Disentangling natural and anthropogenic effects on benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in western US streams

Stream macroinvertebrate assemblages are shaped by natural and human‐related factors that operate through complex hierarchical pathways. Quantifying these relationships can provide additional insights into stream ecological assessment. We applied a structural equation modeling framework to evaluate hypothesized pathways by which watershed, riparian, and in‐stream factors affect benthic macroinvertebrate condition in the Western Mountains (WMT) and Xeric (XER) ecoregions in the United States. We developed a conceptual model grounded in theory, empirical evidence, and expert opinion to evaluate the following hypotheses: (1) macroinvertebrate assemblages are primarily driven by proximal, in‐stream factors (e.g., water quality and physical habitat); (2) anthropogenic land uses affect macroinvertebrates indirectly by altering in‐stream characteristics; and (3) riparian vegetation cover attenuates land use effects. We tested our model separately on three measures of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblage condition: ratio of observed‐to‐expected taxonomic richness (O/E); a multimetric index (MMI); and richness of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera taxa (EPT). In the WMT, site‐level riparian cover, in‐stream physical habitat (relative bed stability), and water chemistry (total nitrogen) were the top three predictors of macroinvertebrate assemblages, each having over two times the magnitude of effect on macroinvertebrates compared with watershed‐level predictors. In the arid XER, annual precipitation and stream flow characteristics were top predictors of macroinvertebrate assemblages and had similar magnitudes of effect as in‐stream water chemistry. Path analyses revealed that land use activities in the watershed and at the stream site degraded macroinvertebrate assemblages indirectly by altering relative bed stability, water quality, and riparian cover/complexity. Increased riparian cover was associated with greater macroinvertebrate condition by reducing land use impacts on stream flow, streambed substrate, and water quality, but the pathways differed among ecoregions. In the WMT, site‐level riparian cover affected macroinvertebrate assemblages partly through indirect pathways associated with greater streambed stability and reduced total nitrogen concentrations. In contrast, in the XER, watershed‐level riparian cover affected macroinvertebrate assemblages through greater specific stream power. Identifying the relative effects of and pathways by which natural and anthropogenic factors affect macroinvertebrates can serve as a framework for prioritizing management and conservation efforts.

[1]  R. Hughes,et al.  Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and Rivers, part 2: A quantitative assessment of habitat condition , 2022, Ecological indicators.

[2]  R. Hughes,et al.  Physical habitat in conterminous US streams and rivers, Part 1: Geoclimatic controls and anthropogenic alteration , 2022, Ecological indicators.

[3]  A. Pollard,et al.  Natural and anthropogenic controls on lake water‐level decline and evaporation‐to‐inflow ratio in the conterminous United States , 2022, Limnology and oceanography.

[4]  N. Lamouroux,et al.  Riverscape approaches in practice: perspectives and applications , 2021, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[5]  D. Hering,et al.  Woody riparian buffers have indirect effects on macroinvertebrate assemblages of French rivers, but land use effects are much stronger , 2021, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[6]  D. Hering,et al.  A metric-based analysis on the effects of riparian and catchment land-use on macroinvertebrates. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[7]  R. Hughes,et al.  Agricultural Effects on Streams and Rivers: A Western USA Focus , 2021, Water.

[8]  R. Miltner.  Assessing the Impacts of Chloride and Sulfate Ions on Macroinvertebrate Communities in Ohio Streams , 2021, Water.

[9]  D. Steinke,et al.  Riparian forests can mitigate warming and ecological degradation of agricultural headwater streams , 2021 .

[10]  H. Wagner,et al.  Interactive persistent effects of past land‐cover and its trajectory on tropical freshwater biodiversity , 2020 .

[11]  R. Helliwell,et al.  Managing riparian buffer strips to optimise ecosystem services: A review , 2020 .

[12]  David F. Feldon,et al.  “How Well Does Your Structural Equation Model Fit Your Data?”: Is Marcoulides and Yuan’s Equivalence Test the Answer? , 2020, CBE life sciences education.

