Synthesis of Procedures to Forecast and Monitor Work Zone Safety and Mobility Impacts

Administrative Final Rule CFR Part 630 Subpart J "Work Zone Safety and Mobility" requires that state transportation agencies (STAs) develop policies to investigate the safety and mobility impacts as early as possible in the project development process. The rule provides some flexibility by allowing each state to set its own procedures and policies to comply with the rule and by allowing states to seek solutions which are commensurate with the severity of the potential impacts and require the most aggressive planning for "Significant Projects." This report provides a synthesis of what is currently being done by STAs across the country to plan, manage, operate, and evaluate work zone safety and mobility. The research to develop this synthesis was broken into three distinct steps. The first step was to review the literature regarding work zone safety and mobility strategies. The second was to conduct interviews with staff members at 30 STAs. The last step was to conduct more detailed case studies of three STAs. The authors found that only California and Ohio (there may be more states than this, but these were the two discovered) had really thought about work zone impacts throughout the life-cycle of project development and project delivery and had documented the roles and interactions between different offices. Most agencies interviewed lacked objective performance data, although many described processes where they have experts review and evaluate work zones on a periodic or continuous basis.

[1]  Barry Maude Communication at work , 1977 .

[2]  Stephen H Richards,et al.  TRAFFIC CAPACITY THROUGH URBAN FREEWAY WORK ZONES IN TEXAS , 1982 .

[3]  Sally Cairns,et al.  TRAFFIC IMPACT OF HIGHWAY CAPACITY REDUCTIONS: ASSESSMENT OF THE EVIDENCE. , 1998 .

[4]  M. Baucus Transportation Research Board , 1982 .

[5]  David J. Lovell,et al.  A New Methodology to Estimate Capacity for Freeway Work Zones , 2001 .

[6]  Hesham A Rakha,et al.  Construction and Calibration of a Large-Scale Microsimulation Model of the Salt Lake Area , 1998 .

[7]  F. Hall,et al.  Guidelines for Estimating Capacity at Freeway Reconstruction Zones , 2003 .

[8]  A. Nicholson,et al.  Risk and Impact of Natural Hazards on a Road Network , 2001 .

[9]  J W Trombly,et al.  RESULTS OF 2002-2003 WORK ZONE SELF-ASSESSMENT , 2003 .

[10]  Steven D Schrock,et al.  TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FOR MERGE AREAS IN RURAL INTERSTATE WORK ZONES , 1999 .

[11]  Jerry L Graham,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL PLANS FOR HIGHWAY WORK ZONES , 1994 .

[12]  Thomas Schnell,et al.  Evaluation of Traffic Flow Analysis Tools Applied to Work Zones Based on Flow Data Collected in the Field , 2002 .

[13]  T Kuennen GET IN, GET OUT, STAY OUT - PORTLAND I-84 SPEED OF CONSTRUCTION , 2002 .

[14]  Joseph L. Schofer,et al.  Enhanced Crash Reporting to Explore Workzone Crash Patterns , 2001 .

[15]  C L Dudek,et al.  A MODEL TO CALCULATE THE ROAD USER COSTS AT WORK ZONES , 1982 .

[16]  R. Souleyrette,et al.  Impact of Weather on Urban Freeway Traffic Flow Characteristics and Facility Capacity , 2005 .

[17]  E C Sullivan,et al.  ACCIDENT RATES DURING NIGHTTIME CONSTRUCTION , 1989 .

[18]  M. Anderson-Wilk,et al.  Effectiveness of extra enforcement in construction and maintenance work zones , 2003 .

[19]  Carol Keenan WORK ZONES THAT WORK , 2004 .

[20]  T Scriba,et al.  MAKING WORK ZONES WORK BETTER: THE FINAL RULE ON WORK ZONE SAFETY AND MOBILITY , 2005 .

[21]  Gerald L Ullman,et al.  TRAVEL IMPACTS OF URBAN FREEWAY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS IN TEXAS. INTERIM REPORT , 1990 .

[22]  Helmut T. Zwahlen,et al.  Evaluation of the Accuracy of a Real-Time Travel Time Prediction System in a Freeway Construction Work Zone , 2002 .

[23]  Reginald R. Souleyrette,et al.  Simulating traffic for incident management and ITS investment decisions , 1998 .

[24]  J B Saag PROJECT DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF URBAN FREEWAYS AND EXPRESSWAYS , 1999 .

[25]  Helmut T Zwahlen Evaluation of a Real-Time Travel Time Prediction System in a Freeway Construction Work Zone , 2001 .

[26]  Kenneth R. Agent,et al.  Evaluation of Traffic Information and Prediction System (TIPS) as work zone traffic control. , 2004 .

[27]  R A Krammes,et al.  Updated short-term freeway work zone lane closure capacity values , 1992 .

[28]  Alan J Horowitz,et al.  DIVERSION FROM A RURAL WORK ZONE OWING TO A TRAFFIC-RESPONSIVE VARIABLE MESSAGE SIGNAGE SYSTEM , 2003 .

[29]  J E Hummer,et al.  Capacity and delay in major freeway construction zones , 1996 .

[30]  Madhav Chitturi,et al.  EVALUATION OF CONSTRUCTION WORK ZONE OPERATIONAL ISSUES: CAPACITY, QUEUE, AND DELAY , 2003 .