Using Language Engineering Programs to Raise Awareness of Future CALL Potential

This paper describes a series of awareness-raising activities for English language secondary school teachers-in-training - with a view to evaluating future, that is, 'intelligent', CALL for English language teaching. The paper first puts the development of CALL applications into perspective (after Atwell, 1999; Warschauer and Healey, 1998) in terms of its impact on ESL teachers. The paper then describes a series of activities intended to raise English language teachers' awareness and to enable them to evaluate advances in IT technology - as these will affect ESL teaching and learning. In order to achieve this future perspective, the activities described centre around language engineering software that than current CALL software per se. The paper makes reference to the secondary education system in Hong Kong, where there has been a strong push by the government for IT to support the classroom teaching of all subjects by at least 25%. For such a policy to even begin to be achieved, and for the classroom use of IT to be appropriate and effective, two conditions need to be in place. Firstly, teachers need to be familiar with and comfortable in the use of IT - specifically, the widening range of language engineering software. Secondly, they need to be able to evaluate the possibilities that IT offers. It is only if these two conditions are met that there is a greater chance that future use of CALL will be integrated into teaching in a worthwhile manner.

[1]  Hong Kong,et al.  Building Hong Kong for a new era : the 1997 policy address , 1997 .

[2]  Glyn Jones Teaching languages with computers. The state of the art , 1990 .

[3]  Robert Williams Automated essay grading: an evaluation of four conceptual models , 2001 .

[4]  Nancy A. Armstrong “Tell Me More About That …” , 2006 .

[5]  WestOne,et al.  Tell me more , 2003 .

[6]  Silke M. Witt,et al.  Use of speech recognition in computer-assisted language learning , 2000 .

[7]  Peter W. Foltz,et al.  The intelligent essay assessor: Applications to educational technology , 1999 .

[8]  Pamela S. Morgan,et al.  Figuring out figure out. Metaphor and the semantics of the English verb-particle construction , 1997 .

[9]  Martha C. Pennington,et al.  Teaching Languages with Computers: The State of the Art , 1992 .

[10]  Barbara Beyerbach,et al.  Infusing Technology into Preservice Teacher Education , 2001 .

[11]  Paul Procter,et al.  Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English , 1978 .

[12]  Uschi Felix Beyond Babel: Language Learning Online. , 2001 .

[13]  Trena M. Paulus,et al.  The Impact of Call Instruction on Classroom Computer Use: A Foundation for Rethinking Technology in Teacher Education , 2002 .

[14]  Ruslan Mitkov,et al.  Robust Pronoun Resolution with Limited Knowledge , 1998, ACL.

[15]  Della Summers,et al.  Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English , 1995 .

[16]  David Coniam IT Use in the English Language Classroom in Hong Kong: How Far Is Government Policy Being Achieved? , 2002 .

[17]  Torbjörn Lager Transformation-Based Learning of Rules for Constraint Grammar Tagging , 2001, NODALIDA.

[18]  David Coniam,et al.  Voice Recognition Software Accuracy with Second Language Speakers of English. , 1999 .

[19]  Bashar Nuseibeh,et al.  E-Assessment using Latent Semantic Analysis , 2003, LeGE-WG 3.

[20]  M. Warschauer,et al.  Computers and language learning: an overview , 1998, Language Teaching.