[13]  Dick de Zwart,et al.  Impacts of multiple stressors on freshwater biota across spatial scales and ecosystems , 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[14]  R. Hughes,et al.  The Relation of Lotic Fish and Benthic Macroinvertebrate Condition Indices to Environmental Factors Across the Conterminous USA. , 2020, Ecological indicators.

[15]  D. Argent,et al.  Impacts of point-source Net Alkaline Mine Drainage (NAMD) on stream macroinvertebrate communities. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  J. Grace,et al.  The importance of natural versus human factors for ecological conditions of streams and rivers. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[17]  J. E. Janisch,et al.  The first statewide stream macroinvertebrate bioassessment in Washington State with a relative risk and attributable risk analysis for multiple stressors , 2019, Ecological Indicators.

[18]  Daniel J. McGarvey,et al.  Precipitation and temperature drive continental-scale patterns in stream invertebrate production , 2019, Science Advances.

[19]  J. Aroviita,et al.  Riparian forests mitigate harmful ecological effects of agricultural diffuse pollution in medium-sized streams. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[20]  B. Sures,et al.  Multiple stressors and the role of hydrology on benthic invertebrates in mountainous streams. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[21]  D. Carlisle,et al.  Linking the Agricultural Landscape of the Midwest to Stream Health with Structural Equation Modeling. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  S. Ormerod,et al.  Evaluating riparian solutions to multiple stressor problems in river ecosystems - A conceptual study. , 2018, Water research.

[23]  D. Wolock,et al.  Biological relevance of streamflow metrics: regional and national perspectives , 2017, Freshwater Science.

[24]  D. Hering,et al.  Additive effects prevail: The response of biota to multiple stressors in an intensively monitored watershed. , 2017, The Science of the total environment.

[25]  R. Hawley,et al.  When do macroinvertebrate communities of reference streams resemble urban streams? The biological relevance of Qcritical , 2016, Freshwater Science.

[26]  R. Hughes,et al.  Multi-scale assessment of human-induced changes to Amazonian instream habitats , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[27]  K. Capps,et al.  Global perspectives on the urban stream syndrome , 2016, Freshwater Science.

[28]  Anthony R. Olsen,et al.  The Stream‐Catchment (StreamCat) Dataset: A Database of Watershed Metrics for the Conterminous United States , 2016 .

[29]  W. Clements,et al.  Effects of major ions on natural benthic communities: an experimental assessment of the US Environmental Protection Agency aquatic life benchmark for conductivity , 2016, Freshwater Science.

[30]  Wesley M. Daniel,et al.  Characterizing coal and mineral mines as a regional source of stress to stream fish assemblages , 2015 .

[31]  P. Kaufmann,et al.  Bedded Sediment Conditions and Macroinvertebrate Responses in New Mexico Streams: A First Step in Establishing Sediment Criteria , 2014 .

[32]  S. J. Birks,et al.  Stable isotope estimates of evaporation : inflow and water residence time for lakes across the United States as a tool for national lake water quality assessments , 2014 .

[33]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[34]  I. Waite.  Agricultural disturbance response models for invertebrate and algal metrics from streams at two spatial scales within the U.S. , 2014, Hydrobiologia.

[35]  D. Hooper,et al.  Impacts of land use at the catchment scale constrain the habitat benefits of stream riparian buffers , 2013 .

[36]  J. Harding,et al.  Habitat loss drives threshold response of benthic invertebrate communities to deposited sediment in agricultural streams. , 2013, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[37]  S. Sabater,et al.  Effects of hydromorphological impacts on river ecosystem functioning: a review and suggestions for assessing ecological impacts , 2013, Hydrobiologia.

[38]  John Pitlick,et al.  Relations between streamflow, sediment transport, and aquatic habitat in regulated rivers , 2013 .

[39]  J. Schmidt,et al.  A Geological Framework for Interpreting Downstream Effects of Dams on Rivers , 2013 .

[40]  D. McKnight,et al.  Climate-change-driven deterioration of water quality in a mineralized watershed. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[42]  Michael J. Wiley,et al.  Impacts of agricultural land use on biological integrity: A causal analysis , 2011 .

