One‐dimensional photogeneration profiles in silicon solar cells with pyramidal texture

The key metric of surface texturing is the short-circuit current Jsc. It depends on front surface transmittance, light trapping and the spatial profiles of photogeneration G and collection efficiency ηc. To take advantage of a one-dimensional profile of ηc(ζ), where ζ is the shortest distance to the p–n junction, we determine G(ζ) via ray tracing. This permits rigorous optical assessment of common pyramidal textures for various cell designs. When ζ is small, G(ζ) is largest beneath regular inverted pyramids, upright pyramids (regular or random) and planar surfaces, respectively. This higher G(ζ) results in superior collection of generated carriers in front-junction cells. In simulations of a conventional screen-print cell, 92.0% of generated carriers are collected for inverted pyramids, compared to 91.4% for upright pyramids, and 90.0% for a planar surface. Higher efficiency and rear junction devices are analysed in the paper. Despite differences in G(ζ) beneath textures, inverted pyramids achieve the highest Jsc for all cell designs examined (marginally so for high-efficiency rear-contact cells) due to superior front surface transmittance and light trapping. We assess a common one-dimensional model for photogeneration beneath textured surfaces. This model underestimates G(ζ) when ζ is small, and overestimates G(ζ) when ζ is large. As a result, the generation current determined is inaccurate for thin substrates. It can be computed to within 3% error for 250 µm thick substrates. However, errors in G(ζ) can lead to 7.5% inaccuracy in calculations of Jsc. Errors are largest for lower efficiency designs, in which collection efficiency varies through the substrate. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M. Green,et al.  19.8% efficient “honeycomb” textured multicrystalline and 24.4% monocrystalline silicon solar cells , 1998 .

[2]  Paul A. Basore,et al.  Extended spectral analysis of internal quantum efficiency , 1993, Conference Record of the Twenty Third IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1993 (Cat. No.93CH3283-9).

[3]  D. A. Clugston,et al.  PC1D version 5: 32-bit solar cell modeling on personal computers , 1997, Conference Record of the Twenty Sixth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1997.

[4]  Jürgen H. Werner,et al.  Quantum efficiency analysis of thin-layer silicon solar cells with back surface fields and optical confinement , 1996 .

[5]  M. Green Silicon solar cells : advanced principles and practice , 1995 .

[6]  Martin A. Green,et al.  Twenty‐four percent efficient silicon solar cells with double layer antireflection coatings and reduced resistance loss , 1995 .

[7]  Paul A. Basore,et al.  Numerical modeling of textured silicon solar cells using PC-1D , 1990 .

[8]  M. Green,et al.  Optical properties of intrinsic silicon at 300 K , 1995 .

[9]  E. Yablonovitch Statistical ray optics , 1982 .

[10]  Stefan W. Glunz,et al.  Theory and experiments on the back side reflectance of silicon wafer solar cells , 2008 .

[11]  Russell A. Chipman,et al.  Properties of the polarization ray tracing matrix , 2007, SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications.

[12]  R. M. Swanson,et al.  MANUFACTURE OF SOLAR CELLS WITH 21% EFFICIENCY , 2004 .

[13]  J.E. Cotter RaySim 6.0: a free geometrical ray tracing program for silicon solar cells , 2005, Conference Record of the Thirty-first IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2005..

[14]  Jose Rodriguez Random pyramidal texture modelling , 1997 .

[15]  Zhongquan Ma,et al.  Internal quantum efficiency for solar cells , 2008 .

[16]  M. Green,et al.  Light trapping properties of pyramidally textured surfaces , 1987 .

[17]  P. Campbell,et al.  Light trapping in textured solar cells , 1990 .

[18]  P. Fath,et al.  Two- and three-dimensional optical carrier generation determination in crystalline silicon solar cells , 1998 .

[19]  M. E. Buck,et al.  Experimental optimization of an anisotropic etching process for random texturization of silicon solar cells , 1991, The Conference Record of the Twenty-Second IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1991.

[20]  K. McIntosh,et al.  Reflection of normally incident light from silicon solar cells with pyramidal texture , 2011 .

[21]  R. Depine,et al.  Ray tracing vs. electromagnetic methods in the analysis of antireflective textured surfaces [of solar cells] , 1997, Conference Record of the Twenty Sixth IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference - 1997.

[22]  R. Greef,et al.  A Detailed Study of P-N Junction Solar Cells by Means of Collection Efficiency , 2006, 2006 IEEE 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conference.

[23]  Keith R. McIntosh,et al.  A freeware program for precise optical analysis of the front surface of a solar cell , 2010, 2010 35th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference.

[24]  M. Ghannam,et al.  Optimum two-dimensional short circuit collection efficiency in thin multicrystalline silicon solar cells with optical confinement , 1998 .

[25]  Grupo Energia,et al.  RAY TRACING VS. ELECTROMAGNETIC METHODS IN THE ANALYSIS OF ANTIREFLECTIVE TEXTURED SURFACES , 1997 .

[26]  P. Campbell,et al.  Enhancement of light absorption from randomizing and geometric textures , 1993 .