von der Pütten | N. Krämer | A. V. D. Pütten | S. Eimler
[1] K. M. Lee,et al. Can robots manifest personality? : An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction , 2006 .
[2] Ning Wang,et al. Creating Rapport with Virtual Agents , 2007, IVA.
[3] Lauralee Alben,et al. Quality of experience: defining the criteria for effective interaction design , 1996, INTR.
[4] Takanori Shibata,et al. Living With Seal Robots—Its Sociopsychological and Physiological Influences on the Elderly at a Care House , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.
[5] Stefan Kopp,et al. Modeling Embodied Feedback with Virtual Humans , 2006, ZiF Workshop.
[6] Susan R. Fussell,et al. Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot , 2007, 2007 2nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).
[7] M. Bradley,et al. Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. , 1994, Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry.
[8] M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al. Positive psychology. An introduction. , 2000, The American psychologist.
[9] J. Bailenson,et al. Digital Chameleons , 2005, Psychological science.
[10] Fred D. Davis. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..
[11] David Matsumoto,et al. 学術講演会 Emotion and Intercultural Communication , 2005 .
[12] William W. Gaver,et al. Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals , 2000, CHI.
[13] Charles R. Crowell,et al. Robot social presence and gender: Do females view robots differently than males? , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).
[14] Peter M. Gollwitzer,et al. Symbolic self-completion , 1982 .
[15] Marc Hassenzahl,et al. The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[16] Batya Friedman,et al. Robots as dogs?: children's interactions with the robotic dog AIBO and a live australian shepherd , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.
[17] D. Watson,et al. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[18] M. Csíkszentmihályi. Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .
[19] S. Duncan,et al. Some Signals and Rules for Taking Speaking Turns in Conversations , 1972 .
[20] Stefan Kopp,et al. Keep smiling: An embodied agents impact on users evaluation and smiling behavior , 2008 .
[21] J. Burgoon,et al. Nonverbal Communication , 2018, Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science.
[22] Batya Friedman,et al. Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children , 2004, CHI EA '04.
[23] Henrik I. Christensen,et al. "My Roomba Is Rambo": Intimate Home Appliances , 2007, UbiComp.
[24] Soumaya Ben Allouch,et al. Acceptance and use of a zoomorphic robot in a domestic setting , 2010 .
[25] Manfred Tscheligi,et al. Addressing User Experience and Societal Impact in a User Study with a Humanoid Robot , 2009 .
[26] Cynthia Breazeal,et al. Robot in Society: Friend or Appliance? , 1999 .
[27] P. Ekman,et al. The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding , 1969 .
[28] Jodi Forlizzi,et al. Service robots in the domestic environment: a study of the roomba vacuum in the home , 2006, HRI '06.
[29] Marc Hassenzahl,et al. The Effect of Perceived Hedonic Quality on Product Appealingness , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..
[30] Astrid M. von der Pütten,et al. Der Aufbau sozialer Beziehungen mit einem Roboter. Eine Beobachtungsstudie im Feld , 2010 .
[31] P. Lang. Behavioral treatment and bio-behavioral assessment: computer applications , 1980 .
[32] Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al. A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..
[33] Cory D. Kidd,et al. A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..
[34] John Zimmerman,et al. User experience over time: an initial framework , 2009, CHI.
[35] Futoshi Naya,et al. Evaluation of Communication with Robot and Agent: Are Robots Better Social Actors than Agents? , 2001, IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction.
[36] Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al. What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.
[37] Takanori Shibata,et al. Robot therapy in a care house - its sociopsychological and physiological effects on the residents , 2006, Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006..
[38] P. Jordan. Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors , 2000 .
[39] David Matsumoto,et al. CULTURE AND NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR , 2006 .
[40] Fred D. Davis,et al. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .
[41] N. Tractinsky,et al. What is beautiful is usable , 2000, Interact. Comput..
[42] John C. McCarthy,et al. Aesthetics and experience-centered design , 2008, TCHI.
[43] Marc Hassenzahl,et al. MARC HASSENZAHL CHAPTER 3 The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship Between User and Product , 2003 .
[44] Ben J. A. Kröse,et al. Enjoyment, intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).
[45] Boris E. R. de Ruyter,et al. Assessing the effects of building social intelligence in a robotic interface for the home , 2005, Interact. Comput..
[46] Batya Friedman,et al. Hardware companions?: what online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship , 2003, CHI '03.
[47] R. Bhagat. Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .
[48] Michael Burmester,et al. Usability ist nicht alles Wege zu attraktiven Produkten (Beyond Usability Appeal of interactive Products) , 2002, i-com.
[49] P. Jordan. Human factors for pleasure in product use. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.
[50] Stefan Kopp,et al. Comparing Emotional vs. Envelope Feedback for ECAs , 2008, IVA.
[51] Patrick Olivier,et al. Digital technologies and the emotional family , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[52] Fernando Poyatos,et al. LANGUAGE AND NONVERBAL SYSTEMS IN THE STRUCTURE OF FACE-TO-FACE INTERACTION , 1983 .
[53] Clifford Nass,et al. The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .
[54] L. Cronbach. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .
[55] M. Argyle,et al. The Communication of Inferior and Superior Attitudes by Verbal and Non‐verbal Signals* , 1970 .
[56] A. Mehrabian,et al. Decoding of inconsistent communications. , 1967, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[57] Deborah A. Prentice,et al. Psychological Correspondence of Possessions, Attitudes, and Values , 1987 .
[58] Kristinn R. Thórisson,et al. The Power of a Nod and a Glance: Envelope Vs. Emotional Feedback in Animated Conversational Agents , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..
[59] William B. Gudykunst,et al. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations [2nd edition]: Geert Hofstede , 2005 .
[60] J. P. Foley,et al. Gesture and Environment , 1942 .
[61] Caroline Hummels,et al. Let's Make Things Engaging , 2005, Funology.
[62] M. Slater,et al. An experiment on fear of public speaking in virtual reality. , 2001, Studies in Health Technology and Informatics.
[63] Victor Kaptelinin,et al. Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design , 2006, First Monday.
[64] G. Hofstede,et al. Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .