Building an understanding of heat transfer concepts in undergraduate chemical engineering courses

Understanding the distinctions among heat, energy and temperature can be difficult for students at all levels of instruction, including those in engineering. Misconceptions about heat transfer have been found to persist, even after students successfully complete relevant coursework. New instructional methods are needed to address these misconceptions. This pilot study examined whether researcher-developed and inquiry-based activities could increase conceptual understanding of heat transfer and a1ter common misconceptions. Twenty-two undergraduate chemical engineering students were assessed before and after instruction with inquiry-based activities using a ten-item concept inventory. Concept inventory questions were developed to assess students' performance on questions closely related to the inquiry-based activities and questions applying concepts in new contexts. Participants significantly improved their overall scores from pre-test to post-test. An examination of performance on individual items revealed significant improvement on half of those questions closely related to the instructional activities and half of those applying concepts in new but related contexts. Results are examined in light of the assessment and inquiry activities that were used, as well as the difficu1ty of the concepts. Educational implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.

[1]  Graham E. Oberem,et al.  Understanding of Elementary Concepts in Heat and Temperature among College Students and K-12 Teachers , 2002 .

[2]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Use of the particle nature of matter in developing conceptual understanding , 1993 .

[3]  Edward L. Smith.  A conceptual change model of learning science , 1991 .

[4]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Influence of levels of information as presented by different technologies on students' understanding of acid, base, and ph concepts , 1994 .

[5]  Peter Harriott,et al.  Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering , 2004 .

[6]  Margot A. Vigeant,et al.  Using inquiry-based activities to promote understanding of critical engineering concepts. , 2006 .

[7]  Shanah M. Suping,et al.  Conceptual Change among Students in Science. ERIC Digest. , 2003 .

[8]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[9]  J. Bransford.  How people learn , 2000 .

[10]  J. Roschelle,et al.  Misconceptions Reconceived: A Constructivist Analysis of Knowledge in Transition , 1994 .

[11]  Thomas J. Shuell,et al.  Designing Instructional Computing Systems for Meaningful Learning , 1992 .

[12]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[13]  Katharyn E. K. Nottis,et al.  The Effect of Instructional Modality and Prior Knowledge on Learning Point Group Symmetry , 2005 .

[14]  Ruth A. Streveler,et al.  Misconceptions About Rate Processes: Preliminary Evidence For The Importance Of Emergent Conceptual Schemas In Thermal And Transport Sciences , 2006 .

[15]  A. H. Johnstone,et al.  The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to changing demand , 1993 .

[16]  Kevin J. Carlton,et al.  Teaching about heat and temperature , 2000 .

[17]  Philip M. Sadler,et al.  Teacher predictions versus actual student gains , 1993 .

[18]  Isabel Malaquias,et al.  An Attempt to Overcome Alternative Conceptions Related to Heat and Temperature. , 1995 .

[19]  R. Mayer.  Rote Versus Meaningful Learning , 2002 .