Operation, Valuation and Electricity Sourcing for a Generic Aluminium Smelter

Electricity prices vary across different geographic locations and affect the relative cost position of individual aluminium producers. Understanding the scope of electricity price risk is thus of high importance to industry players. We propose a sequential valuation and optimisation approach for investigating the relationship between operating policy, electricity sourcing and smelter value. The hybrid optimisation approach determines a heuristic operating policy with the least squares Monte Carlo (LSM) method and uses portfolio optimisation to find a corresponding electricity procurement scheme. We find that the resulting procurement scheme reduces the risk of shutdowns without compromising smelter value. In addition, the procurement scheme obtained when using demand derived from the heuristic operating policy outperforms the one found when treating demand as constant. Our findings show that there is substantial value in operational flexibility and suggest that decisions on electricity sourcing should be coupled with the operating policy. This could motivate the industry to adapt a valuation approach that captures the full value of operational flexibility and yields a corresponding operating policy.

[1]  How Commodity Price Curves and Inventories React to a Short-Run Scarcity Shock , 2010 .

[2]  A. Conejo,et al.  A Stochastic Programming Approach to Electric Energy Procurement for Large Consumers , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Kenneth Rogoff,et al.  Empirical exchange rate models of the seventies , 1983 .

[4]  H. Geman Commodities and Commodity Derivatives: Modelling and Pricing for Agriculturals, Metals and Energy , 2005 .

[5]  Nicola Secomandi,et al.  Relaxations of Approximate Linear Programs for the Real Option Management of Commodity Storage , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[6]  W. Ziemba,et al.  Hedging electricity portfolios via stochastic programming , 2002 .

[7]  Lihua Yu,et al.  Decision Aids for Scheduling and Hedging (DASH) in deregulated electricity markets: a stochastic programming approach to power portfolio optimization , 2002, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference.

[8]  Arne Andresen,et al.  Multi-factor models and the risk premiums: a simulation study , 2013 .

[9]  Francis A. Longstaff,et al.  Valuing American Options by Simulation: A Simple Least-Squares Approach , 2001 .

[10]  Andrew E. B. Lim,et al.  Conditional value-at-risk in portfolio optimization: Coherent but fragile , 2011, Oper. Res. Lett..

[11]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Electricity Prices and Power Derivatives: Evidence from the Nordic Power Exchange , 2000 .

[12]  Artur Rodrigues,et al.  The Valuation of Real Options with the Least Squares Monte Carlo Simulation Method , 2006 .

[13]  G. Davis Technical Note: Simulating the Two-Factor Schwartz and Smith Model of Commodity Prices , 2012 .

[14]  Time-varying long-run mean of commodity prices and the modeling of futures term structures , 2012 .

[15]  Miles G. Nicholls Optimizing the Operations of an Aluminium Smelter Using Non-Linear Bi-Level Programming , 1998 .

[16]  Tanya Styblo Beder,et al.  VAR: Seductive but Dangerous , 1995 .

[17]  The Choice of Stochastic Process in Real Option Valuation II : Selecting Multiple Factor Models , 2012 .

[18]  Matt Thompson,et al.  Optimal Economic Dispatch and Risk Management of Thermal Power Plants in Deregulated Markets , 2013, Oper. Res..

[19]  M. K. Sheikh-El-Eslami,et al.  A Stochastic-Based Decision-Making Framework for an Electricity Retailer: Time-of-Use Pricing and Electricity Portfolio Optimization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  D. Duffie,et al.  An Overview of Value at Risk , 1997 .

[21]  Siem Jan Koopman,et al.  Structural Time Series Models , 2005 .

[22]  M. Ilić,et al.  Stochastic modeling of electric power prices in a multi-market environment , 2000, 2000 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37077).

[23]  Philippe Jorion,et al.  Firm Value and Hedging: Evidence from U.S. Oil and Gas Producers , 2006 .

[24]  A Simulation-based Portfolio Optimization Approach with Least Squares Learning , 2014 .

[25]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Short-Term Variations and Long-Term Dynamics in Commodity Prices , 2000 .

[26]  Alvaro Escribano,et al.  Modelling Electricity Prices: International Evidence , 2011 .

[27]  Eduardo S. Schwartz The stochastic behavior of commodity prices: Implications for valuation and hedging , 1997 .

[28]  J. Carriére Valuation of the early-exercise price for options using simulations and nonparametric regression , 1996 .

[29]  Gonzalo Cortazar,et al.  The valuation of multidimensional American real options using the LSM simulation method , 2008, Comput. Oper. Res..

[30]  Nelson Areal,et al.  Improvements to the Least Squares Monte Carlo Option Valuation Method , 2008 .

[31]  M. Davison,et al.  Natural gas storage valuation and optimization: A real options application , 2009 .

[32]  Giuseppe Alesii Assessing Least Squares Monte Carlo for the Kulatilaka Trigeorgis General Real Options Pricing Model , 2008 .

[33]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Regression methods for pricing complex American-style options , 2001, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[34]  M. C. Bueso,et al.  Modeling Aluminum Smelter Plants Using Sliced Inverse Regression With a View Towards Load Flexibility , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[35]  Andrea Gamba,et al.  Structural Estimation of Real Options Models , 2008 .

[36]  Harald A. Øye,et al.  Power failure, restart and repair , 2011 .

[37]  R. Carmona,et al.  Valuation of energy storage: an optimal switching approach , 2010 .

[38]  Manuel Moreno,et al.  On the Robustness of Least-Squares Monte Carlo (LSM) for Pricing American Derivatives , 2007 .

[39]  R. Rockafellar,et al.  Optimization of conditional value-at risk , 2000 .

[40]  Eduardo S. Schwartz,et al.  Evaluating Natural Resource Investments , 1985 .

[41]  Financial Valuation of Operational Flexibilities in the Aluminum Industry using Real Option Theory , 2013 .