Independent control of the digits predicts an apparent hierarchy of visuomotor channels in grasping

If an object changes position at the onset of a reach-to-grasp movement, both the transport speed and the grip aperture are adjusted. If the object changes in size at the onset, only the grip aperture is adjusted. This combination of results has been interpreted as being the consequence of a hierarchical relationship between visuomotor channels for transport and grip. We argue that our alternative view on grasping can account for the observed behaviour without making new assumptions. In our view, grasping consists of smooth (minimal jerk) movements of each digit to a target position on the object. The digits' target positions change, both when object position and when object size change. A model in which the individual digits move smoothly to these new positions yields the same behaviour as is observed experimentally.

[1]  Tamar Flash,et al.  Mechanisms underlying the generation of averaged modified trajectories , 1995, Biological Cybernetics.

[2]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Prehension Movements: The Visuomotor Channels Hypothesis Revisited , 1996 .

[3]  N Teasdale,et al.  Deceleration requirements and the control of pointing movements. , 1991, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  T. Flash,et al.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  T. Flash,et al.  Arm Trajectory Modifications During Reaching Towards Visual Targets , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Jeroen B. J. Smeets.  Grasping neurones , 2000 .

[7]  M. Jeannerod.  Intersegmental coordination during reaching at natural visual objects , 1981 .

[8]  Smeets,et al.  Grip formation as an emergent property. Response To commentaries on "A new view on grasping" , 1999, Motor control.

[9]  M. Jeannerod.  Visuomotor channels: Their integration in goal-directed prehension , 1999 .

[10]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Effects of Object Texture on Precontact Movement Time in Human Prehension. , 1994, Journal of motor behavior.

[11]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[12]  C. C. A. M. Gielen,et al.  Conditions determining early modification of motor programmes in response to changes in target location , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Selective perturbation of visual input during prehension movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[15]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Integrated control of hand transport and orientation during prehension movements , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[16]  E. Brenner,et al.  Independent movements of the digits in grasping , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  E. Brenner,et al.  Fast Responses of the Human Hand to Changes in Target Position. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  M. A. Arbib,et al.  Models of Trajectory Formation and Temporal Interaction of Reach and Grasp. , 1993, Journal of motor behavior.

[19]  U. Castiello,et al.  Reach to grasp: the response to a simultaneous perturbation of object position and size , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  H. Nagasaki.  Asymmetric velocity and acceleration profiles of human arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  A. Milner,et al.  Visual size processing in spatial neglect , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[23]  R Huys,et al.  Control of rapid aimed hand movements: the one-target advantage. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  C. Prablanc,et al.  Automatic control during hand reaching at undetected two-dimensional target displacements. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Wouter Hulstijn,et al.  Fast adjustments of ongoing movements in hemiparetic cerebral palsy , 2002, Neuropsychologia.