Type of items and the magnitude of gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test.

The present study considered the structure of the drawings used in the Mental Rotations Test (MRT) to examine whether distractors that are either a mirror image or structurally different from the target as well as response alternatives with occluded and nonoccluded parts affect the magnitude of gender differences on this test. One hundred and three women and 100 men undergraduate students were given unlimited time to complete the MRT. A gender by occlusion interaction on correct responses showed that gender differences were larger for occluded than for nonoccluded items. Examination of performance as a function of item placement in the test suggested that it is unlikely that the results could be accounted for by differential practice effects in women and men. Implications of these results for explanations of gender differences on the MRT and for the training of spatial abilities are discussed.

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  P. McCormick,et al.  Timing conditions and the magnitude of gender differences on the Mental Rotations Test , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[3]  M. S. Masters,et al.  The gender difference on the Mental Rotations test is not due to performance factors , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Janet Shibley Hyde,et al.  Gender Differences in Human Cognition , 1997 .

[5]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[6]  S. Vandenberg,et al.  Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  B. J. Winer.  Statistical Principles in Experimental Design , 1992 .

[8]  D. Collins,et al.  A large sex difference on a two-dimensional mental rotation task. , 1997, Behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  M. Peters,et al.  A Redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Test - Different Versions and Factors That Affect Performance , 1995, Brain and Cognition.

[10]  P. Lachenbruch.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[11]  D. Goldstein,et al.  Sex differences in visual-spatial ability: The role of performance factors , 1990, Memory & cognition.

[12]  M. Peters,et al.  Sex differences and the factor of time in solving Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotation problems , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[13]  D. Voyer,et al.  Scoring procedure, performance factors, and magnitude of sex differences in spatial performance. , 1997, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  Alan Feingold,et al.  Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. , 1988 .

[15]  Jonathan E. Roberts,et al.  Sex Differences on a Computerized Mental Rotation Task Disappear with Computer Familiarization , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[16]  Jamie I. D. Campbell,et al.  More power to you: Simple power calculations for treatment effects with one degree of freedom , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[17]  Daniel Voyer,et al.  The relation between spatial and mathematical abilities: Potential factors underlying suppression , 2003 .

[18]  Susan D. Voyer,et al.  Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. , 1995, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  L. Hedges,et al.  Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. , 1995, Science.

[20]  J. L. Myers.  Fundamentals of Experimental Design , 1972 .

[21]  Jerome L. Myers,et al.  Fundamentals of experimental design, 2nd ed. , 1972 .

[22]  N. Newcombe,et al.  The role of experience in spatial test performance: A meta-analysis , 1989 .

[23]  M. Linn,et al.  Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. , 1985, Child development.

[24]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[25]  G. Loftus.  On interpretation of interactions , 1978 .