[43]  D. Borrok,et al.  Anthropogenic sulfate loads in the Rio Grande, New Mexico (USA) , 2011 .

[44]  M. Mast,et al.  Response of lake chemistry to changes in atmospheric deposition and climate in three high-elevation wilderness areas of Colorado , 2011 .

[45]  Donald E. Weller,et al.  Anthropogenic disturbance and streams: land use and land‐use change affect stream ecosystems via multiple pathways , 2011 .

[46]  R. Hughes,et al.  The Mining Law of 1872: Change is Overdue , 2010 .

[47]  P. Kaufmann,et al.  Protecting sediment-sensitive aquatic species in mountain streams through the application of biologically based streambed sediment criteria , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[48]  Samuel M. Scheiner,et al.  On the specification of structural equation models for ecological systems. , 2010 .

[49]  J. Feminella,et al.  Seasonal variability of landuse impacts on macroinvertebrate assemblages in streams of western Georgia, USA , 2009, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[50]  A. Herlihy,et al.  The relative influence of geographic location and reach-scale habitat on benthic invertebrate assemblages in six ecoregions , 2009, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[51]  P. Kaufmann,et al.  Bed Stability and Sedimentation Associated With Human Disturbances in Pacific Northwest Streams 1 , 2009 .

[52]  Robert M. Hughes,et al.  Acquiring data for large aquatic resource surveys: the art of compromise among science, logistics, and reality , 2008, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[53]  D. V. Peck,et al.  Twelve invasive plant taxa in US western riparian ecosystems , 2008, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[54]  D. V. Peck,et al.  Survey design and extent estimates for the Wadeable Streams Assessment , 2008, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[55]  Lester L. Yuan,et al.  Striving for consistency in a national assessment: the challenges of applying a reference-condition approach at a continental scale , 2008, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[56]  Robert M. Hughes,et al.  A process for creating multimetric indices for large-scale aquatic surveys , 2008, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[57]  P. Kaufmann,et al.  A roughness-corrected index of relative bed stability for regional stream surveys , 2008 .

[58]  T. Royer,et al.  Relationships between water quality, habitat quality, and macroinvertebrate assemblages in Illinois streams. , 2007, Journal of environmental quality.

[59]  J. Olden,et al.  Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  J. Stromberg,et al.  Importance of low-flow and high-flow characteristics to restoration of riparian vegetation along rivers in arid south-western United States , 2007 .

[61]  C. Hawkins.  Quantifying biological integrity by taxonomic completeness: its utility in regional and global assessments. , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[62]  M. Delong,et al.  The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time , 2006 .

[63]  K. Bollen,et al.  Interpreting the Results from Multiple Regression and Structural Equation Models , 2005 .

[64]  P. Groffman,et al.  The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure , 2005, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[65]  J. Stoddard,et al.  Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. , 2005, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[66]  J. Allan.  Landscapes and Riverscapes: The Influence of Land Use on Stream Ecosystems , 2004 .

[67]  N. Poff,et al.  How Dams Vary and Why It Matters for the Emerging Science of Dam Removal , 2002 .

[68]  K. Fausch,et al.  Landscapes to Riverscapes: Bridging the Gap between Research and Conservation of Stream Fishes , 2002 .

[69]  J. Wiens.  Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water , 2002 .

[70]  Richard H. Norris,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF PREDICTIVE MODELS FOR MEASURING THE BIOLOGICAL INTEGRITY OF STREAMS , 2000 .

[71]  G. Helfman,et al.  Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[72]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[73]  R. Stine,et al.  Bootstrapping Goodness-of-Fit Measures in Structural Equation Models , 1992 .

[74]  F. Swanson,et al.  An Ecosystem Perspective of Riparian ZonesFocus on links between land and water , 1991 .

[75]  C. Frissell,et al.  A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context , 1986 .

[76]  B. Swift.  Status of Riparian Ecosystems in the United States , 1984 .

[77]  R. Hughes,et al.  Disentangling the pathways of land use impacts on the functional structure of fish assemblages in Amazon streams , 2018, Ecography.