Performance of Small-Scale Technology in Planting and Cutback Operations of Short-Rotation Willow Crops

Modern bioenergy crops have potential to play a crucial role in the global energy mix, especially under policies to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. The management of short-rotation willow crops involves several operations that deliver biomass for different uses. In commercial-scale operations, high-performance, mostly automated equipment is frequently used; however, in small-scale operations, smallholder farmers adapt traditional agricultural equipment to fit their needs. This study evaluated the field performance of planting and cutback operations in small-scale willow crops using equipment that was characterized by a low level of technological integration. Following the implementation of both operations, the planting work rates ranged from 0.216 to 0.300 ha h-1, depending on the soil preparation and planting density. Delays significantly reduced the field performance, resulting in gross work rates of 0.149 to 0.230 ha h-1. By comparison, cutback operations had higher work rates of 2.31 and 2.35 ha h-1 for gross and net production, respectively. These rates dropped to approximately 1.77 and 2.00 ha h-1, respectively, due to time spent in headland turns and other delays. Possibilities to improve the field performance depend on good preparation of the soil prior to planting, which includes removal of agricultural residue. In the case of cutback operations, avoiding backward movement of the equipment when additional headland space is available and an improved field layout may shorten the time spent in headland turns. The results indicate that small-scale energy crop plantations can be sustainable in terms of efficiency when unspecialized technologies are used. Therefore, small-scale agriculture can make a positive contribution to climate change mitigation targets.

[1]  MICHAEL B. Jones,et al.  Miscanthus for Renewable Energy Generation: European Union Experience and Projections for Illinois , 2004 .

[2]  Giulio Sperandio,et al.  Mechanized harvesting of eucalypt coppice for biomass production using high mechanization level. , 2012 .

[3]  A. Proto,et al.  Measuring the mobility parameters of tree-length forwarding systems using GPS technology in the Southern Italy forestry. , 2016 .

[4]  M. Labrecque,et al.  Planting microcuttings: An innovative method for establishing a willow vegetation cover , 2016 .

[5]  Dan Bergström,et al.  Productivity and Profitability of Forest Machines in the Harvesting of Normal and Overgrown Willow Plantations , 2012 .

[6]  R. Visser,et al.  Factors affecting forwarder productivity , 2018, European Journal of Forest Research.

[7]  Raffaele Spinelli,et al.  Harvesting techniques for non-industrial biomass plantations , 2012 .

[8]  Sara González-García,et al.  Life cycle assessment: an application to poplar for energy cultivated in Italy , 2012 .

[9]  David A. Bohan,et al.  A novel, integrated approach to assessing social, economic and environmental implications of changing rural land-use: A case study of perennial biomass crops , 2009 .

[10]  L. Sikanen,et al.  Assessing external factors on substitution of fossil fuel by biofuels: model perspective from the Nordic region , 2016, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[11]  R. Schubert,et al.  Future Bioenergy and Sustainable Land Use , 2009 .

[12]  Alvaro Marucci,et al.  Perspective and potential of CO2: A focus on potentials for renewable energy conversion in the Mediterranean basin , 2016 .

[13]  Stelian Alexandru Borz,et al.  Performance of Brush Cutters in Felling Operations of Willow Short Rotation Coppice , 2017 .

[14]  A. R. Proto,et al.  Performance of a mid-sized harvester-forwarder system in integrated harvesting of sawmill, pulpwood and firewood , 2017 .

[15]  Stelian Alexandru Borz,et al.  Automating Data Collection in Motor-manual Time and Motion Studies Implemented in a Willow Short Rotation Coppice , 2018 .

[16]  Giuseppe Zimbalatti,et al.  Roundwood and bioenergy production from forestry: Environmental impact assessment considering different logging systems , 2017 .

[17]  Ralph P. Overend,et al.  Biomass and renewable fuels , 2001 .

[18]  Giulio Sperandio,et al.  Sustainability Assessment of a Self-Consumption Wood-Energy Chain on Small Scale for Heat Generation in Central Italy , 2015 .

[19]  Per-Anders Hansson,et al.  Climate Impact of Willow Grown for Bioenergy in Sweden , 2014, BioEnergy Research.

[20]  Gero Becker,et al.  Harvesting of short rotation coppice - harvesting trials with a cut and storage system in Germany. , 2012 .

[21]  Fabrizio Mazzetto,et al.  GNSS-based operational monitoring devices for forest logging operation chains , 2013 .

[22]  Reinhart Ceulemans,et al.  Operational short rotation woody crop plantations : manual or mechanised harvesting? , 2015 .

[23]  A R Proto,et al.  Risk Assessment of Repetitive Movements in Olive Growing: Analysis of Annual Exposure Level Assessment Models with the OCRA Checklist. , 2015, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[24]  Timothy A. Volk,et al.  Evaluation of a Single-Pass, Cut and Chip Harvest System on Commercial-Scale, Short-Rotation Shrub Willow Biomass Crops , 2014, BioEnergy Research.

[25]  Tomasz Trzepieciński,et al.  Development of Harvesting Machines for Willow Small-Sizes Plantations in East-Central Europe , 2016 .

[26]  T. Verwijst,et al.  Effects of competition between short-rotation willow and weeds on performance of different clones and associated weed flora during the first harvest cycle. , 2014 .

[27]  Kenneth Gillingham,et al.  Impact of bioenergy crops in a carbon dioxide constrained world: an application of the MiniCAM energy-agriculture and land use model , 2008 .

[28]  M. Ragwitz,et al.  Status and perspectives of renewable energy policy and deployment in the European Union—What is needed to reach the 2020 targets? , 2011 .

[29]  Stina Edelfeldt Influence of pre-emergence cutting characteristics on early willow establishment , 2015 .

[30]  R. Madlener,et al.  The Role of Wood Material for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation , 2006 .

[31]  M. Manzone,et al.  Planters performance during a very Short Rotation Coppice planting , 2014 .

[32]  T. Hoffmann,et al.  Harvest technology for short rotation coppices and costs of harvest, transport and storage , 2015 .

[33]  M. Manzone,et al.  Alternative planting method for short rotation coppice with poplar and willow , 2016 .

[34]  Giuseppe Zimbalatti,et al.  Time consumption and productivity of a medium size mobile tower yarder in downhill and uphill configurations: a case study in Czech Republic , 2016 .

[35]  André Faaij,et al.  Biomass production potentials in Central and Eastern Europe under different scenarios , 2007 .

[36]  T. Volk,et al.  Planting rates and delays during the establishment of willow biomass crops , 2015 .

[37]  B. Talbot,et al.  Good practice guidelines for biomass production studies , 2012 .

[38]  A R Proto,et al.  Risk assessment of repetitive movements in the citrus fruit industry. , 2010, Journal of agricultural safety and health.

[39]  Timothy A. Volk,et al.  Improving the Profitability of Willow Crops—Identifying Opportunities with a Crop Budget Model , 2011, BioEnergy Research.

[40]  John P. Fulton,et al.  Automated time study of skidders using global positioning system data , 2005 .

[41]  Koki Inoue,et al.  Application of a sugarcane harvester for harvesting of willow trees aimed at short rotation forestry: an experimental case study in Japan. , 2011 .

[42]  Mariusz J. Stolarski,et al.  Effect of storage methods on willow chips quality , 2016 .