Untangling the diffusion signal using the phasor transform

Separating the decay signal from diffusion‐weighted scans into two or more components can be challenging. The phasor technique is well established in the field of optical microscopy for visualization and separation of fluorescent dyes with different lifetimes. The use of the phasor technique for separation of diffusion‐weighted decay signals was recently proposed. In this study, we investigate the added value of this technique for fitting decay models and visualization of decay rates. Phasor visualization was performed in five glioblastoma patients. Using simulations, the influence of incorrect diffusivity values and of the number of b‐values on fitting a three‐component model with fixed diffusivities (dubbed “unmixing”) was investigated for both a phasor‐based fit and a linear least squares (LLS) fit. Phasor‐based intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) fitting was compared with nonlinear least squares (NLLS) and segmented fitting (SF) methods in terms of accuracy and precision. The distributions of the parameter estimates of simulated data were compared with those obtained in a healthy volunteer. In the phasor visualizations of two glioblastoma patients, a cluster of points was observed that was not seen in healthy volunteers. The identified cluster roughly corresponded to the enhanced edge region of the tumor of two glioblastoma patients visible on fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images. For fitting decay models the usefulness of the phasor transform is less pronounced, but the additional knowledge gained from the geometrical configuration of phasor space can aid fitting routines. This has led to slightly improved fitting results for the IVIM model: phasor‐based fitting yielded parameter maps with higher precision than the NLLS and SF methods for parameters f and D (interquartile range [IQR] for f: NLLS 27, SF 12, phasor 5.7%; IQR for D: NLLS 0.28, SF 0.18, phasor 0.10 μm2/s). For unmixing, LLS fitting slightly but consistently outperformed phasor‐based fitting in all of the tested scenarios.

[1]  P. Grenier,et al.  MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders. , 1986, Radiology.

[2]  C T Moonen,et al.  On the precision of diffusion/perfusion imaging by gradient sensitization , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  Thomas F. Coleman,et al.  On the convergence of interior-reflective Newton methods for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds , 1994, Math. Program..

[4]  D. Bihan,et al.  Molecular diffusion, tissue microdynamics and microstructure , 1995 .

[5]  H. Gudbjartsson,et al.  The rician distribution of noisy mri data , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Thomas F. Coleman,et al.  An Interior Trust Region Approach for Nonlinear Minimization Subject to Bounds , 1993, SIAM J. Optim..

[7]  P J Verveer,et al.  Global analysis of fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy data. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[8]  P. Verveer,et al.  Graphical representation and multicomponent analysis of single‐frequency fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy data , 2004, Journal of microscopy.

[9]  M. Bastin,et al.  Effects of dexamethasone on peritumoural oedematous brain: a DT-MRI study , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[10]  J. Helpern,et al.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging: The quantification of non‐gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  R. Clegg,et al.  Polar Plot Representation for Frequency-Domain Analysis of Fluorescence Lifetimes , 2005, Journal of Fluorescence.

[12]  E. Gratton,et al.  The phasor approach to fluorescence lifetime imaging analysis. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[13]  Peter J Verveer,et al.  Global analysis of time correlated single photon counting FRET-FLIM data. , 2009, Optics express.

[14]  Jan Sijbers,et al.  ExploreDTI: a graphical toolbox for processing, analyzing, and visualizing diffusion MR data , 2009 .

[15]  Farzad Fereidouni,et al.  A modified phasor approach for analyzing time‐gated fluorescence lifetime images , 2011, Journal of microscopy.

[16]  L Junck,et al.  Response assessment in neuro-oncology (a report of the RANO group): assessment of outcome in trials of diffuse low-grade gliomas. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[17]  Bram Stieltjes,et al.  Toward an optimal distribution of b values for intravoxel incoherent motion imaging. , 2011, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[18]  Hans C Gerritsen,et al.  Spectral phasor analysis allows rapid and reliable unmixing of fluorescence microscopy spectral images. , 2012, Optics express.

[19]  Lin-Feng Yan,et al.  Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of gliomas: efficacy in preoperative grading , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Reto Meuli,et al.  Measuring brain perfusion with intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM): Initial clinical experience , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[21]  Daniel K Sodickson,et al.  Comparison of fitting methods and b‐value sampling strategies for intravoxel incoherent motion in breast cancer , 2015, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Claus Belka,et al.  ESTRO-ACROP guideline "target delineation of glioblastomas". , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  Xi-xun Qi,et al.  Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis imaging derived maps may distinguish between low and high grade gliomas before surgery , 2018, European Radiology.

[24]  Matthew D. Budde,et al.  Design and Validation of Diffusion MRI Models of White Matter , 2017, Front. Phys..

[25]  Frank J Vergeldt,et al.  Multi-component quantitative magnetic resonance imaging by phasor representation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Martijn Froeling,et al.  “MASSIVE” brain dataset: Multiple acquisitions for standardization of structural imaging validation and evaluation , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  Sebastien Ourselin,et al.  The importance of correcting for signal drift in diffusion MRI , 2017, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[28]  Sijia Wang,et al.  Evaluation of cerebral glioma using 3T diffusion kurtosis tensor imaging and the relationship between diffusion kurtosis metrics and tumor cellularity , 2017, The Journal of international medical research.

[29]  İ. Solmaz,et al.  The evaluation of the effects of steroid treatment on the tumor and peritumoral edema by DWI and MR spectroscopy in brain tumors. , 2018, Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska.

[30]  Marion Smits,et al.  Pseudoprogression of brain tumors , 2018, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[31]  Alessandra Bertoldo,et al.  A robust deconvolution method to disentangle multiple water pools in diffusion MRI , 2018, NMR in biomedicine.

[32]  L Cirillo,et al.  Application of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of primitive brain tumours , 2018, The neuroradiology journal.