Using pitfall traps arrays to estimate the home range of a Cerrado lizard in Central Brazil

Although the broad distribution of a species is ruled by several biotic and abiotic factors, the spatial distribution of a local population is affected by social interactions between individuals, competition (intra and interspecific), predation and resource availability (Brown et al., 2009). In a finer scale perspective, the home range is a small portion of the available habitat used by an individual within a population that provides its everyday needs, such as food, shelter and reproductive mates (Ferner, 1974; Perry and Garland Jr, 2002), with the individual completing its entire life cycle within this area (Rose, 1982). Home range is crucial information for studies focusing on mating systems or territoriality (Melo et al., 2017). The size of an individual home range is shaped by species ecology and behavior (Rose, 1982), and is related to species social system, individual social status, resource use and availability, and group cohesion (Stone et al., 2002). Changes in home range size (in space or in time), for example, can be produced by the species’ biology, but also by individuals’ social interactions (Ferner, 1974) and habitat fragmentation (Young et al., 2018). These changes are often larger for larger animals (or individuals) and species of higher trophic status (Rocha, 1999; Mitchell and Powell, 2012). Territories are areas inside home ranges that are exclusively used by an individual and are often defended against the entrance of other individuals, cospecific or not (Schoener, 1968), and can be smaller or close in area to the home range. In territorial systems, the individuals usually defend all their home range, often using a set of warning or aggressive behaviours to exclude other individuals from the territory (Stone et al., 2002), diminishing home range overlaps. Although the territory size may be variable, it is sometimes inflexible and populations are expected to be regulated in stable densities (Adams, 2001). As resource availability commonly changes with time and between different habitats, the density in natural populations tends to Herpetology Notes, volume 11: 985-991 (2018) (published online on 26 November 2018)

[1]  Wade A. Ryberg,et al.  Fragmentation alters home range and movements of the Dunes Sagebrush Lizard (Sceloporus arenicolus) , 2018, Canadian Journal of Zoology.

[2]  F. B. Cruz,et al.  Scale dependency of Liolaemus lizards’ home range in response to different environmental variables , 2016, Current zoology.

[3]  C. Rocha,et al.  Challenges and Perspectives for Studies on Home Range of Lizards from South America , 2015 .

[4]  L. Vitt,et al.  Life history data of lizards of the world , 2015 .

[5]  Murray Ellis,et al.  A simulation study to quantify drift fence configuration and spacing effects when sampling mobile animals , 2014 .

[6]  R. Powell,et al.  Foraging optimally for home ranges , 2012 .

[7]  Peter Muhlberger,et al.  Toe Clipping of Amphibians and Reptiles: Science, Ethics, and the Law1 , 2011 .

[8]  Heiko G. Rödel,et al.  Female home range size is regulated by resource distribution and intraspecific competition: a long-term field study , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  L. B. Ribeiro,et al.  Range structure, microhabitat use, and activity patterns of the saxicolous lizard Tropidurus torquatus (Tropiduridae) on a rock outcrop in Minas Gerais, Brazil , 2009 .

[10]  Jason L. Brown,et al.  Home range size and location in relation to reproductive resources in poison frogs (Dendrobatidae): a Monte Carlo approach using GIS data , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Noraly Shawen Liou História natural de duas espécies simpátricas de Enyalius (Squamata, Leiosauridae) na Mata Atlântica do sudeste brasileiro , 2008 .

[12]  Martin Eiblmaier,et al.  The influence of competitor density on space use in juvenile striped plateau lizards (Sceloporus virgatus) , 2008 .

[13]  J. Row,et al.  Kernels Are Not Accurate Estimators of Home-range Size for Herpetofauna , 2006, Copeia.

[14]  R. Shine,et al.  How much stress do researchers inflict on their study animals? A case study using a scincid lizard, Eulamprus heatwolei , 2006, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  Melinda L. Moir,et al.  REFINING SAMPLING PROTOCOLS FOR INVENTORYING INVERTEBRATE BIODIVERSITY: INFLUENCE OF DRIFT-FENCE LENGTH AND PITFALL TRAP DIAMETER ON SPIDERS , 2005 .

[16]  B. Wone,et al.  Movement, Home Range, and Activity Patterns of the Horned Lizard, Phrynosoma mcallii , 2003 .

[17]  H. John-Alder,et al.  Home-Range Analysis in Sceloporus undulatus (Eastern Fence Lizard). I. Spacing Patterns and the Context of Territorial Behavior , 2003, Copeia.

[18]  P. A. Stone,et al.  Estimating Lizard Home Range: The Rose Model Revisited , 2002 .

[19]  Eldridge S. Adams,et al.  APPROACHES TO THE STUDY OF TERRITORY SIZE AND SHAPE , 2001 .

[20]  C. Rocha Home range of the Tropidurid lizard Liolaemus lutzae: sexual and body size differences , 1999 .

[21]  J. F. Ribeiro,et al.  Fitofisionomias do bioma cerrado. , 1998 .

[22]  M. V. Sluys Home Range of the Saxicolous Lizard Tropidurus itambere (Tropiduridae) in Southeastern Brazil , 1997 .

[23]  Miguel Trefaut Urbano Rodrigues,et al.  Sistemática, ecologia e zoogeografia dos Tropidurus do grupo Torquatus ao sul do Rio Amazonas (Sauria, Iguanidae) , 1987 .

[24]  B. Rose Lizard Home Ranges: Methodology and Functions , 1982 .

[25]  T. Schoener,et al.  INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION IN HOME-RANGE SIZE IN SOME ANOLIS LIZARDS' , 1982 .

[26]  John W. Ferner Home-Range Size and Overlap in Sceloporus undulatus erythrocheilus (Reptilia: Iguanidae) , 1974 .

[27]  D. Tinkle,et al.  Home Range Ecology of Uta Stansburiana Stejnegeri , 1962 .

[28]  C. Galdino,et al.  Spatial organisation of the Neotropical lizard Tropidurus hispidus (Squamata: Tropiduridae) , 2017 .

[29]  Rodrigo Santos Ecologia de Cnemidophorus vacariensis Feltrim & Lema, 2000 (Squamata, Teiidae) nos campos do Planalto das Araucárias do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil : atividade, uso do microhabitat e área de vida , 2008 .

[30]  A. Prieto,et al.  ÁREA DE ACTIVIDAD Y COMPORTAMIENTO DEL LAGARTO Tropidurus hispidus (Spix 1825) (SAURIA-TROPIDURIDAE) EN CERRO COLORADO. CUMANÁ, ESTADO SUCRE, VENEZUELA , 2004 .

[31]  Uetz Peter,et al.  The Reptile Database , 1995 .

[32]  P. S. Corn,et al.  Evaluation of pitfall trapping in northwestern forests: trap arrays with drift fences , 1987 .

[33]  K. Christian,et al.  The relationship between lizard home range and body size: a reanalysis of the data , 1984 .

[34]  T. Schoener Sizes of Feeding Territories among Birds , 1968 .